Stability and change of unidimensionality: The sample case of deductive reasoning

Journal of Adolescent Research

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 150-168

  Spiel, Christiane ^a   Glück, Judith ^b   Gössler, Heimo ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040289944     PISSN: 07435584     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0743558401162003     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317-332.
2. Andersen, E. B. (1973). A goodness of fit test for the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 38, 123-140.
3. Berk, L. E. (1993). Infants, children, and adolescents. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
4. Bond, T. G. (1995). Piaget and Measurement I: The Twain really do meet. Archives de Psychologie, 63, 71-87.
5. Chazan, D. (1993). High school geometry students' justification for their views of empirical evidence and mathematical proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24, 359-387.
6. DeLisi, R., & Staudt, J. (1980). Individual differences in college students' performance on formal operational tasks. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 1, 201-208.
7. de Ribaupierre, A., Rieben, L., & Lautrey, J. (1991). Developmental change and individual differences: A longitudinal study using Piagetian tasks. Psychology Monographs, 117, 287-311.
8. Dugan, C. M., & Revlin, R. (1990). Response options and presentation format as contributors to conditional reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 829-848.
9. Evans, J.S.B.T. (1993). The mental model theory of conditional reasoning: critical appraisal and revision. Cognition, 48, 1-20.
10. Fischer, G. H., & Molenaar, I. W. (Eds.). (1995). Rasch models - Foundations, recent developments, and applications. New York: Springer.
11. Formann, A. K. (1981). Über die Verwendung von Items als Teilungskriterium für Modellkontrollen im Modell von Rasch [On the use of test items as splitting criteria for testing the fit of the Rasch model]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 28, 541-560.
12. Glück, J., & Indurkhya, A. (2001). Assessing the longitudinal salience of items in constructs. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 169-188.
13. Glück, J., & Spiel, C. (1997). Item response models for repeated measures designs: Application and limitations of four different approaches. Methods of Psychological Research, 2 [Online journal]. Available: http://www.pabst-publishers.de/mpr/issue2/art1/.
14. Griggs, R. A., & Cox, J. R. (1982). The elusive thematic-materials effect in Wason's selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 407-420.
15. Haars, V.J.E., & Mason, E. J. (1986). Children's understanding of class inclusion and their ability to reason with implication. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 45-63.
16. Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.
17. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1999). Deductive reasoning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 109-135.
18. Kodroff, J. K., & Roberge, J. J. (1975). Developmental analysis of the conditional reasoning abilities of primary-grade children. Developmental Psychology, 11, 21-28.
19. Markovits, H. (1984). Awareness of the 'possible' as a mediator of formal thinking in conditional reasoning problems. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 367-376.
20. Martin-Löf, P. (1973). Statistika modeller [Statistical models]. Anteckningar från seminarier lasåret 1969-1970, utarbetade av Rolf Sundberg. Obetydligt ändrat nytryck, Oktober 1973. Stockholm: Institutet för Försäkringsmatematik och matematisk Statistisk vis Stockholms Universitet.
21. Neimark, E. D. (1975). Longitudinal development of formal operations thought. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 91, 171-225.
22. Neimark, E. D. (1982). Adolescent thought: Transition to formal operations. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 486-499). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23. Oaksford, M., & Stenning, K. (1992). Reasoning with conditionals containing negated constituents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 835-854.
24. Overton, W. F., & Meehan, A. M. (1982). Individual differences in formal operational thought: Sex role and learned helplessness. Child Development, 53, 1536-1543.
25. Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15, 1-12.
27. Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (Expanded ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
28. Rips, L. J. (1994). The psychology of proof. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Roberge, J. J. (1976). Developmental analyses of two formal operational structures: Combinatorial thinking and conditional reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 12, 563-564.
30. Rost, J. (1990). Rasch models in latent classes: An integration of two approaches in item analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 271-282.
31. Rost, J. (1996). Lehrbuch Testtheorie Testkonstruktion [Textbook of test theory and test construction]. Bern: Hans Huber.
32. Rost, J., & von Davier, M. (1995). Mixture distribution Rasch models. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenaar (Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments, and applications (pp. 257-268). New York: Springer.
33. Spiel, C. (1995). Re-Analyse eines Entwicklungstests - Ein Vorgehen zur Kompensierung der Methodenveralterung bei Längsschnittstudien [Re-analysis of developmental tests - A procedure to overcome aging of measurement instruments in longitudinal studies]. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 27, 374-385.
34. Spiel, C. (1999). A strategy for data reanalysis in longitudinal studies. In R. K. Silbereisen & A. von Eye (Eds.), Growing up in times of social change (pp. 245-260). Berlin: de Gruyter.
35. Spiel, C., Gittler, G., Sirsch, U., & Glück, J. (1997). Application of the Rasch model for testing Piaget's theory of cognitive development. In R. Langeheine & J. Rost (Eds.), Applications of latent trait and latent class models in the social sciences (pp. 111-117). Waxmann, Germany: Münster.
36. Spiel, C., & Glück, J. (1998). Item-response models for assessing change in dichotomous items. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22, 517-536.
37. Staudenmeyer, H., & Bourne, L. E. (1977). Learning to interpret conditional sentences: A developmental study. Developmental Psychology, 13, 616-623.
38. Stauder, J.E.A. (1992). Event related brain potentials and cognitive development during childhood (Academisch Proefschrift). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
39. van der Maas, H. L., & Molenaar, P. C. (1991). Stagewise cognitive development: An application of catastrophe theory. Psychological Review, 99, 395-417.
40. von Davier, M. (1996). Methoden zur Prüfung probabilistischer Testmodelle [Methods for testing the fit of probabilistic test models]. Kiel, Germany: Institut für die Pädagogik der Natur-wis-sen-schaften.
41. Wason, P. C., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). The psychology of deduction: structure and content. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Wildman, T. M., & Fletcher, H. J. (1977). Developmental increases and decreases in solutions of conditional syllogism problems. Developmental Psychology, 13, 630-636.