Maastricht Convergence in the Social and Christian Democratic Heartland: Sweden and Germany

International Journal of Political Economy

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 85-123

  Ryner, Magnus ^a  

^a EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040192239     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15580970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08911916.1998.11643966     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Aglietta, Michel., “The Creation of International Liquidity.” In Loukas, Tsoukalis (ed.), The Political Economy of International Money. London: Sage, 1985.
2. Alber, Jens., “Germany.” In Peter, Flora (ed.), Growth to Limits, vol. 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1986.
3. Amin, Ash., “Post-Fordism: Models, Fantasies, and Phantoms of Transition.” In Ash, Amin (ed.), Post-Fordism: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.
4. Amin, Ash, and Malmberg, Anders. “Competing Structural and Institutional Influences on the Geography of Production in Europe.” In Ash, Amin (ed.), Post-Fordism: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.
5. Andersson, Thomas., “Utlandsinvesteringar och policy-implikationer.” Nya villkor for ekonomi och politik, SOU 16, no. 1 (1993).
6. Boyer, Robert., “Flexibility: Many Forms, Uncertain Effects.” Labor and Society, 12, no. 1 (1987).
7. Boyer, Robert, ed. The Search for Labor Flexibility. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.
8. Boyer, Robert., “The Capital–Labor Relations in OECD Countries: From the Fordist Golden Age to Contrasted National Trajectories.” Mimeo, WIDER, 1989.
9. Boyer, Robert., “The Impact of the Single Market on Labor and Employment: A Discussion of Macro-Economic Approaches in the Light of Research in Labor Economics.” Labor and Society, 15, no. 2 (1990).
10. Boyer, Robert., “The Eighties: The Search for Alternatives to Fordism.” In Bob, Jessop, Hans, Kastendiek, Klaus, Nielsen, and Owe, Pedersen (eds.), The Politics of Flexibility. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar, 1991.
11. Clement, Wallace., “Continentalization and Regime Change: Labor, Capital and the State in Sweden and Canada.” Mimeo. Paper presented at the First Annual Meeting of SCAF, Toronto, 1992.
12. Clement, Wallace., “Global Perestroika.” In Ralph, Miliband, and Leo, Panitch (eds.), Socialist Register. London: Merlin Press, 1992.
13. Czada, Roland., “Der Kampf um die Finanzierung der deutschen Einheit.” Discussion paper, Max Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, 1995.
14. Davis, Mike., “The Political Economy of Late Imperial America.” New Left Review, 143 (1984).
15. Deeg, Richard., “Banks and Industrial Finance in the 1990s.” Industry and Innovation, 4, no. 1 (1997).
16. Deubner, Christian., “Die Wiedervereinigung der Deutschen und die Europäische Gemeinschaft.” In Georg, Simonis (ed.), Das Modell Deutschland in der neuen Weltordnung. Opladen: Leske and Budrich, 1997.
17. Deubner, Christian,; Rehfeld, Udo,; and Schlupp, Frieder., “Franco-German Relations within the International Division of Labor: Interdependence, Divergence or Structural Dominance?” In In William, Graf (ed.) The Internationalization of the German Political Economy: Evolution of a Hegemonic Project. New York, St. Martin’s Press, 1992.
18. Dow, Sheila., “European Monetary Integration and the Distribution of Credit Availability.” In Stuart, Corbridge, Ron, Martin, and Nigel, Thrift (eds.), Money, Power and Space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1994.
19. European Commission. Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs. “One Market, One Money: An Evaluation of the Potential Benefits and Costs of Forming an Economic and Monetary Union.” European Economy, 36 (1990).
20. Erixon, Lennart., “Rehnmeidnermodellen: En tredje vag i den ekonomiska Politiken.” Arbetslivscentrum. Research Report, 4 (1994).
21. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta., The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity, 1990.
22. Esser, Josef., “Bank Power in Germany Revisited.” West European Politics, 13, no. 4 (1990).
23. Esser, Josef., “Modell Deutschland in den 90er Jahren—Wie stabil ist der soziale Konsens?.” In Georg, Simonis (ed.), Das Modell Deutschland in der neuen Weltordnung. Opladen: Leske and Budrich, 1997.
24. Esser, Josef,; Fach, Wolfgang,; and Simonis, Georg., “Grenzproblemen des ‘Modell Deutschland’.” Prokla, 40, no. 3 (1980).
25. Fisher, Andrew., “EMU Requires Political Union Says Tietmeyer.” Financial Times (November 4–5, 1996), p. 2.
26. Ganssmann, Heiner., “Soziale Sicherheit als Standortsproblem.” Prokla, 106 (1997).
27. Germain, Randall., “Regionalism and Finance: A Conceptual Approach.” Competition and Change, 1 (1996).
28. Gill, Stephen., “The Emerging World Order and European Change.” In Ralph, Miliband, and Leo, Panitch (eds.), The Socialist Register 1992. London: Merlin Press, 1992.
29. Gill, Stephen., “Structural Changes in Multilateralism.” Mimeo, Lausanne, MUNS/UNU Symposium, 1994.
30. Gill, Stephen., “An Emu or an Ostrich? EMU and Neoliberal Economic Integration; Limits and Alternatives.” In Petri, Minkkinen, and Heikki, Patomäki (eds.), The Politics of Economic and Monetary Union. Helsinki: Ulkopoliittinen Instituutti, 1997.
31. Gossweiler, Kurt., Grossbanken, Industriemonopole, Staat. Berlin: Das Europäische Buch, 1971.
