Hands-On Biology: A Museum-School-University Partnership for Enhancing Students' Interest and Learning in Science

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 266-288

  Paris, Scott G ^a   Yambor, Kirsten M ^a   Packard, Becky Wai Ling ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040772285     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/461894     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Project 2061: Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. American Association of University Women Foundation. (1992). The AAUW report: How schools shortchange girls. Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation and the National Education Association.
3. Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-291). New York: Macmillan.
4. Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 26, 369-398.
5. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Clifford, M. M. (1991). Risk taking: Theoretical, empirical, and educational considerations. Educational Psychologist, 26, 263-297.
7. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Corno, L. (1989). Self-regulated learning: A volitional analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 111-141). New York: Springer-Verlag.
9. Csikzentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. New York: Academic Press.
11. Eylon, B., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Learning and instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in science education. Review of Educational Research, 58, 251-302.
12. Flexer, B. K., & Borun, M. (1984). The impact of a class visit to a participatory science museum exhibit and a classroom science lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 863-873.
13. Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E., Glass, G. V., & Gamas, W. S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 117-159.
14. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in mathematical performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 139-155.
15. Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. Elementary School Journal, 94, 483-497.
16. Lee, V. E., & Burkham, D. (1995). Gender differences in middle-grade science achievement: Subject domain, ability level, and course emphasis. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
17. Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., Blunk, M., Crawford, B., Kelly, B., & Meyer, K. M. (1994). Enacting project-based science: Experiences of four middle grade teachers. Elementary School Journal, 94, 517-538.
18. Michigan State Board of Education. (1992). Michigan essential goals and objectives for science education (K-12): New directions for science education in Michigan. Lansing: Michigan State Board of Education.
19. National Research Council. (1990). Fulfilling the promise: Biology education in the nation's schools. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20. National Science Foundation. (1993). Indicators of science and mathematics education 1992. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
21. Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269-287.
22. Osborne, R. J., & Freyberg, P. (1986). Learning in science: The implications of children's science. London: Heinemann.
23. Paris, S. G., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Situated motivation. In P. Pintrich, D. Brown, & C. Weinstein (Eds.), Student motivation, cognition, and learning: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie (pp. 213-237). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Pintrich, P., & DeGroot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
25. Pokay, P., & Blumenfeld, P. (1990). Predicting achievement early and late in the semester: The role of motivation and use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 41-50.
26. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Rohrkemper, M., & Corno, L. (1988). Success and failure on classroom tasks: Adaptive learning and classroom teaching. Elementary School Journal, 88, 297-312.
28. Ryan, R. M., & Grolnick, W. S. (1986). Origins and pawns in the classroom: Self-report and projective assessments of individual differences in children's perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 550-558.
29. Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschi, R. A., Schulze, S., & John, J. (1995). Students' understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 131-166.
30. Scheifle, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 299-323.
31. Schunk, D. H. (1989). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 83-110). New York: Springer-Verlag.
32. Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis. Developmental Review, 12, 265-310.
34. Yager, R. E., & Penick, J. E. (1986). Perceptions of four age groups toward science classes, teachers, and the value of science. Science Education, 70, 355-363.