The reciprocal transfer of learning from journals to practice

Applied Psychology

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 201-211

  Latham, Gary P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040486973     PISSN: 0269994X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1464-0597.00054     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
2. Campbell, J.P., Dunnette, M.D., Lawler, E.E., & Weick, K.E. (1970). Managerial behavior, performance, and effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3. Dossett, D.L., Latham, G.P., & Mitchell, T.R. (1979). The effects of assigned versus participatively set goals, and individual differences when goal difficulty is held constant. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 291-298.
4. Fay, C.H., & Latham, G.P. (1982). Effects of training and rating scales on rating errors. Personnel Psychology, 35, 105-116.
5. Flanagan, J.C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358.
6. Frayne, C.A., & Latham, G.P. (1987). The application of social learning theory to employee self-management of attendance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 387-392.
7. Goldstein, A.P., & Sorcher, M. (1973). Changing managerial behavior by applied learning techniques. Training and Development Journal, 27, 36-39.
8. Kanfer, F.H. (1970). Self-monitoring: Methodological limitations and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35, 148-152.
9. Latham, G.P., & Baldes, J.J. (1975). The "practical significance" of Locke's theory of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 122-124.
10. Latham, G.P., & Dossett, D.L. (1978). Designing incentive plans for unionized employees: A comparison of continuous and variable ratio reinforcement schedules. Personnel Psychology, 31, 47-61.
11. Latham, G.P., Erez, M., & Locke, E.A. (1988). Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application to the Erez-Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 753-772.
12. Latham, G.P., & Frayne, C.A. (1989). Self-management training for increasing job attendance: A follow-up and a replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 411-416.
13. Latham, G.P., & Kinne, S.B. (1974). Improving job performance through training in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 187-191.
14. Latham, G.P., & Latham, S.D. (2000). Overlooking theory and research in performance appraisal at one's peril: Much done, more to do. In C. Cooper and E. Locke (Eds.), International review of industrial-organizational psychology. Chichester: Wiley.
15. Latham, G.P., & Mitchell, T.R. (1976). Behavioral criteria and potential reinforcers for the engineer/scientist in an industrial setting. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 6 (1), 316.
16. Latham, G., Mitchell, T.R., & Dossett, D.L. (1978). The importance of participative goal setting and anticipated rewards on goal difficulty and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 173-181.
17. Latham, G.P., & Saari, L.M. (1979a). Importance of supportive relationships in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 151-156.
18. Latham, G.P., & Saari, L.M. (1979b). The application of social learning theory to training supervisors through behavior modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 239-246.
19. Latham, G.P., & Saari, L.M. (1982). The importance of union acceptance for productivity improvement through goal setting. Personnel Psychology, 35, 781-787.
20. Latham, G.P., & Saari, L.M. (1984). Do people do what they say? Further studies on the situational interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 569-573.
21. Latham, G.P., Saari, L.M., Pursell, E.D., & Campion, M.A. (1980). The situational interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 422-427.
22. Latham, G.P., & Skarlicki, D.P. (1995). Criterion-related validity of the situational and patterned behavior description interviews with organizational citizenship behavior. Human Performance, 8, 67-80.
23. Latham, G.P., & Sue-Chan, C. (1999). A meta-analysis of the situational interview: An enumerative review of reasons for its validity. Canadian Psychology, 40, 56-67.
24. Latham, G.P., & Wexley, K.N. (1977). Behavioral observation scales for performance appraisal purposes. Personnel Psychology, 30, 255-268.
25. Latham, G.P., Wexley, K.N., & Pursell, E.D. (1975). Training managers to minimize rating errors in the observation of behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 550-555.
26. Latham, G.P., Wexley, K.N., & Rand, T.M. (1975). The relevance of behavioral criteria developed from the critical incident technique. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 7, 349-358.
27. Latham, G.P., Winters, D.C., & Locke, E.A. (1994). Cognitive and motivational effects of participation: A mediator study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 49-63.
28. Latham, G.P., & Yukl, G.A. (1975). Assigned versus participative goal setting with educated and uneducated woods workers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 299-302.
29. Latham, G.P., & Yukl, G.A. (1976). Effects of assigned and participative goal setting on performance and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 166-171.
30. Likert, R. (1967). The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31. Locke, E.A. (Ed.). (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3, 157-168.
32. Locke, E.A. (Ed.). (1986). Generalizing from laboratory to field settings: Research findings from industrial-organizational psychology, organizational behavior, and human resource management. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington.
33. Locke, E.A., & Latham, G.P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34. Locke, E.A., Shaw, K.M., Saari, L.M., & Latham, G.P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 125-152.
35. Millman, Z., & Latham, G.P. (2001). Increasing reemployment through training in verbal self-guidance. In M. Erez, U. Klienbeck, & K.K. Thierry (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
36. Porter, L.W. (1976). Discussant. In R.M. Steers (Chair), Contingencies in work related goal setting programs. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, September.
37. Pursell, E.D., Dossett, D.L., & Latham, G.P. (1980). Obtaining valid predictors by minimizing rating errors in the criterion. Personnel Psychology, 33, 91-96.
38. Rand, T.M., & Wexley, K.N. (1975). Demonstration of the effect, "similar to me", in simulated employment interviews. Psychological Reports, 36, 535-544.
39. Ronan, W.W., & Latham, G.P. (1974). The reliability and validity of the critical incident technique: A closer look. Studies in Personnel Psychology, 6, 53-64.
40. Ronan, W.W., Latham, G.P., & Kinne, S.B. (1973). Effects of goal setting and supervision on worker behavior in an industrial setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 302-307.
41. Ronan, W.W., & Prien, E.P. (1971). Perspectives on the measurement of human performance. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
42. Saari, L.M., & Latham, G.P. (1982). Employee reaction to continuous and variable ratio reinforcement schedules involving a monetary incentive. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 506-508.
43. Smith, P., & Kendall, L.M. (1963). Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47, 149-155.
44. Wernimont, P.F., & Campbell, J.P. (1968). Signs, samples, and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 372-376.
45. Wexley, K.N., Yukl, G.A., Kovacs, S.Z., & Sanders, R.E. (1972). Importance of contrast effects in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56 45-48.
46. Yukl, G.A., & Latham, G.P. (1975). Consequences of reinforcement schedules and incentive magnitudes for employee performance: Problems encountered in an industrial setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 294-298.
47. Yukl, G.A., & Latham, G.P. (1978). Interrelationships among employee participation, individual differences, goal difficulty, goal acceptance, goal instrumentality, and performance. Personnel Psychology, 31, 305-323.
48. Yukl, G.A., Latham, G.P., & Pursell, E.D. (1976). The effectiveness of performance incentives under continuous and variable ratio schedules of reinforcement. Personnel Psychology, 29, 221-231.
49. Yukl, G., Wexley, K.N., & Seymore, J.D. (1972). Effectiveness of pay incentives under variable ratio and continuous reinforcement schedules. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 19-23.