Language dependency in parsing: Evidence from monolingual and bilingual processing

Psychologica Belgica

Volumn 38, Issue 3-4, 1998, Pages 197-230

  Fernández, Eva M ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040427744     PISSN: 00332879     EISSN: 2054670X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1981). Second language acquisition from a functionalist perspective: Pragmatic, semantic, and perceptual strategies. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 379, 190-214. New York, NY: New York Academy of Sciences Press.
2. Bradley, D.C., Sánchez-Casas, R.M., & García-Albea, J.E. (1993). The status of the syllable in the perception of Spanish and English. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 197-233.
3. Brysbaert, M., & Mitchell, D.C. (1996). Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 664-695.
4. Carreiras, M. (1992). Estrategias de análisis sintáctico en el procesamiento de frases: Cierre temprano versus cierre tardío. Cognitiva, 4, 1, 3-27.
5. Carreiras, M., & Clifton, C. (1993). Relative clause interpretation preferences in Spanish and English. Language and Speech, 36, 353-372.
6. Clahsen, H., & Hong, U. (1995). Agreement and null subjects in German L2 development: New evidence from reaction-time experiments. Second Language Research, 11, 57-87.
7. Clifton, C. (1988). Restrictions on late closure: appearance and reality. Paper presented at the Sixth Australian Language and Speech Conference, University of South Wales, Sidney, August 19-21, 1988.
8. Corley, M. (1995). The role of statistics in human sentence processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter.
9. Cuetos, F., & Mitchell, D.C. (1988). Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the Late Closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30, 73-105.
10. Cuetos, F., Mitchell, D.C., & Corley, M.M.B. (1996). Parsing in different languages. In M. Carreiras, J.E. García-Albea, & N. Sebastián-Gallés (Eds.), Language processing in Spanish (pp. 145-187) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Cutler, A., Mehler, J., Norris, D., & Seguí, J. (1992). The monolingual nature of speech segmentation by bilinguals. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 381-410.
12. De Bot, K. (1992). A bilingual production model: Levelt's speaking model adapted. Applied Linguistics, 13, 1-24.
13. De Vincenzi, M., & Job, R. (1993). Some observations on the universality of the Late-Closure strategy. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 189-206.
14. Eubank, L. (1993). Sentence matching and processing in L2 development. Second Language Research, 9, 253-280.
15. Fernández, E.M. (1995). Processing strategies in second language acquisition: Some preliminary results. Paper presented at GASLA '95, to appear B.C. Klein & G. Martohardjono (Eds.), The development of second language grammars. John Benjamins Publishers.
16. Fernández, E.M. (1996). Syntactic processing in bilinguals. Second examination: literature Review Document. CUNY Graduate School and University Center, New York, NY.
17. Fernández, E.M. (in progress). Bilingual sentence processing. Doctoral dissertation, CUNY Graduate School and University Center, New York, NY.
18. Fernández, E.M., & Hirose, Y. (1997). Bilingual sentence processing: Off-line results. Paper presented at the Advanced Second Language Acquisition Seminar, May 15, 1997, CUNY Graduate School and University Center, New York, NY.
19. Ferreira, P., & Fodor, J.D. (1998). Reanalysis in sentence processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
20. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind: An essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Fodor, J.D. (1998). Learning to parse and parsing to learn. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.
22. Frazier, L. (1978). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
23. Frazier, L. (1990). Parsing modifiers: Special purpose routines in the human sentence processing mechanism? In D. A. Balota, G.B. Flores d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 303-330). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1996). Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Frazier, L., & Fodor, J.D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291-326.
26. Frenck-Mestre, C. (1998). Examining second language reading: An on-line look. In preparation.
27. Frenck-Mestre, C., & Pynte, J. (1997). Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 504, 119-148.
28. Garrett, M.F. (1988). Processes in sentence production. In F. Newmeyer (Ed.), The Cambridge linguistics survey: Vol. 3. Biological and social factors (pp. 69-69). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
29. Garrett, M.F. (1988). Sentence processing. In D. Osherson & H. Lasnik (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. i/1 ). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Gass, S. (1979). Sentence processing by L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 85-98.
31. Gibson, E. (1992). On the adequacy of the Competition Model. Language, 68, 4, 812-830.
