Do women pay more for new vehicles? Evidence from transaction price data

American Economic Review

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 270-279

  Harless, David W ^a   Hoffer, George E ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040671566     PISSN: 00028282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1257/000282802760015711     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Automotive News. "Dealer Incentives." February 28, 2000, (5863), p. 60.
2. Ayres, Ian. "Further Evidence of Discrimination in New Car Negotiations and Estimates of Its Causes." Michigan Law Review, October 1995, 94(1), pp. 109-47.
3. Ayres, Ian and Siegelman, Peter. "Race and Gender Discrimination in Bargaining for a New Car." American Economic Review, June 1995, 85(3), pp. 304-21.
4. Chamberlain, Gary. "Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data." Review of Economic Studies, January 1980, 47(1), pp. 225-38.
5. Consumer Reports. "Summary Judgements of the 1987 Cars." April 1987, 52(4), pp. 211-29.
6. Freedman, David A. "Ecological Inference and the Ecological Fallacy," in Neil J. Smelser and Paul B. Baltes, eds., International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences, Vol. 6, New York: Elsevier Science, 2001, pp. 4027-30.
7. Goldberg, Pinelopi Koujianoi. "Dealer Price Discrimination in New Car Purchases: Evidence from the Consumer Expenditure Survey." Journal of Political Economy, June 1996, 104(3), pp. 622-54.
8. Greene, William H. Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1997.
9. J.D. Power and Associates. PIN manufacturer user's manual. Los Angeles, CA: J. D. Power and Associates, 1999.
10. Mediamark Research. Automobiles, motorcycles, trucks, driving report. New York: Mediamark Research, Inc., 1996.
11. U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1999.