The influence of spouses' behavior and marital dissolution on marijuana use: Causation or selection

Journal of Marriage and Family

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 22-36

  Yamaguchi, Kazuo ^a   Kandel, Denise B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^b Department of Psychiatry ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Divorce; Latent trait model; Log linear analysis; Marijuana; Spouse influence

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040512848     PISSN: 00222445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/353659     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-19, 716-723.
2. Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Radosevich, M. J. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review, 44, 636-655.
3. Aseltine, R. H. (1995). A reconsideration of parental and peer influences on adolescent deviance. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 103-121.
4. Booth, A., & Amato, P. (1991). Divorce and psychological stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32, 396-407.
5. Brook, J. S., Lukoff, I. F., & Whiteman, M. (1978). Family socialization and adolescent personality and their association with adolescent use of marijuana. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 133, 261-271.
6. Bruce, M. A., & Kim, K. M. (1992). Differences in the effects of divorce on major depression in men and women. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 914-917.
7. Buss, D. M. (1984a). Marital assortment for personality dispositions: Assessment with three different data sources. Behavior Genetics, 14, 111-123.
8. Buss, D. M. (1984b). Toward a psychology of person-environment (PE) correlation: The role of spouse selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 361-377.
9. Caspi, A., & Herbener, E. S. (1990). Continuity and change: Assortative marriage and the consistency of personality in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 250-258.
10. Duncan, O. D. (1985). New light on the 16-fold table. American Journal of Sociology, 19, 88-128.
11. Eaves, L. J., Eysenck, H. J. & Martin, N. G. (1989). Genes, culture and personality. London: Academic Press.
12. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13. Ennett, S. T., & Bauman, K. E. (1994). The contribution of influence and selection to adolescent peer group homogeneity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 653-663.
14. Feingold, L. (1984). Genetic and environmental determinants of social attitudes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford, Oxford, England.
15. Haberman, S. (1988). A stabilized Newton-Raphson algorithm for log-linear models for frequency tables derived by indirect observation. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology (Vol. 18 pp. 193-211). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
16. Hall, R. L., Hesselbrock, V. M., & Stabenau, J. R. (1983). Familial distribution of alcohol use: II. Assortative mating of alcoholic probands. Behavior Genetics, 13, 373-382.
17. Ho, H. (1986). Assortative mating in unwed birth parents, adoptive and nonadoptive parents. Social Biology, 33, 77-86.
18. Jacob, T., & Bremer, D. A. (1986). Assortative mating among men and women alcoholics. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 47, 219-222.
19. Kalmijn, M. (1991a). Shifting boundaries: Trends in religious and educational homogamy. American Sociological Review, 56, 786-800.
20. Kalmijn, M. (1991b). Status homogamy in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 496-523.
21. Kalmijn, M. (1994). Assortative mating by cultural and economic occupational status. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 422-452.
22. Kandel, D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427-436.
23. Kandel, D. B. (1984). Marijuana users in young adulthood. Archives of General Psychiatry, 41, 200-209.
24. Kandel, D. B. (1993). The social demography of drug use. In R. Bayer & G. M. Oppenheimer (Eds.), Confronting drug policy (pp. 24-77). New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. Kandel, D. B., Davies, M., & Baydar, N. (1990). The creation of interpersonal contexts: Homophily in dyadic relationships in adolescence and young adulthood. In L. Robins & M. Rutter (Eds.), Straight & devious pathways from childhood to adulthood (pp. 221-241). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26. Kandel, D. B., Raveis, V. H., & Kandel, P. I. (1984). Continuity in discontinuities: Adjustment in young adulthood of former school absentees and school dropouts. Youth and Society, 13, 325-352.
27. Kandel, D. B., Single, E., & Kessler, R. (1976). The epidemiology of drug use among New York State high school students: Distribution, trends and change in rates of use. American Journal of Public Health, 66, 43-53.