32. Gibson, E., & Pearlmutter, N.J. (1994). A corpus-based analysis of psycholinguistic constraints on prepositional-phrase attachment. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence processing (pp. 181-198). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Gibson, E., & Schütze, C.T. (1996). The relationship between the frequency and the perceived complexity of conjunction attachments: On-line evidence. Poster presented at the Ninth Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, NY.
34. Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N., Canseco-González, E., & Hickok, G. (1996). Recency preference in the human sentence processing mechanism. Cognition, 59, 23-59.
35. Gilboy, E., & Sopena, J.M. (1996). Segmentation effects in the processing of complex NPs with relative clauses. In M. Carreiras, J. García-Albea, & N. Sebastián-Gallés (Eds.), Language processing in Spanish (pp. 191-206). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Gilboy, E., Sopena. J.M., Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (1995). Argument structure and preferences in the processing of Spanish and English complex NPs. Cognition, 54, 131-1677.
37. Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Speech Acts (Syntax and Semantics, 3, pp. 41-58). New York, NY: Academic Press.
38. Harrington, M., & Sawyer, M. (1992). Working memory capacity and L2 reading skill. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 25-38.
39. Hemforth, B., Konieczny, L., & Scheepers, C. (1996). Syntactic and anaphoric processes in modifier attachment. Poster presented at the Ninth Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, NY.
40. Hernández, A.E., Bates, E.A., & Avila, L.X. (1994). On-line sentence interpretation in Spanish-Einglish bilinguals: What does it mean to be "in between"? Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 417-446.
41. Hirose, Y., Fodor, J.D., & Inoue, A. (1997). Adjunct attachment ambiguity resolution: The role of constituent weight. Unpublished manuscript, CUNY Graduate School and University Center, New York, NY.
42. Igoa, J.M. (1995). Parsing decisions and the Construal Hypothesis: Attachment preferences in primary phrases in Spanish. Paper presented at the Second Symposium on Psycholinguistics, Tarragona, Spain.
43. Igoa, J.M. (1996). A study on late closure in Spanish: Computationally-grounded frequency-based accounts of attachment preferences. Poster presented at the Ninth Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, New York, NY.
44. Kamide, Y., & Mitchell. D.C. (1997). Relative clause attachment: Nondeterminism in Japanese parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 247-254.
45. Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Liu, H., Bates, E., & Li, P. (1992). Sentence interpretation in bilingual speakers of English and Chinese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 451-484.
47. MacWhinney, B. (1997). Second language acquisition and the Competition Model. In A.M.B. De Groot, & J.F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 113-142). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. McPartland-Fairman, P. (1989). The processing of phrasal verbs by native and non-native speakers of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York, NY: CUNY Graduate School and University Center.
49. Mitchell, D.C. (1994). Sentence parsing. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 375-409). New York, NY: Academic Press.
50. Mitchell, D.C., & Brysbaert, M. (1998). Challenges to recent theories of cross-linguistic variation in parsing: Evidence from Dutch. In D. Hillert (Ed.), Sentence processing: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York, NY: Academic Press.
51. Mitchell, D.C., & Cuetos, F. (1991). The origins of parsing strategies. In C. Smith (Ed.), Current issues in natural language processing (pp. 1-12). Center for Cognitive Science, University of Austin, TX.
52. Mitchell, D.C., Cuetos, F., Corley, M.M.B., & Brysbaert, M. (1995). Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (non-lexical) statistical records. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 469-488.
53. Mitchell, D.C., Cuetos, F., & Zagar, D. (1990). Reading in different languages: Is there a universal mechanism for parsing sentences? In D.A. Balota, G.B. Flores d'Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 285-302). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Poulisse, N. (1997). Language production in bilinguals. In A.M.B. De Groot & J.F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 201-224). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Sasaki, Y. (1994). Paths of processing strategy transfers in learning Japanese and English as foreign languages: A competition model approach. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 43-72.
56. Zagar, D., Pynte, J., & Rativeau, S. (1997). Evidence for early closure attachment on first-pass reading times in French. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 421-438.