Scanning tunneling microscopy induced chemical-vapor deposition of semiconductor quantum dots

Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B: Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 1344-1348

  Samara, D ^a   Williamson, J R ^a   Shih, C K ^a   Banerjee, S K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040765269     PISSN: 10711023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1116/1.589094     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. A. L. de Lozanne, W. F. Smith, and E. E. Ehrichs, in Proceedings of the NATO Workshop on Nanolithography (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1994).
2. A. D. Kent, T. M. Shaw, S. von Molnar, and D. D. Awschalom, Science 262, 1249 (1993).
3. J. A. Dagata, J. Schneir, H. H. Harary, C. J. Evans, M. T. Postek, and J. Bennett, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 2001 (1990).
4. H. C. Day and D. R. Allee, Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 2691 (1993).
5. T.-C. Shen, C. Wang, J. W. Lyding, and J. R. Tucker, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 976 (1995).
6. M. A. McCord and R. F. W. Pease, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 6, 293 (1988).
7. D. W. Pohl and L. Novotny, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12, 1441 (1994).
8. D. M. Eigler and E. K. Schweizer, Nature 344, 524 (1990).
9. N. Kramer, H. Birk, J. Jorritsma, and C. Schonenberger, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 1325 (1995).
10. S. C. Minne, H. T. Soh, Ph. Flueckiger, and C. F. Quate, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 703 (1995).
11. T. Fayfield and T. K. Higman, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12, 3731 (1994).
12. Control electronics and software from RHK Technologies, Inc., Rochester Hills, MI.
13. D. W. Pohl, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 58, 54 (1987).
14. R. S. Becker, G. S. Higashi, Y. J. Chabal, and A. J. Becker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1917 (1990).
15. Product of Granville-Phillips, Corp.; pressure reading is calibrated for air.
16. M. A. McCord and R. F. W. Pease, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 4, 86 (1986).
17. C. R. K. Marrian and R. J. Colton, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 755 (1990).
18. Y.-W. Mo, D. E. Savage, B. S. Swartzentruber, and M. G. Lagally, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1020 (1990).
19. For example, local band bending in the sample and even possibly the tip (especially if it is coated with silicon or germanium) would tend to give larger than expected band-gap values.