The Intellectualization of American Arts Education Policy

Arts Education Policy Review

Volumn 98, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 2-12

  Koroscik, Judith Smith ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040475486     PISSN: 10632913     EISSN: 19404395     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10632913.1997.9936389     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. C. B. Gee, “The Religion of Art and the Art of Righteousness,” Arts Education Policy Review 97, no. 3 (1996): 13.
2. S. S. Madeja ed.. The Arts, Cognition, and Basic Skills (St. Louis: CEMREL, 1978)
3. B. Reimer and R. A. Smith, eds., The Arts, Education and Aesthetic Knowing, 91st Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992).
4. H. S. Broudy, “On Cognition and Emotion in the Arts” in The Arts, Cognition, and Basic Skills, ed. S. S. Madeja (St. Louis: CEMREL, 1978). 18-22
5. M. Engel, “An Informal Framework for Cognitive Research in Arts Education,” in The Arts, Cognition, and Basic Skills, 23-30
6. H. Gardner, Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences (New York: Basic Books, 1983).
7. B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E.J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl, Tmonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain (New York: David McKay, 1956)
8. A. J. Harlow, A Taxonomy of the Psychomotor Domain (New York: David McKay, 1972)
9. D. R. Krathwohl, B. S. Bloom, and B. B. Masia, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 11: Affective Domain (New York: David McKay, 1964)
10. B. Reimer, “What Knowledge is of Most Worth in the Arts?’ in The Arts, Education, and Aesthetic Knowing, 20-50
11. M.J. Parsons, “Cognition as Interpretation in Art Education,” in The Arts, Education, and Aesthetic Knowing, 70-91
12. A. D. Efland, “The Spiral and the Lattice: Changes in Cognitive Learning Theory With Implications for Art Education,” Studies in Art Education 36, no. 3 (1995): 134-153.
13. H. Gardner, Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences (New York: Basic Books, 1983)
14. H. Gardner, Art Education and Human Development (Santa Monica, CA: J. Paul Getty Trust, 1990).
15. M. J. Parsons, How We Understand Art: A Cognitive Developmental Account of Aesthetic Experience (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987)
16. D. N. Perkins, “Art as an Occasion of Intelligence,” Educational Leadership 45. no. 4 (1988): 36-43
17. T. W. Tunks, “The Transfer of Music Learning,” in Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning, ed., R. Colwell (New York: MacMillan, 1992).
18. J. S. Koroscik, “Who Ever Said Studying Art Would Be Easy‘? The Growing Cognitive Demands of Understanding Works of Art in the Information Age,” Studies in Art Education 38, no. 1 (1996): 5-20.
19. E. W. Eisner, “Forms of Understanding and the Future of Educational Research,” Educational Researcher 22, no. 7 (1993)
20. M. V. Covington, Making the Grade: A Self- Worth Perspective on Motivation and School Reform (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992)
21. M. Csikszentmihalyi and U. Schiefele, “Arts Education, Human Development, and the Quality of Experience,” in The Arts, Education, and Aesthetic Knowing, 169-189
22. D. N. Perkins, The Intelligent Eye: Learning to Think by Looking at Art (Santa Monica, CA: J. Paul Getty Trust, 1994).
23. R. S. Prawat, “Promoting Access to Knowledge, Strategy, and Disposition in Students: A Research Synthesis,” Review of Educational Research 59, no. 1 (1989): 1-41.
24. M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, and M. J. Farr, eds., The Nature of Expertise Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988
25. D. N. Perkins and G. Saloman, “Teaching for Transfer,” Educational Leadership 46, no. I (1988): 22-32
26. G. Saloman and D. N. Perkins, “Rocky Roads to Transfer: Rethinking Mechanisms of a Neglected Phenomenon,” Educational Psychologist 24, no. 2 (1989): 113-142.
27. G. M. Ambach, “Education Reform In and Through the Arts,” in Perspectives on Education Reform: Arts Education as Catalyst (Santa Monica, CA: J. Paul Getty Trust, 1993): 8-10
28. M. Csikszentmihalyi, “How to Measure ‘Warding off Chaos,”’ The Institute View (New York: Lincoln Center Institute. Summer 1996): 7.
29. J. D. and C. T. MacArthur Foundation, Request for Proposals: Higher Order Thinking, Learning in and or Through the Arts (Chicago: MacArthur Foundation, 1996)
30. J. Risklind, “Education in Crisis, IBM Chief Warns,” The Columbus Dispatch, 7 February 1996, 3A.
31. M. L. Walshok, Knowledge Without Boundaries: What America’s Research Universities Can Do for the Economy. the Workplace, and the Community (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995).
32. T. Bender, Intellect and Public Life: Essays on the Social History of Academic Intellectuals in the United States (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1993).
33. T. Bender, Intellect and Public Life: Essays on the Social History of Academic Intellectuals in the United States (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1993). 7-8
34. T. Bender, Intellect and Public Life: Essays on the Social History of Academic Intellectuals in the United States (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1993). 37
35. T. Bender, Intellect and Public Life: Essays on the Social History of Academic Intellectuals in the United States (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1993). 43-44
36. T. Bender, Intellect and Public Life: Essays on the Social History of Academic Intellectuals in the United States (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1993). 10
37. D. Neklin, Dorothy, “What Are the Science Wars Really About?’ The Chronicle of Higher Education, 26 July 1996, A52
38. W. Grimes, “Art Critics Meet to Criticize Each Other’s Criticism,” The New York Times 18 May 1996, 12.
39. B. Zuck, “Poll on Arts Support Good News for NEA,” The Columbus Dispatch, 16 June 1996.
40. G. Geahigan, “The Arts in Education: A Historical Perspective,” in The Arts, Education, and Aesthetic Knowing, 1-19
41. J. A. Stinespring, “DBAE and Criticism,” Arts Education Policy Review 94, no. 2 (1992): 20-25.
42. R. S. Prawat and R. E. Floden, “Philosophical Perspectives on Constructivist Views of Learning, Educational Psychology 29, no. 1 (1994): 3743.
43. R. S. Prawat, “Teachers’ Beliefs About Teaching and Learning: A Constructivist Perspective,” American Journal of Education (May 1992): 354-95.
44. J. S. Brown, P. Duguid, “Universities in the Digital Age,” Change 28, no. 4 (1996): 13
45. S. Viadero, “Mix and Match: The Experimental Schools for Thought Combine Three Promising Cognitive-Learning Approaches to Promote Deep and True Understanding,” Education Week, 17 January 1996, 27.
46. S. Viadero, “Mix and Match: The Experimental Schools for Thought Combine Three Promising Cognitive-Learning Approaches to Promote Deep and True Understanding,” Education Week, 17 January 1996, 28