Pursuing problems in growth

Journal of Economic Growth

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 283-308

  Keely, Louise C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Growth; Schmookler; Technological change

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040620397     PISSN: 13814338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1020110200049     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
2. Bairoch, P. (1991). "The City and Technological Innovation," in P. Higonnet, D. S. Landes, and H. Rosovsky, eds., Favorites of Fortune. Harvard University Press, pp. 159-176.
3. Cowan, R. S. (1997). A Social History of American Technology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4. Dalgaard, C.-J., and C. T. Kreiner. (2001). "Is Declining Productivity Inevitable?" The Journal of Economic Growth 6, 187-203.
5. David, P. A. (1977). "Invention and Accumulation in America's Economic Growth: A Nineteenth Century Parable". Journal of Monetary Economics 6, 176-228.
6. Edwards, S. (1988). "Openness, Productivity and Growth: What do we Really Know?" Economic Journal 108 (447).
7. Geroski, P. A., and C. Walters. (1995). "Innovative Activity Over the Business Cycle," Economic Journal 105 (431), 916-928.
8. Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
9. Hall, B. H. (1993). "The Stock Market's Valuation of R&D Investment During the 1980s," AEA Papers and Proceedings 83(2), 259-264.
10. Jaffe, A. B. (1988). "Demand and Supply Influences in R&D Intensity and Productivity Growth," Review of Economics and Statistics 70(3), 431-437.
11. Jones, C. I. (2002). "Sources of US Economic Growth in a World of Ideas," American Economic Review 92(1), 220-239.
12. Jovanovic, B. (1995). "Learning and Growth." Working Paper 5383, NBER.
13. Keely, L. C. (2001). "Using Patents in Growth Models," Economics of Innovation and New Technology 10, 449-492.
14. Kleinknecht, A., and B. Verspagen. (1990). "Demand and Innovation: Schmookler Re-examined," Research Policy 19(4), 387-395.
15. Klevorick, A. K., R. C. Levin, R. R. Nelson, and S. G. Winter. (1995). "On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities," Research Policy 24, 185-205.
16. Kortum, S. S. (1997). "Research, Patenting, and Technological Change," Econometrica 65(6), 1389-1419.
17. Kortum, S. S., and J. Lerner. (1998). "Stronger Protection or Technological Revolution: What is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?" Carnegie-Rochester Series on Public Policy 48, 247-304.
18. Landau, R., and N. Rosenberg. (1992). "Successful Commercialization in the Chemical Process Industries," in N. Rosenberg, R. Landau, and D. C. Mowery, eds., Technology and the Wealth of Nations. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
19. Landes, D. S. (1998). The Wealth and Poverty of Nations. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
20. Lebergott, S. (1984). The Americans: An Economic Record. New York: Norton.
21. Mokyr, J. (1990). The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22. Mowery, D., and N. Rosenberg. (2000). "Twentieth Century Technological Change," in S. L. Engerman, and R. E. Gallman, eds., The Cambridge Economic History of the United States. Volume III, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 803-926.
23. Mowery, D. C., and N. Rosenberg. (1990). Paths of Innovation: Technological Change in 20th Century America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24. Olsson, O. (2000). "Knowledge as a Set in Idea Space: An Epistomological View on Growth," Journal of Economic Growth 5(3), 253-275.
25. Romer, P. M. (1990). "Endogenous Technological Change," Journal of Political Economy 98(5), s71-s102.
26. Romer, P. M. (1994). "The Origins of Endogenous Growth," Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(1), 3-22.
27. Rosenberg, N. (1974). "Science, Invention and Economic Growth," The Economic Journal 84(333), 90-108.
28. Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Rosenberg, N. (1994). Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics, and History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Scherer, F. (1982) "Demand-pull and Technological Invention: Schmookler Revisited," The Journal of Industrial Economics 30(3), 225-237.
31. Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
32. Segerstrom, P. (1998). "Endogenous Growth Without Scale Effects," American Economic Review 88(5), 1290-1310.
33. Stiglitz, J. E. (1993). "Endogenous Growth and Cycles," Working Paper 4286, NBER.
34. Summers, R., and A. Heston. (1991). "The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950-1988," Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(2), 327-368.
35. Weitzman, M. (1998). "Recombinant Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(2), 331-360.
36. Wolff, E. N. (1996). "The Productivity Shutdown: The Culprit at Last? Follow-up on Hulten and Wolff," American Economic Review 86(5), 1239-1252.
37. Wyatt, G. (1986). The Economics of Invention. New York: Palgrave.
38. Young, A. (1991). "Learning by Doing and the Dynamic Effects of International Trade," Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 369-405.