Dialogical rhetoric: An application of Martin Buber’s philosophy of dialogue

Quarterly Journal of Speech

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 168-189

  Czubaroff, Jeanine ^a  

^a URSINUS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dialectic; Dialogue; Rhetoric

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040522466     PISSN: 00335630     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00335630009384288     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Anderson, R. (1982). Phenomenological dialogue, humanistic psychology, and pseudo-walls: A response and extension. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 46, 344-357.
2. Anderson, R., Cissna, K.N., & Arnett, R.C. (Eds.) (1994). The reach of dialogue: Confirmation, voice, and community. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
3. Anderson, R. & Cissna, K.N. (1996). Criticism and conversational texts: Rhetorical bases of role, audience, and style in the Buber-Rogers dialogue. Human Studies, 19, 85-118.
4. Anderson, R. & Cissna, K.N. (1997). The Martin Buber-Carl Rogers dialogue: A new transcript with commentary. Albany: State University of New York Press.
5. Anderson, R. & Ross, V. (1994). Questions of Communication: A practical introduction to theory. New York: St. Martins.
6. Arnett, R.C. (1981). Toward a phenomenological dialogue. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 45, 201-212.
7. Arnett, R.C. (1982). Rogers and Buber: Similarities, yet fundamental differences. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 45, 358-372.
8. Arnett, R.C. (1986). Communication and community: Implications of Martin Buber's dialogue. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
9. Arnett, R.C. (1987). Martin Buber's theopolitical rhetoric of religious socialism. Journal of Communication and Religion, 10, 12-23.
10. Arnett, R.C. (1989). What is dialogic communication? Friedman's contribution and clarification. Person-Centered Review, 4, 1 (February), 42-60.
11. Arnett, R.C. (1993). Dialogic education: Conversation about ideas and between persons. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
12. Arnett, R.C. & Nakagawa, G. (1983). The assumptive roots of empathic listening: A critique. Communication Education, 32, (October), 368-378.
13. Barnlund, D.C. (1962). Toward a meaning-centered philosophy of communication. The Journal of Communication, 12, 197-211.
14. Bitzer, L. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, 1-12.
15. Brockriede, W. (1972). Arguers as lovers. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 5, 1, 1-14.
16. Buber, M. (1965). Between man and man. (R.G. Smith, trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
17. Buber, M. (1965). The knowledge of man. (M. Friedman & R.G. Smith, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.
18. Buber, M. (1967). A believing humanism: Gleanings. (M. Friedman, trans.) NY: Simon and Schuster.
19. Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou. (W. Kaufmann, trans.). New York: Charles Scribner's.
20. Cissna, K.N. & Anderson, A. (1990). The contributions of Carl R. Rogers to a philosophical praxis of dialogue. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54, 125-147.
21. Cissna, K.N. & Anderson, R. (1994a). The 1957 Martin Buber-Carl Rogers dialogue, as dialogue. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 34, 1 (Winter), 11-45.
22. Cissna, K.N. & Anderson, R. (1994b). Dialogue in public: Looking critically at the Buber Rogers dialogue. In M. Friedman (ed.) Martin Buber and the human sciences, 191-206. Albany: State University of New York Press.
23. Cissna, K.N. & Anderson, R. (1998). Theorizing about dialogic moments: The Buber-Rogers position and postmodern themes. Communication Theory, 81 (February), 63-104.
24. Clark, A. (1976). "Martin Buber, dialogue, and the philosophy of rhetoric." In Philosophers on rhetoric: Traditional and emerging views. (D.G. Douglas, ed.). Skokie, ILL: National Textbook Company, 225-242.
25. Douglas, D.G. (1976). Philosophers on rhetoric: Traditional and emerging views. Skokie, ILL: National Textbook Company.
26. Eisenstadt, S.N. Ed. (1992). Martin Buber on intersubjectivity and cultural creativity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
27. Foss, S.K. (1990). Rhetorical criticism: Exploration and practice. 2nd ed. Prospect-Heights, ILL: Waveland Press.
28. Friedman, M.S. (1955). Martin Buber: The life of dialogue. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
29. Friedman, M.S. (1967). The existential man: Buber. In The educated man: Studies in the history of educational thought, Chp. 14. (P. Nash, et al., ed.). NY: John Wiley.
30. Friedman, M.S. Ed. & Tr. (1969). Martin Buber and the theater. NY: Funk & Wagnalls.
31. Friedman, M.S. (1982, 1983, 1984). Martin Buber's life and work, 3, Vols. New York: E.P. Dutton.
32. Friedman, M.S. (1985). The healing dialogue in psychotherapy. NY: Jason Aronson.
33. Friedman, M.S. (1992). Dialogue and the human image: Beyond humanistic psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34. Friedman, M.S. (1994a). Partnership of existence. In Anderson, R. et al., The reach of dialogue: Confirmation, voice, and community, 79-88. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
35. Friedman, M. (1994b). Reflections on the Buber Rogers dialogue. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 34, 1 (Winter), 46-65.
36. Garret, M. & X. Xiao. (1993). The rhetorical situation revisited. Rhetorical Society Quarterly, 23, 30-40.
37. Gearhart, S.M. (1979). The womanization of rhetoric. Women's Studies International Quarterly, 2, 195-201.
38. Gergen, K.J. (1995). Postmodernism as a humanism. The Humanistic Psychologist, 23, (Spring), 71-82.
39. Hackforth, R. (Tr.) (1979). Plato's Phaedrus. NY: Cambridge University Press.
