Computer use in a multicultural classroom

Journal of Research on Computing in Education

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 1995, Pages 162-174

  Chisholm, Inés Márquez ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY WEST   (United States)

Author keywords

Elementary education; Learning styles; Management of computing; Multicultural education

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040725651     PISSN: 08886504     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08886504.1995.10782158     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anderson, J.A. (1988). Cognitive styles and multicultural populations. Journal of Teacher Education, 23(1), 2-9.
2. Arthur’s Teacher Troubles [Computer software]. (1992). Novato:, CA: Br0derbund Software, Inc.
3. Au, K.H., & Jordan, C. (1980). Teaching reading to Hawaiian children: Finding a culturally appropriate solution. In H.T. Trueba, G.P. Guthrie, & K.H. Au (Eds.), Cultural and bilingual classroom: Studies in classroom ethnography (pp. 139-152). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
4. Au, K.H., & Kawakami, A.J. (1991). Culture and ownership: Schooling of minority students. Childhood Education, 67(5), 280-284.
5. Banks, J.A. (1981). Education in the '80s: Multiethnic education. Washington, DC: National Education Association. (ERIC ED 204 192).
6. Carrasco, R.L., Vera, A., & Cazden, C.B. (1981). Aspects of bilingual students’ communicative competence in the classroom: A case study. In R.P. Duran, (Ed.) Latino language and communicative behavior (pp. 237-249). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7. Grady Profile [Computer software]. (1991). St. Louis, MO: Aurbach & Associates.
8. Griggs, S.A., & Dunn, R. (1989). The learning styles of multicultural groups and counseling implications. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 17(4), 146-155.
9. Hayes, H. (1992). Computers as catfish: QED’s annual installed base report-Technology in public schools 1991-1992. Educational IRM Quarterly, 1(3), 29-31.
10. Huitt, W.G. (1988). Personality differences between Navajo and non-Indian college students: Implications for instruction. Equity and Excellence, 24(1), 71-74.
11. Jacobs, R.I. (1990). Learning styles of black, average and low achievers. The Clearing House, 63, 253-254.
12. Jalali, F.A. (1989). A cross-cultural comparative analysis of the learning styles and field dependence-independence characteristics of fourth-, fifth-, and sixth-grade students of Afro, Chinese, Greek, and Mexican heritage. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, St. Johns University, Jamaica, NY.
13. Kagan, S. (1992). Cooperative learning. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Resources for Teachers, Inc.
14. KidPix [Computer software]. (1991). Novato, CA: Br0derbund Software, Inc.
15. Male, M. (1988). Special magic: Computers, classroom strategies, and exceptional students. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
16. McCollum, P. (1989). Turn-allocation in lessons with North American and Puerto Rican students: A comparative study. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 20(2), 133-158.
17. Moll, L.C. (1988). Some key issues in teaching Latino students. Language Arts, 65(5), 465-472.
18. More, A J. (1989, August). Native Indian learning styles: A review for researchers and teachers. Journal of American Indian Education, 15-28.
19. Papert, S. (1987). Computer criticism versus technocentric thinking. Educational Researcher, 16(1), 23-30.
20. Ramirez, M., Ill, & Castañeda, A. (1974). Cultural democracy, bicognitive development, and education. New York: Academic Press.
21. Rhodes, R.W. (1990). Measurement of Navajo and Hopi brain dominance and learning styles. Journal of American Indian Education, 29(3), 29-40.
22. Ryba, K., & Anderson, B. (1993). Learning with computers: Effective teaching strategies. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
23. Singh, B.R. (1988). Cognitive styles, cultural pluralism, and effective teaching and learning. International Review of Education, 34(3), 355-370.
24. Tharp, R.G. (1989). Psychocultural variables and constants: Effects on teaching and learning in schools. American Psychologist, 44(2), 349-359.
25. Vogt, L., Jordan, C., & Tharp, R. (1987). Explaining school failure, producing school success: Two cases. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 18(A), 276-286.