Paradigmatic cascades: A linguistically sound model of pronunciation by analogy

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 1997-July, Issue , 1997, Pages 428-435

  Yvon, Francois ^a  

^a TELECOM PARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

CASCADE MODELING; LEXICAL DATABASE; PRONUNCIATION LEXICON; SOUND MODELING;

MAPPING;

EID: 0040852399     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Coker, Cecil H., Kenneth W. Church, and Mark Y. Liberman. 1990. Morphology and rhyming: two powerful alternatives to letter-to-sound rules. In Proceedings of the ESCA Conference on Speech Synthesis, Autrans, France.
2. Coltheart, Max. 1978. Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood, editor, Strategies of information processing. Academic Press, New York, pages 151-216.
3. Coltheart, Max, Brent Curtis, Paul Atkins, and Michael Haller. 1993. Models of reading aloud: dual route and parallel distributed processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100:589-608.
4. Damper, Robert I. and John F. G. Eastmond. 1996. Pronuncing text by analogy. In Proceedings of the seventeenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'96), pages 268-273, Copenhagen, Denmark.
5. de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1916. Cours de Linguistique Ggn@rale. Payot, Paris.
6. Dedina, Michael J. and Howard C. Nusbaum. 1991. PRONOUNCE: a program for pronunciation by analogy. Computer Speech and Langage, 5:55-64.
7. Federici, Stefano, Vito Pirrelli, and Franqois Yvon. 1995. Advances in analogy-based learning: false friends and exceptional items in pronunciation by paradigm-driven analogy. In Proceedings of IJ-CAI'95 workshop on 'New Approaches to Learning for Natural Language Processing', pages 158-163, Montreal.
8. Glushsko, J, R. 1981. Principles for pronouncing print: the psychology of phonography. In A. M. Lesgold and C. A. Perfetti, editors, Interactive Processes in Reading, pages 61-84, Hillsdale, New Jersey. Erlbaum.
9. Lepage, Yves and Ando Shin-Ichi. 1996. Saussurian analogy: A theoretical account and its application. In Proceedings of the seventeenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'96)~ pages 717-722, Copenhagen, Den-1Tlarl(.
10. Pirrelli, Vito and Stefano Federici. 1994. "Derivational" paradigms in morphonology. In Proceedings of the sixteenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'94), Kyoto, Japan.
11. Seidenberg, M. S. and James. L. McClelland. 1989. A distributed, developnaental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological review, 96:523-568.
12. Sejnowski, Terrence J. and Charles R. Rosenberg. 1987. Parrallel network that learn to pronounce English text. Complex Systems, 1:145-168.
13. Sullivan, K.P.H and Robert I. Damper. 1992. Novel-word pronunciation within a text-to-speech system. In G~rard Bailly a.nd Christian Benoit, editors, Talking Machines, pages 183-195. North Holland.
14. Torkolla, Karl. 1993. An efficient way to learn English grapheme-to-phoneme rules automatically. In PTvceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), volume 2, pages 199-202, Minneapolis, Apr.
15. van den Bosch, Antal and Walter Daelemans. 1993. Data-oriented methods for grapheme-to-phoneme conversion. In Proceedings of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL), pages 45-53, Utrecht.
16. Yvon, Francois. 1996a. Grapheme-to-phoneme conversion using multiple unbounded overlapping chunks. In Proceedings of the conference on New Methods in Natural Language Processing (NeMLaP II), pages 218-228, Ankara, Turkey.
17. Yvon, Francois. 1996b. Prononcer par analogie: motivations, formalisations et dvaluations. Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Nationale Sup6.rieure des T@l~communications, Paris.