Using the demand for hunting licences to evaluate contingent valuation estimates of willingness to pay

Applied Economics Letters

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 2000, Pages 435-438

  Loomis, John ^a   Pierce, Cynthia ^b   Manfredo, Mike ^b  

^a Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040360767     PISSN: 13504851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/135048500351122     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bishop, R. and Heberlein, T. (1979) Measuring values of extra market goods: are indirect measures biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, 926-30.
2. Carson, R., Flores, N., Martin, K. and Wright, J. (1996) Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: comparing estimates for quasi-public goods, Land Economics, 72, 80-99.
3. Hanemann, M. (1984) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66, 332-41.
4. Hanemann, M. (1989) With discrete response data: reply, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71, 1057-61.
5. Mitchell, R. and Carson, R. (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future, Resources for the Future, Washington DC.
6. Park, T., Loomis, J. and Creel, M. (1991) Confidence intervals for evaluating benefit estimates from dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies, Land Economics, 67, 64-73.
7. Welsh, M. (1986) Exploring the accuracy of the contingent valuation method: comparison with simulated markets, PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.