The work of government: Recovering the discourse of office in marbury v. madison

Studies in American Political Development

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 1994, Pages 60-80

  Orren, Karen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040310590     PISSN: 0898588X     EISSN: 14698692     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0898588X00000055     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Stephen G. Breyer and Richard B. Stewart, Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy (Boston: Little Brown, 1992), 120 ff. and 20-22.
2. Bruce Ackerman's “Time Two” in We The People: Foundation (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991).
3. J.C. Sainty, “The Tenure of Offices in the Exchequer,” 116 English Historical Review (1965), 449-475.
4. John Brooke, King George III (Constable & Constable, 1972).
5. K.W. Swart, Sale of Offices in the Seventeenth Century (Utrecht: Hess, 1980).
6. O.E. Aylmer, The Kingy's Servants; The Civil Service of Charles 1, 1625-1642 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1961), 89.
7. Edward Coke, The Fourth part of the Institutes of the Laws of England (London: E. and R. Brooke, 1797).
8. William Holdsworth, History of English Law (London: Methuen, 1914) vol. X, 500.
9. W.C. Richardson, Tudor Chamber Administration, 1485-1547 (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University, 1952).
10. G.R. Elton, The Tudor Revolution in Government: Administrative Changes in the Reign of Henry VIII (Cambridge University Press, 1953).
11. George Louis Beer, The Old Colonial System: 1660-1754 (New York: Macmillan, 1912), vol. 1, 284, 292.
12. S.A. DeSmith, “The Prerogative Writs,” 1 Cambridge Law Journal 40 (1951), 45-47.
13. Harold Weintraub, “English Origins of Judicial Review By Prerogative Writ: Certiorari and Mandamus,” 9 New York Law Forum 478 (1963), 504 ff.
14. Edward Jenks, “The Prerogative Writs in English Law,” 32 Yale Law Journal 524 (1927), 530.
15. Thomas Tapping, The Law and Practice of the High Prerogative Writ of Mandamus (Philadelphia: T. & J.W. Johnson, 1853), 226.
16. Theodore F.W. Plucknett, A Concise History of the Common Law (Boston: Little Brown, 1956), 477.
17. Frederick Pollock and Frederic William Maitland, The History of English Law Before the Time of Edward I (Cambridge University Press, 1968, vol. 2, 532.
18. Robert G. McCloskey, The American Supreme Court (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960), 40.
19. James Bradley, Cases on Constitutional Law, part I (Cambridge: Charles W. Sever, 1894), 107-114.
20. Geoffrey R. Stone, Louis M. Seidman, Cass R. Sunnstein, and Mark V. Tushnet, Constitutional Law (Boston: Little Brown, 1991), 21-29.
21. Alpheus Thomas Mason and Donald Grier Stephenson, Jr., American Constitutional Law, 10th ed. (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1993), 55-58.
22. George Lee Haskins, Foundations of Power: John Marshall, 1801-15, part one (New York, Macmillan, 1981), 204.
23. James M. O'Fallon, “Marbury,” 44 Stanford Law Review 219 (1992), 252 ff.
24. Jack A. Garraty, ed., Quarrels That Have Shaped the Constitution (New York: Harper & Row, 1962), 1.
25. Henry P. Monaghan, “Marbury and the Administrative State,” 83, Columbia Law Review, 1 (1983).
26. Karen Orren, “Labor Regulation and Constitutional Theory,” 22 Political Theory 98 (1994).
27. Sylvia Snowiss, Judicial Review and the Law of the Constitution (Yale University Press, 1990).
28. Frederick S. Calhoun, The Lawmen; United States Marshals and their Deputies, 1789-1989 (Washington: Smithsonian Institution, 1990).