40. Hart, R.P. & Burks, D.M. (1972). Rhetorical sensitivity and social interaction. Speech Monographs, 39, 75-91.
41. Hauser, G.A. (1986). Introduction to rhetorical theory. NY: Harper and Row.
42. Jensen, J.V. (1987). Rhetorical emphases of Taoism. Rhetorica, V, 3 (Summer), 219-229.
43. Johannesen, R.L. (1971). The emerging concept of communication as dialogue. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 57, 4, 373-382.
44. Kaufmann, W. (ed.). (1956). Existentialism: From Dostoevsky to Sartre. New York: World Publishing.
45. Kaufmann, W. (1980). Discovering the mind: Nietzsche, Heidegger, and Buber. New York: McGraw-Hill.
46. Kohn, A. (1990). The brighter side of human nature: Altruism and empathy in everyday life. NY: Basic Books.
47. Larson, C.U. (1995). Persuasion, reception and responsibility. 7th ed. Boston: Wadsworth.
48. Lucaites, J., C.M. Condit, & S. Caudill. Eds. (1999). Contemporary rhetorical theory. NY: Guilford Press.
49. McKeon, R. (Ed.) (1968). The basic works of Aristotle. NY: Random.
50. McKerrow, R.E. (1990). Argument communities. In R. Trapp and J. Schueetz, Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede, 27-40. Prospect Hts, ILL: Waveland.
51. Murphy, J.M. (1998). Knowing the president: The dialogic evolution of the campaign history. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 84, 23-40.
52. Natanson. M. (1965a). The claims of immediacy. In M. Natanson & H. W. Johnstone, Jr., eds. Philosophy, rhetoric and argumentation, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
53. Natanson, M. (1965b). The limits of rhetoric. In M. Natanson & H.W. Johnstone, eds. Philosophy, rhetoric and argumentation, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
54. Nelson, J.S., A. Megill, & D.N. McCloskey. Eds. (1987). The rhetoric of the human sciences: Language and argument in scholarship and public affairs. WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
55. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
56. Oliver, R.T. (1961). The rhetorical implications of Taoism. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 47, 27-35.
57. Perelman, C. & L. Olbrechts-Tyteca. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver, trs. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
58. Poulakos, J. (1974). The components of dialogue. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 38, 199-21.
59. Reynolds, B.K. (196). Lao Tzu: Persuasion through inaction and non-speaking. Today's Speech, 77, 1, 23-25.
60. Rogers, C.R. (1975). Empathic: An unappreciated way of being. The Counseling Psychologist, 5, (2), 2-10.
61. Rome, S. & Rome, B. Eds. (1964). Philosophical (Interrogations. Interrogation of Martin Buber conducted by M.S. Friedman) NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
62. Schilpp, P.A. & Friedman, M. (1967). The philosophy of Martin Buber. LaSalle, ILL: Open Court.
63. Scott, R.L. (1975). A synoptic view of systems of western rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 439-447.
64. Shotter, J. (1997). On a different ground: From contests between monologues to dialogical contest. Argumentation, 11, 1, 95-112.
65. Simons, H.W. (1976). Persuasion: Understanding, practice, and analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
66. Simons, H.W. (1989). Rhetoric in the human sciences. London: Sage.
67. Simons, H.W. & Billig, M. (eds.). (1994). After postmodernism: Reconstructing ideology critique. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
68. Sinaiko, H.L. (1965). Love, knowledge, and discourse in Plato: Dialogue and dialectic in Phaedrus, Republic, Parmenides. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69. Stewart, J. (1978). Foundations of dialogic communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 64, 183-201.
70. Stewart, J. (1983). Interpretive listening: An alternative to empathy. Communication Education, 32, (October), 379-391.
71. Stewart, J. (1985). Martin Buber's central insight: Implications for his philosophy of dialogue. In Dialogue: An inter-disciplinary approach. (M. Dascal & H. Cuyckens, eds.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
72. Stewart, J. & G. D'Angelo. (1988). Together: Communicating interpersonally, 3rd ed. New York: Random.
73. Stewart, J. (ed.) (1990). Bridges not walls: A book about interpersonal communication. 5th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
74. Stewart, J. (1991). A postmodern look at traditional communication postulates. Western Journal of Communication, 55 (Fall), 354-379.
75. Stewart, J. (1995). Language as articulate contact: Toward a post-semiotic philosophy of communication. Albany: State University of New York Press.
76. Theunissen, M. (1984). The other: Studies in the social ontology of Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, and Buber. Tr. C. Macann. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77. Thomlison, T.D. (1974). The existential foundations of dialogic communication. Journal of the Illinois Speech and Theatre Association, 28, 1, 1-5.
78. Thomlison, T.D. (1975). The necessary and sufficient characteristics of dialogic communication: The dialogic process equation. Journal of the Illinois Speech and Theatre Association, 29, 1, 34-42.
79. Trenholm, S. (1989). Persuasion and social influence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
80. Vatz, R.E. (1973). The myth of the rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 6, 154-157.
81. Vermes, P. (1980). Buber on God and the perfect man. Chico, CA: Scholars Press.
82. Weaver, R. (1953). The ethics of rhetoric. Chicago, ILL: Henry Regnery Company.
83. Whitehead, A.N. (1925/1953). Science and the modern world. New York: Free Press.
84. Whitehead, A.N. (1933/1961). Adventures of ideas. NY: Free Press.
85. Wilson, J.F., Arnold, C.C., & Wertheimer, M.M. (1990). Public speaking as a liberal art, 6th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.