Further psychometric evaluation of the Japanese version of an academic self-concept scale

Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied

Volumn 136, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 298-306

  Paik, Chie Matsuzawa ^a   Michael, William B ^b  

^a UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Japanese version; Scale evaluation; Self concept

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; EVALUATION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAPAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF CONCEPT; SEX DIFFERENCE; STUDENT;

ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAPAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF CONCEPT; SEX FACTORS; STUDENTS;

EID: 0040675629     PISSN: 00223980     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223980209604157     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Al-Samarrai, N., Michael, W. B., & Hocevar, D. (1993). The development and validation of an Arabic version of an academic self-concept scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 249-257.
2. Bagozzi, R. P., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). A general approach to representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to sate self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling, 1 (1), 35-67.
3. Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS: Structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
4. Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
5. Byrne, B. M. (1989). A Primer of LISREL. New York: Springer-Verlag.
6. Fernandez, L. M., Michael, W. B., & Smith, R. A. (1978). The factorial validity of three forms of the Dimensions of Self-Concept measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 537-545.
7. Gribbons, B. C. (1995). Validation and the methodological issues related to a construct of higher-order academic self-concept. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California.
8. Hattie, J. (1992). Self-concept. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1979). Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
10. Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562-582.
11. Marsh, H. W., & O'Neil, R. (1984). Self-Description Questionnaire III: The construct validity of multidimensional self-concept ratings by late adolescents. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21, 153-174.
12. Michael, W. B., & Smith, R. A. (1976). The development and preliminary validation of three forms of a self-concept measure emphasizing school-related activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36, 521-528.
13. Michael, W. B., Smith, R. A., & Michael, J. J. (1989). Dimensions of Self-Concept (DOSC): A self-report inventory of five school-related factors of self-concept, Forms E, S, and H. San Diego, CA: Educational & Industrial Testing Service.
14. Paik, C. M., & Michael, W. B. (1999). A construct validity investigation of scores on a Japanese version of an academic self-concept scale for secondary school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1), 98-110.
15. Shavelson, R. J., & Marsh, H. W. (1986). On the structure of self-concept. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-related cognitions in anxiety and motivation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
17. Villar, I. D., Michael, W. B., & Gribbons, B. (1995a). The development and construct validity of a Portuguese version of an academic self-concept scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 115-123.
18. Villar, I. D., Michael, W. B., & Gribbons, B. (1995b). Further evidence of the construct validity and reliability of a Portuguese version of an academic self-concept scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 1032-1038.