Forms of identity and argumentation

Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 35-50

  Maier, Robert ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040653799     PISSN: 00218308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1996.tb00284.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. APOSTEL, L. (1993). Waarde en zin van de cultuurwetenschappen in de twintigste eeuw. Kapellen. Pelckmans.
2. BATENS, D. (1992). Menselijke kennis. Pleidooi voor enn bruikbare rationaliteit. Leuven: Garant.
3. BLAIR, J. & JOHNSON, R. (1987). Argumentation as dialectical. Argumentation, 1, 1, 41-56.
4. BOS, J. & MAIER, R. (1992). The name of the game. An analysis of the Grünbaum debate. Communication & Cognition, 25, 4, 295-324.
5. EEMEREN, F. VAN & KRUIGER, T. (1987). Identifying argumentation schemes. In F. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. Blair & C. Willard (Eds), Argumentation: Perspectives and Approaches. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 70-81.
6. EEMEREN, F. VAN & GROOTENDORST, R. (1983). Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. Dordrecht: Foris.
7. EEMEREN, F. VAN & GROOTENDORST, R. (1992). Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8. EEMEREN, F. VAN, DE GLOPPER, K., GROOTENDORST, R. & GARSSEN, B. (1994). Student performance in identifying unexpressed premises and argumentation schemes. In F. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst (Eds), Studies in Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam: Sic Sat, pp. 89-103.
9. GARSSEN, B. (1994). Recognizing argumentation schemes. In F. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst (Eds), Studies in Pragma-Dialectics. Amsterdam: Sic Sat, pp. 105-111.
10. GERGEN, K. (1990). The Saturated Self. Dilemmas of Identify in Contemporary Life. New York: Basic Books.
11. GIDDENS, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12. GILBERT, G. & MULKAY, M. (1984). Opening Pandora's Box. A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. HABERMAS, J. (1976). Moralentwicklung und Ich-Identität. In J. Habermas, Zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 63-91.
14. HABERMAS, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
15. KIENPOINTNER, M. (1992). Alltagslogik. Struktur und Funktion van Argumentationsmustern. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.
16. KOPPERSCHMIDT, J. (1989). Methodik der Argumentationsanalyse. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.
17. MAIER, R. (1989). Argumentation: a multiplicity of regulated rational interactions. In R. Maier (Ed.), Norms in Argumentation. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 123-141.
18. MAIER, R. (1992). Dialogue and power. In H. Löffler (Ed.), Dialoganalyse IV. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, pp. 235-240.
19. PERELMAN, C. & OLBRECHTS-TYTECA, L. (1969). The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. London: University of Notre Dame Press.
20. WOODS, J. & WALTON, D. (1989). Fallacies. Dordrecht: Foris.