Physicochemical properties of three rice varieties

Journal of Food Quality

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 279-289

  Hettiarachchy, N S ^a   Griffin, V K ^a   Gnanasambandam, R ^a   Moldenhauer, K ^b   Siebenmorgen, T ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^c University of Arkansas   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040601222     PISSN: 01469428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4557.1997.tb00471.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. AACC. 1991. Amylograph method for milled rice. AACC method 61-01. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, MN.
2. BHATTACHARYA, K.R. and SOWBHAGYA, C.M. 1979. Pasting behavior of rice: A new method of viscography. J. Food Sci. 44, 797-780, 784.
3. BORNET, F.R.J. et al. 1989. Insulin and glycemic responses in healthy humans to native starches processed in different ways: Correlation with in vitro α-amylase hydrolysis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 50, 315-323
4. BOURNE, M.C. 1978. Texture profile analysis. Food Technol. 32(7), 62-66,72.
5. DZIEZAK, J.D. 1991. Romancing the kernel: A salute to rice varieties. Food Technol. 45(6), 74-78.
6. JULIANO, B.O. 1982. An international survey of methods used for evaluation of the cooking and eating qualities of milled rice. Paper ser. no. 77. pp. 28. International Rice Research Institute, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines.
7. JULIANO, B.O. 1985a. Cooperative tests on cooking properties of milled rice. Cereal Food World 30(9), 651-656.
8. JULIANO, B.O. 1985b. Rice: Chemistry and Technology. (B.O. Juliano, ed.) pp. 482-483, AACC, Inc. St.Paul, MN.
9. KOHLWEY, D.E. 1994. New methods for the evaluation of rice quality and related terminology. In Rice Science and Technology. (W.E. Marshall and J.I. Wadsworth, eds.) 439 pp. Marcel Dekker, New York.
10. LANDERS, P.S., GBUR, E.E. and SHARP, R.N. 1991. Comparison of two models to predict amylose concentration in rice flours as determined by spectrophotometric assay. Cereal Chem. 68(5), 545-548
11. LINSCOME, S.D. et al. 1991/1992. Louisiana-Agriculture 35(2), 6-7, Baton Rouge LA.
12. MAZURS, E.G., SCHOCH, T.J. and KITE, F.E. 1957. Graphical analysis of the brabender viscosity curves of various starches. Cereal Chem. 34(3), 141-152.
13. McKENZIE, K.S. 1994. Breeding for rice quality. In Rice Science and Technology. (W.E. Marshall and J.I. Wadsworth, eds.) pp. 439, Marcel Dekker, New York.
14. MYERS, R.A. 1994. Changing market demands for rice and rice products. In Rice Science and Technology. (W.I. Marshall and J.I. Wadsworth, eds.) 439 pp. Marcel Dekker, New York.
15. PANLASIGUI, L.N., THOMPSON, L.U., JULIANO, B.O., PEREZ, C.M., YIU, S.H. and GREENBERG, G.R. 1991. Rice varieties with similar amylose content differ in starch digestibility and glycemic response in humans. Am J. Clin. Nutr. 54, 871-877.
16. SAS 1988. SAS User's Guide:Statistics, SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
17. YOKOYOMA, W.H., HUDSON, C.A., CHIU, M.M. and BETSCHART, A.A. 1994. Effect of formulation and processing on the enzymatic digestion of common cereal products. Cereal Foods World. 39(6), 439-443.