Gifted and Non-Selected Children's Perceptions of Academic Achievement, Academic Effort, and Athleticism

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 211-219

  Udvari, Stephen J ^a   Rubin, Kenneth H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040224383     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001698629604000406     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Austin, A. B., & Draper, D. C. (1981). Peer relationships of the academically gifted: A review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 129-133.
2. Butler-Por, N. (1993). Underachieving gifted students. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 649-668). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
3. Chandler, T. J. L., & Goldberg, A. D. (1990). The academic all-American as vaunted adolescent role-identity. Sociology of Sport Journal, 7, 287-293.
4. Chen, X., Rubin, K. H., & Sun, Y. (1992). Social reputation and peer relationships in Chinese and Canadian children: A cross-cultural study. Child Development, 63, 1336-1343.
5. Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1988). Multiple sources of data on social behavior and social status in the school: A cross-age comparison. Child Development, 59, 815-829.
6. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Kupersmidt, J. B. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood, (pp. 17-59). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Coleman, J. S. (1960). The adolescent subculture and academic achievement. The American Journal of Sociology, 65, 337-347.
8. Dodge, K. A. (1983). Behavioral antecedents of peer social status. Child Development, 54, 1386-1399.
9. Durkin, K. (1995). Developmental social psychology: From infancy to old age. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
10. Ford, M. A. (1989). Students' perceptions of affective issues impacting the social emotional development and school performance of gifted/talented youngsters. Roeper Review, 11(3), 131-135.
11. Hartup, W. W. (1983). Peer relations. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), P.H. Mussen (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol.4. Socialization, personality, and social development. (pp. 103-196). New York: Wiley.
12. Kerr, B. (1991). Educating gifted girls. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 402-415). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13. Masten, A. S., Morison, P., & Pellegrini, D. S. (1985). A revised class play method of peer assessment. Developmental Psychology, 21, 523-533.
14. Ontario Ministry of Education. (1984). Programming for the gifted. Toronto: Ministry of Education.
15. Parker, J. G., Rubin, K. H., Price, J. M., & DeRosier, M. E. (1995). Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment: A developmental psychopathology perspective. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 2: Risk, disorder, and adaptation. (pp. 93-161). New York: Wiley.
16. Perleth, C., & Heller, K. A. (1994). The Munich longitudinal study of giftedness. In R. F. Subotnik & K. D. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent. (pp. 77-114). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
17. Renzulli, J. S. (1986). A three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. A. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness, (pp. 53-92). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18. Rubin, K. H., & Coplan, R. (1992). Peer relationships in childhood. In M. H. Bornstein & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (3rd Ed., pp. 519-578). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Rubin, K. H., Lynch, D., Coplan, R., Rose-Krasnor, L., & Booth, C. L. (1994). "Birds of a feather...": Behavioral concordances and preferential personal attraction in children. Child Development, 65, 1778-1785.
20. Rubin, K. H., & Mills, R. S. L. (1988). The many faces of social isolation in childhood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 916-924.
21. Schneider, B. H. (1987). The gifted child in peer group perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.
22. Schneider, B. H., Clegg, M. R., Byrne, B. M., Ledingham, J. E., & Crombie, G. (1989). Social relations of gifted children as a function of age and school program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 48-56.
23. Sternberg, R. J. (1991). Giftedness according to the triarchic theory of human intelligence. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education, (pp. 45-54). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
24. Stevenson, H. W., Lee, S. Y., Chen, C., Stigler, J. W., Hsu, C. C., & Kitamura, S. (1990). Contexts of achievement. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 55(1-2, Serial No. 221).
25. Stevenson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The learning gap: Why our schools ore failing and what we can learn from Japanese and Chinese education. New York, NY: Summit Books.
26. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1962). Adolescent attitudes toward academic brilliance. Talented Youth Project Monograph. New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
27. Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: MacMillan.
28. Terman, L. M. (1925). Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Genetic Studies of Genius, (Vol. I). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
29. Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1947). The gifted child grows up: Twenty-five years' follow up of a superior group. Genetic Studies of Genius, (Vol. IV). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
30. Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H. (1959). The gifted group at mid-life: Thirty-five years' follow-up of the superior child. Genetic Studies of Genius, (Vol. V). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.