Self-calibration from four views with possibly varying intrinsic parameters

Image and Vision Computing

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 293-305

  Enciso, Reyes ^a   Viéville, Thierry ^a  

^a INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

3D Euclidean reconstruction; Fundamental matrix; Self calibration

Indexed keywords

CAMERAS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MATRIX ALGEBRA; THREE DIMENSIONAL; VISION;

EUCLIDEAN RECONSTRUCTION; SELF-CALIBRATION;

IMAGING TECHNIQUES;

EID: 0040635257     PISSN: 02628856     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0262-8856(96)01131-6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Z. Zhang, R. Deriche, O. Faugeras and Q.-T. Luong. A robust technique for matching two uncalibrated images through the recovery of the unknown epipolar geometry. Artificial Intelligence J., 78(1-2) (1994) 87-119.
2. Z. Zhang, Q.-T. Luong and O. Faugeras, Motion of an uncalibrated stereo rig: self-calibration and metric reconstruction. Proc. International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 695 697, Jerusalem. Israel. October 1994. IEEE Computer Society Press. (Full version to appear in IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation.)
3. A. Zisserman, P.A. Beardsley and I.D. Reid, Metric calibration of a stereo rig. Proc. Workshop on Visual Scene Representation, Boston, MA, June 1995.
4. Q.-T. Luong and T. Vieville, Canonic representation for the geometries of multiple projective views. In: J.-O. Eklundh (ed), Proc. 3rd European Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 800 801 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 589-599, Vol. 1, Stockholm, Sweden, May 1994. Springer-Verlag.
5. T. Viéville, Q. Luong and O. Faugeras. Motion of points and lines in the uncalibrated case. International J. Computer Vision. 17 (1) (1995).
6. O. Faugeras, What can be seen in three dimensions with an uncalibrated stereo rig. In: G. Sandini (ed), Proc. 2nd European Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 588 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 563-578. Santa Margherita Ligure, Italy, May 1992 Springer-Verlag.
7. R. Hartley, R. Gupta and T. Chang, Stereo from uncalibrated cameras. Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 761-764, Urbana Champaign, IL. June 1992, IEEE.
8. R. Mohr, L. Quan, F. Veillon and B. Boufama, Relative 3D reconstruction using multiple uncalibrated images. Technical Report RT84-IMAG12. LIFIA, June 1992.
9. R.I. Hartley, Estimation of relative camera positions for uncalibrated cameras. In: G. Sandini (ed). Proc. 2nd European Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 588 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 579-587. Santa Margherita Ligure, Italy, May 1992. Springer-Verlag.
10. J.J. Koenderink and A.J. van Doom, Affine structure from motion. J. Optical Society of America, A8 (1991) 377-385.
11. C. Zeller and O. Faugeras, Applications of non-metric vision to some visual guided tasks. Proc. International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 132-136, Jerusalem, Israel, October 1994. IEEE Computer Society Press. (A longer version in INRIA Tech Report RR2308.)
12. R. Hartley, Self-calibration from multiple views with a rotating camera. In: J.-O. Eklundh (ed). Proc. 3rd European Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 800 801 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 471-478, Stockholm, Sweden, May 1994. Springer-Verlag.
13. A. Basu, Active calibration: alternative strategy and analysis. Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 495-500, New-York, June 1993. IEEE Computer Society.
14. L. Dron, Dynamic camera self-calibration for controlled motion sequences. Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 501-506, New-York, June 1993. IEEE Computer Society.
15. F. Du and M. Brady. Self-calibration of the intrinsic parameters of cameras for active vision systems. Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 477-482, New-York, June 1993. IEEE Computer Society.
16. P.F. McLauchlan and D. Murray, Variable state dimension filter applied to active camera calibration. Proc. SPIE Sensor Fusion VI, Boston, USA, vol. 2059, pp. 14-25, September 1993.
17. R. Enciso, T. Viéville and O. Faugeras, Approximation du changement de focale et de mise au point par une transformation affine à trois paramètres. Traitement du Signal, 11(5) (1994).
18. T. Viéville, E. Clergue, R. Enciso and H. Mathieu, Experimentating with 3d vision on a robotic head. Robotics and Autonomous Systems. 14(1) (1995).
19. J. Lavest, G. Rives and M. Dhome, 3-D reconstruction by zooming. IEEE Trans. Robotics and Automation, 9(2) (April 1993) 196-207.
20. O. Faugeras, T. Luong and S. Maybank, Camera self-calibration: theory and experiments. In: G. Sandini (ed). Proc. 2nd ECCV. vol. 588 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 321-334, Santa Margherita Ligure, Italy, May 1992. Springer-Verlag.
21. T.S. Huang and O.D. Faugeras, Some properties of the E matrix in two-view motion estimation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11(12) (December 1989) 1310-1312.
22. A. Shashua. Trilinearity in visual recognition by alignment. In: J.-O. Eklundh (ed). Proc. 3rd European Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 800-801 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. pp. 479-484, Stockholm, Sweden, May 1994. Springer-Verlag.
23. L. Robert, Perception stéréoscopique de courbes et de surfaces tridimensionnelles. Applications à la robotique mobile. PhD thesis, École Polytechnique, Paris, France, March 1993.
24. T. Blaszka and R. Deriche, Recovering and characterizing image features using an efficient model based approach. Technical Report 24:2. INRIA. November 1994.
25. R. Enciso, A. Zisserman and T. Viéville, An affine solution to the euclidean calibration while using a zoom lens. Workshop ALCATECH, Denmark, pp. 21-27, July 1996.
26. P. Beardsley, A. Zisserman and D. Murray, Sequential update of proactive and affine structure from motion. Technical Report OUEL 2012 94, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford. August 1994.