Apples and oranges? Comparing the attitudes of public policy versus public administration students

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 77-91

  De Soto, William ^a   Opheim, Cynthia ^a   Tajalli, Hassan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040216314     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/02750749922064283     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Averch, H., & Dluhy, M. (1991). Teaching public administration, public management, and policy analysis: Convergence or divergence in the master's core? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 11(3), 541-551.
2. Buchanan, B. (1976). Work values of prospective public servants. Unpublished memo. Department of Government, University of Texas.
3. Crecine, J. P. (1982). Introduction and overview. In J. P. Crecine (Ed.), The new educational programs in public policy: The first decade (pp. 1-23). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
4. Elmore, R. F. (1986). Graduate education in public management: Working the seams of government. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 6(1), 69-83.
5. Fredrickson, H. G. (1990). Public administration as social equity. Public Administration Review, 50(2), 228-237.
6. Gurel, L. (1975). The human side of evaluating human service programs. In M. Guttentag & E. L. Struening (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation research (Vol. 2, pp. 11-28). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7. Heineman, R. A., Bluhm, W. T., Peterson, S. A., & Dearny, E. N. (1990). The world of the policy analyst: Rationality, values, and politics. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
8. Lowery, D., & Whitaker, G. P. (1991). Comparing the public administration and policy analysis approaches to public service education: A skeptical inquiry. Paper presented at the National Public Management Research Conference, Syracuse University.
9. Lowery, D., & Whitaker, G. P. (1994). Comparing public administration and policy analysis approaches to public service education. American Review of Public Administration, 24(1), 25-41.
10. Lynn, L. E., Jr. (1987). Managing public policy. Boston: Little, Brown.
11. Lynn, L. E., Jr. (1996). Public management as art, science, and profession. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
12. Marini, F. (1971). Toward a new public administration: The Minnowbrook perspective. Scranton, PA: Chandler.
13. National Association of Schools of Public Affairs and Administration (NASPAA). (1981). Standards of professional master degree programs in public affairs. Washington, DC: Author.
14. Roeder, P.W., & Whitacker, G. (1993). Education for the public service: Policy analysis and administration in the MPA core curriculum. Administration and Society, 24(4), 512-540.
15. Russell, J. R. (1982). Management in the public sector. In J. P. Crecine (Ed.), The new educational programs in public policy: The first decade (pp. 103-130). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
16. Stanley, D. (1964). The higher civil service. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
17. Stillman, R. J. (1991). Preface to public administration: A search for themes and direction. New York: St. Martin's.
18. Stokes, D. E. (1982). General skills in public policy programs. In J. P. Crecine (Ed.), The new educational programs in public policy: The first decade (pp. 157-174). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
19. Waldo, D. (1990). A theory of public administration means in our time a theory of politics also. In N. B. Lynn & A. Wildavsky (Eds.), Public administration: The state of the discipline (pp. 73-83). Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
20. Warner, W. L. (1963). The American federal executive. New Haven, CT: Yale.
21. Weiss, C. H. (1972). Evaluation research: Method for assessing program effectiveness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.