Describing school effects with residual terms: Modeling the interaction between school practice and student background

Evaluation Review

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 190-211

  Pituch, Keenan A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040883395     PISSN: 0193841X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9902300204     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aitkin, M., and N. Longford. 1986. Statistical modelling issues in school effectiveness research. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, ser. A, 149:1-43.
2. Boyd, L., and G. Iverson. 1979. Contextual analysis: Concepts and statistical techniques. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
3. Bryk, A., and S. Raudenbush. 1992. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Burstein, L., R. Linn, and F. Capell. 1978. Analyzing multilevel data in the presence of heterogeneous within-class regressions. Journal of Educational Statistics 3:347-83.
5. De Leeuw, J. and I. Kreft. 1986. Random coefficient models for multilevel analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics 11(1):57-85.
6. Douglas, K. 1988. The effect of specification error on regression based procedures used in the assessment of school merit. Ph.D. diss., Florida State University, Tallahassee.
7. Dyer, H. 1970. Toward objective criteria of professional accountability in the school of New York City. Phi Delta Kappan 52:206-11.
8. Dyer, H., R. Linn, and M. Patton. 1969. A comparison of four methods of obtaining discrepancy scores based on observed and predicted school system means on achievement tests. American Educational Research Journal 6:561-605.
9. Goldstein, H. 1987. Multilevel models in educational and social research. London: Charles Griffin.
10. _. (1991). Better ways to compare schools? Journal of Educational Statistics 16:89-91.
11. Goldstein, H., J. Rasbash, H. Yang, G. Woodhouse, H. Pan, D. Nuttall, and S. Thomas. 1992. Multilevel models for comparing schools. Multilevel Modelling Newsletter 4(2):5-6.
12. Gray, J., D. Jesson, H. Goldstein, K. Hedger, and J. Rasbash. 1995. A multi-level analysis of school improvement: Changes in schools' performance over time. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 6:97-114.
13. Gray, J., D. Jesson, and N. Sime. 1990. Estimating differences in the examination performances of secondary schools in six LEAs: A multilevel approach to school effectiveness. Oxford Review of Education 16(2):137-58.
14. Hill P., and K. Rowe. 1996. Multilevel modelling in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 7(1):1-34.
15. Hutchinson, D. 1993. School effectiveness studies using administrative data. Educational Research 35(1):27-47.
16. Kreft, I., and J. De Leeuw. 1989. Model based ranking of schools, UCLA statistics ser. 17. Los Angeles: The University of California, ERIC 306 296.
17. Lee, V., and A. Bryk. 1989. A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education 62:172-92.
18. Mandeville, G., and L. Anderson. 1987. The stability of school effectiveness indices across grade level and subject areas. Journal of Educational Measurement 24:203-16.
19. Nuttall D. (1990). Differences in examination performance. London: Research and Statistics Branch, ILEA, RS 1277/90.
20. Nuttall, D., H. Goldstein, R. Prosser, and J. Rasbash. 1989. Differential school effectiveness. International Journal of Educational Research 13(7):769-76.
21. Orsak, T., R. Mendro, W. Webster, K. Bembry, and D. Weerasinghe. 1996. Empirical difficulties in using hierarchical linear models for school rankings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, New York.
22. Phillips, G., and E. Adcock. 1996. Practical applications of hierarchical linear models to district evaluations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, New York.
23. _. 1997. Measuring school effects with hierarchical linear modeling: Data handling and modeling issues. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.
24. Raudenbush, S., and A. Bryk. 1986. A hierarchical model for studying school effects. Sociology of Education 59:1-17.
25. Raudenbush, S., and J. Willms. 1995. The estimation of school effects. Journal of Education and Behavioral Statistics 20:307-35.
26. Reynolds D., P. Sammons, L. Stoll, M. Barber, and J. Hillman. 1996. School effectiveness and school improvement in the United Kingdom. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 7(2):133-58.
27. Sammons, P., D. Nuttall, and P. Cuttance. 1993. Differential school effectiveness: Results from a reanalysis of the inner London educational authority's junior school project data. British Educational Research Journal 19(4):381-405.
28. Sammons, P., D. Nuttall, P. Cuttance, and S. Thomas. 1995. Continuity of school effects: A longitudinal analysis of primary and secondary school effects on GSCE performance. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 6(4):285-307.
29. Smith, D., and S. Tomlinson. 1989. The school effect: A study of multi-racial comprehensives. London: Policy Studies Institute.
30. Tate, R., W. Piotrowski, and S. Im. 1989. School comparisons with hierarchical linear models. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California.
31. Webster, W., R. Mendro, K. Bembry, and T. Orsak. 1995. Alternative methodology for identifying effective schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California.
32. Webster, W., R. Mendro, T. Orsak, and D. Weerasinghe. 1996. The applicability of selected regression and hierarchical linear models to the estimation of school and teacher effects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, New York.
33. _. 1997. A comparison of the results produced by selected regression and hierarchical linear models in the estimation of school and teacher effect. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois.
34. Willms, J. 1992. Monitoring school performance: A guide for educators. Washington, DC: Falmer.
35. Willms, J., and M. Chen. 1989. The effects of ability grouping on the ethnic achievement gap in Israeli elementary schools. American Journal of Education 97(3):237-57.
36. Willms, J., and S. Raudenbush. 1989. A longitudinal hierarchical linear model for estimating school effects and their stability. Journal of Educational Measurement 26:209-32.
37. Woodhouse, G., M. Yang, H. Goldstein, and J. Rasbash. (1996). Adjusting for measurement error in multilevel analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, ser. A, 159:201-12.
38. Young, D., and B. Fraser. 1993. Socioeconomic and gender effects on science achievement: An Australian perspective. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 4(4):265-89.