28. Kaplan, H. B. (1985). Testing a general theory of drug abuse and other deviant adaptations. Journal of Drug Issues, 15, 477-492.
29. Kolonel, L. N., & Lee, J. (1981). Husband-wife correspondence in smoking, drinking, and dietary habits. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 34, 99-104.
30. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.
31. Mare, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56, 15-32.
32. McLeod, J. D. (1995). Social and psychological bases of homogamy for common psychiatric disorders. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 201-214.
33. Merikangas, K. R. (1982). Assortative mating for psychiatric disorders and psychological traits. Archives of General Psychiatry, 39, 1173-1180.
34. Merikangas, K. R., & Spiker, D. G. (1982). Assortative mating among in-patients with primary affective disorder. Psychological Medicine, 12, 753-764.
35. Peach, C. (1974). Homogamy, propinquity, and segregation: A reevaluation. American Sociological Review, 39, 636-641.
36. Penick, E. C., Powell, B. J., Bingham, S. F., Liskow, B. I., Miller, N. S., & Read, M. R. (1987). A comparative study of familial alcoholism. Journal of Studies on Alcoholism, 48, 136-146.
37. Pierce, J. P., Fiore, M. C., Novotny, T. E., Jatziandreu, E. J., & Davis, R. M. (1989). Trends in cigarette smoking in the United States: Educational differences are increasing. Journal of the American Medical Association, 261, 56-60.
38. Price, R. A., & Vandenberg, S. G. (1980). Spouse similarity in American and Swedish couples. Behavior Genetics, 10, 59-71.
39. Price, R. A., Chen, K. H., Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Models of spouse influence and their applications to smoking behavior. Social Biology, 28, 14-29.
40. Raftery, A. (1986). Choosing models for cross-classifications. American Journal of Sociology, 51, 145-146.
41. Rasch, G. (1966). An individualistic approach to item analysis. In P. F. Lazarsfeld, & M. W. Henry (Eds.), Readings in mathematical social science (pp. 89-107). Chicago: Science Research Associates.
42. Raschke, H. J. (1987). Divorce. In M. B. Sussman, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 597-624). New York: Plenum Press.
43. Scarr, S. (1988). How genotypes and environments combine: Development and individual differences. In N. Bolger, A. Caspi, G. Downey, & M. Moorehouse (Eds.), Persons in context: Developmental processes (pp. 217-244). New York: Cambridge University Press.
44. Schuckit, M. A. (1982). The importance of family history of affective disorder in a group of young men. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 70, 530-535.
45. Shiftman, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Coping and substance use. New York: Academic Press.
46. Shrout, P. E., & Kandel, D. B. (1981). Analyzing properties of dyads: Determinants of similarity of marijuana use in adolescent friendship dyads. Sociological Methods and Research, 9, 363-374.
47. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (1995). National Household Survey on Drug Abuse 1993: Main findings. Office of Applied Studies: Rockville, MD.
48. Sutton, G. C. (1980). Assortative mating for smoking habits. Annals of Human Biology, 7, 449-456.
49. Tambs, K., & Moum, T. (1992). No large convergence during marriage for health, lifestyle, and personality in a large sample of Norweigian spouses. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 957-971.
50. Vandenberg, S. G. (1972). Assortative mating, or who marries whom? Behavior Genetics, 2, 127-157.
51. Venters, M. H., Jacobs, D. R., Jr., Luepker, R. V., Maiman, L. A., & Gillum, R. F. (1984). Spouse concordance of smoking patterns: The Minnesota heart survey. American Journal of Epidemiology, 120, 608-616.
52. Winship, C., & Mare, R. D. (1989). Loglinear models with missing data: A latent class approach. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology (Vol. 19, pp. 299-230). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
53. Yamaguchi, K., & Kandel, D. B. (1985a). On the resolution of role incompatibility: A life event history analysis of family roles and marijuana use. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 1284-1325.
54. Yamaguchi, K., & Kandel, D. B. (1985b). Dynamic relationships between premarital cohabitation and illicit drug use: A life event history analysis of role selection and role socialization. American Sociological Review, 50, 530-546.
55. Yamaguchi, K., & Kandel, D. B. (1993). Marital homophily on illicit drug use among young adults: Assortative mating or marital influence. Social Forces, 72, 505-528.
56. Zablocki, B. (1989, September). A longitudinal study of drug use among former residents of communes. Paper presented at National Institute on Drug Abuse Technical Review on Longitudinal Studies of Drug Use. Washington, DC.