A Meta-Analysis of the Cross-Situational Consistency of Communication Apprehension

Communication Research Reports

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1988, Pages 64-70

  Booth Butterfield, Steven ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040813175     PISSN: 08824096     EISSN: 17464099     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824098809359802     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Beatty, M., & Andriate, G. (1985). Communication apprehension and general anxiety in the prediction of public speaking state anxiety. Communication Quarterly, 33, 174-184.
2. Beatty, M., & Behnke, R. (1980). An assimilation theory perspective of communication apprehension. Human Communication Research, 6, 319-325.
3. Behnke, R., & Beatty, M. (1981). A cognitive-physiological model of speech anxiety. Communication Monographs, 48, 158-163.
4. Biggers, T., & Masterson, J. (1984). Communication apprehension as a personality trait: An emotional defense of a concept. Communication Monographs, 51, 381-390.
5. Booth-Butterfield, M., & Booth-Butterfield, S. (1986). The effects of task structure, evaluation, trait-CA, and reticence on state-CA and behavioral disruption in dyadic settings. Communication Monographs, 52, 144-159.
6. Booth-Butterfield, S., & Gould, M. (1986). The Communication Anxiety Inventory and the validity of state- and context- communication apprehension. Communication Quarterly, 34, 194-205.
7. Buller, D. (1986). Distraction during persuasive communication: A meta-analytic review. Communication Monographs, 53, 91-114.
8. Chase, L., & Simpson, T. (1979). Significance and substance: An examination of experimental effects. Human Communication Research, 5, 351-354.
9. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd edition). New York: Academic Press.
10. Greene, & Sparks, G. (1983). Explication and test of a cognitive model of communication apprehension: A new look at an old construct. Human Communication Research, 9, 349-366.
11. Hewes, D., & Haight, L. (1980). Multiple act criteria in the validation of communication traits: What do we gain and what do we lose? Human Communication Research, 6, 352-366.
12. Hewes, D., & Haight, L. (1979). The cross-situational consistency of communicative behaviors: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Communication Research, 6, 243-370.
13. Jaccard, J., & Daly, J. (1980). Personality traits and multiple- act criteria. Human Communication Research, 6, 367-377.
14. McCroskey, J. (1970). Measures of communication-bound anxiety. Speech Monographs, 37, 269-277.
15. McCroskey, J. (1978). Validity of the PRCA as an index of oral communication apprehension. Communication Monographs, 45, 192-203.
16. McCroskey, J. (1982). Oral communication apprehension: A reconceptualization. In M. Burgoon (Ed.) Communication Yearbook 6, (pp. 136-170). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
17. McCroskey, J. (1983). Cross-situational consistency of the PRCA: Another view. Paper presented at the Western Speech Communication Association convention, Albuquerque.
18. McCroskey, J., & Beatty, M. (1984). Communication apprehension and accumulated communication state anxiety experiences: A research note. Communication Monographs, 51, 79-84.
19. McCroskey, J., Beatty, M., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. (1985). The content validity of the PRCA-24 as a measure of communication apprehension across communication contexts. Communication Quarterly, 33, 165-173.
20. Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment New York: Wiley Press.
21. Parks, M. (1980). A test of the cross-situational consistency of communication apprehension. Communication Monographs, 47, 220-232.
22. Rathus, S. (1973). A 30-item schedule for assessing assertive behavior. Behavior Therapy, 4, 398-406.
23. Richmond, V. (1978). The relationship between trait and state communication apprehension and interpersonal perceptions during acquaintance stages. Human Communication Research, 4, 338-349.
24. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.
25. Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
26. Stiff, J. (1986). Cognitive processing of persuasive message cues: A meta-analytic review of the effects of supporting information on attitudes. Communication Monographs, 53, 75-88.