The use of ecological risk assessment to undermine implementation of good public policy

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment (HERA)

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 238-242

  Pagel, Joel E ^a   O'Brien, Mary ^b  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b Environmental Research Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040440288     PISSN: 10807039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10807039609383601     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Ehrenfeld, D. 1981. The Arrogance of Humanism. Oxford, England, Oxford University Press.
2. FEMAT. 1993. Forest Ecosystem Management; An Ecological, Economic and Social Assessment. Report of the Forest Ecosystem Management Assessment Team, USFS, USFWS, USNPS, EPA, NOAA, and USBLM, Portland, OR.
3. Lackey, R.T. 1996. Is ecological risk assessment useful for resolving complex ecological problems? In: Stouder, D.J., Bisson, P.A., and Naiman, R.J. (Eds). Pacific Salmon and their ecosystem: Status and future options. New York, Chapman and Hall, Inc.
4. Meffe, G.K. 1992. Techno-arrogance and halfway technologies: salmon hatcheries on the Pacific Coast of north America. Conserv. Biol. 6, 350-354.
5. Pitkin, D. and Lowe, R. 1995. Distribution, Abundance and Ecology of Aleutian Canada Geese in Oregon and Washington, 13 Oct. - 1 May, 1995. Activity Report. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newport, OR.
6. ROD. 1994. Record of Decision for Amendments to Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management Planning Documents within the Range of the Northern Spotted Owl. U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Bureau of Land Management, Portland, OR.
7. Willson, M.F. and Halupka, K.C. 1995. Anadromous fish as keystone species in vertebrate communities. Conserv. Biol. 9, 489-497.