Avoiding unsavour

Psychologist

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 194-199

  Gunter, Barrie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040787992     PISSN: 09528229     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BBFC (1998). Annual report 1997-98, London: British Board of Film Classification.
2. Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
3. Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance. New York Academic Press.
4. Bruner, J. S. (1966). On cognitive growth I and II. In J. S. Bruner, R. R. Oliver & P. M. Greenfield (Eds.), Studies in cognitive growth (pp. 1-67). New York: Wiley.
5. Bushman, B. J., & Stack, A. D. (1996). Forbidden fruit versus tainted fruit: Effects of warning labels on attraction to television violence, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 207-226.
6. Cantor, J., Harrison, K., & Krcmar, M. (1996). Ratings and advisories for television programming. National television violence study scientific papers 1994-95. Studio City, CA: Mediascope.
7. Cantor, J., Harrison, K., & Nathanson, A. (1998). Ratings and advisories for television programming. National television violence study year 2. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Chen, H.L. (May, 1999). Young adolescents' responses to evaluative and informational labeling systems for television. Paper presented to the Mass Communication Division of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
9. Dowd, E.T., Milne, C. R., & Wise, S. L. (1991). The Therapeutic Reactance Scale: A measure of psychological reactance. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 541-545.
10. Hamilton, J. T. (1998). Channeling violence: The economic market for violent television programming, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11. ITC (1999). Television: The public's view -1998. London: Independent Television Commission.
12. Krcmar, M., & Cantor, J. (1997). The role of television advisories and ratings in parent-child discussion of television viewing choices, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 41, 393-411.
13. Kunkel, D. (1997). Why content, not age of viewers, should control what children watch on TV. The Chronicle of Higher Education, XLIII(21), B4-B5, January 31.
14. Melkman, R., Tversky, B., & Baratz, D. (1981). Developmental trends in the use of perceptual and conceptual attributes in grouping, clustering and retrieval. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 470-486.
15. Roberts, D. F. (1998). Media content labeling systems. In R. G. Noll & M. E. Price (Eds.), A communication cornucopia: Markle Foundation essays on information policy (pp. 350-375). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
16. Salvoza, M. F. (1997). Readers rate TV worse than ever. USA Weekend, May 16-18, pp. 20-21.
17. Sneegas, J. E., & Plank, T. A. (1998). Gender differences in pre-adolescent reactance to age-categorized television advisory labels. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 42, 421-434.
18. Sparks, G.G., & Cantor, J. (1986). Developmental differences in fright responses to a television programme depicting a character transformation. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 30, 309-323.
19. Valenti, J. (1987). The voluntary movie rating system, New York: Motion Picture Association of America.
20. Wicklund, R.A. (1974). Freedom and reactance. Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Wilson, B.J., & Cantor, J. (1985). Developmental differences in empathy with a television protagonist's fear. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 284-299.
22. Wilson, B. J., Linz, D., & Randall, B. (1990). Applying social science research to film ratings: A shift from offensiveness to harmful effects. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 34, 443-468.