32. Graf, William., “Introduction.” In William, Graf (ed.), The Internationalization of the German Political Economy: Evolution of a Hegemonic Project. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992.
33. Hall, Stuart, and Schwartz, B., The Hard Road to Renewal. London: Verso, 1988.
34. Harmes, Adam., “Privatizing Hegemony.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association, Toronto, 1997.
35. Harvey, David., The Condition of Postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.
36. Holman, Otto., “Transnational Class Strategy and the New Europe.” International Journal of Political Economy, 22, no. 1 (1992).
37. Hueglin, Thomas., “Gross-Deutschland in Europe: Planned or Unplanned Effects of the German Anschluss on Hegemonic Leadership in the European Community.” In William, Graf (ed.), The Internationalization of the German Political Economy: Evolution of a Hegemonic Project. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992.
38. Jessop, Bob., “Conservative Regimes and the Transition to Post-Fordism: The Cases of Great Britain and West Germany Compared.” In Manfred, Gottdiener, and Nicos, Komninos (eds.), Capitalist Development and Crisis Theory. New York: St Martin’s Press, 1987.
39. Jessop, Bob., State Theory: Putting Capitalist States in Their Place. Cambridge: Polity, 1990.
40. Jessop, Bob., “Post-Fordism and the State.” In Ash, Amin (ed.), Post Fordism: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994.
41. Kaplinsky, Raphael., Automation: New Technology and Society. Geneva: ILO, 1984.
42. Katzenstein, Peter., Small States in World Markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985.
43. Kratke, Michael., “Globalisierung und Standortskonkurrenz.” Leviathan, 25, no. 2 (1997).
44. Lankowski, Carl., “Modell Deutschland and the International Regionalization of the West German State in the 1970s.” In Andrei, Markovits (ed.), The Political Economy of West Germany: Modell Deutschland. New York, Praeger, 1982.
45. Leborgne, Danielle, and Lipietz, Alain. “New Technologies, New Modes of Regulation: Some Spatial Implications.” Environment and Planning D, 6 (1988).
46. Lipietz, Alain., “The Globalization of the General Crisis of Fordism.” In John, Holmes, and Colin, Leys (ed.) Frontyard/Backyard. Toronto: Between the Lines, 1987.
47. Lipietz, Alain., “The Debt Problem, European Integration and the New Phase of World Crisis.” New Left Review, 178 (1989).
48. Lipietz, Alain., “Social Europe: The Post-Maastricht challenge.” Review of International Political Economy, 3, no. 3 (1996).
49. Lutz, Susanne., “The Revival of the Nation State? Stock Exchange Regulation in an Era of Internationalized Financial Markets.” Discussion paper, Max Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, 1996.
50. Macpherson, C. B., The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.
51. Mahon, Rianne., “From Solidaristic Wages to Solidaristic Work: A Post Fordist Historic Compromise for Sweden?” Economic and Industrial Democracy, 15, no. 3 (1994).
52. Markovits, Andrei, ed. The Political Economy of West Germany: Modell Deutschland. New York: Praeger, 1982a.
53. Markovits, Andrei., “The Legacy of Liberalism and Collectivism in the Labor Movement: A Tense but Fruitful Compromise for Model Germany.” In Andrei, Markovits (ed.), The Political Economy of West Germany: Modell Deutschland. New York: Praeger, 1982b.
54. Mjøset, Lars., “Nordic Economic Policies in the 1970s and the 1980s.” International Organization, 41, no. 3 (1987).
55. Moravcsik, Andrew., “Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community.” International Organization, 45, no. 1 (1991).
56. Münchau, Wolfgang., “German Opposition Leader Urges Single Currency Delay.” Financial Times (October 30, 1995), p. 2.
57. Norman, Peter., “Waigel Spells Out Plan for EMU Stability.” Financial Times (November 8, 1995), p. 2.
58. Notermans, Ton., “The Abdication of Policy Autonomy: Why the Macroeconomic Policy Regime Has Become so Unfavourable to Labor.” Politics and Society, 21, no. 2 (1993).
59. Olsson, Sven E., “Sweden.” In Peter, Flora (ed.), Growth to Limits, vol 1. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1987.
60. Panitch, Leo., “Globalisation and the State.” In Ralph, Miliband, and Leo, Panitch (eds.), The Socialist Register 1994. London: Merlin Press, 1994.
61. Pontusson, Jonas., The Limits of Social Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1992.
62. Rajan, Raghuram., “The Bank Is Dead, Long Live the Bank!” Financial Times, Mastering Finance, 10 (1997).
63. Riemer, Jeremiah., “Alterations in the Design of Mode Germany: Critical Innovations in the Policy Machinery for Economic Steering.” In Andrei, Markovits (ed.), The Political Economy of West Germany: Modell Deutschland. New York: Praeger, 1982.
64. Ross, George., “Confronting the New Europe.” New Left Review, 191 (1992).
65. Ryner, Magnus., “Assessing SAP’s Economic Policy in the 1980s: The Third Way, the Swedish Model and the Transition from Fordism to Post-Fordism.” Economic and Industrial Democracy, 15, no. 3 (1994).
66. Ryner, Magnus., “Globalization and the Crisis of the Swedish Model.” Ph.D. dissertation, York University, Toronto, 1996.
67. Sandberg, Ake., “‘Volvoism’ at the End of the Road?” Studies in Political Economy, 45 (1994).
68. Sandberg, Ake, et al. Technological Change and Codetermination in Sweden. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1993.
69. Sandholz, Wayne., “Choosing Union: Monetary Politics and Maastricht.” International Organization, 47, no. 1 (1993).
70. Sandholz, Wayne, and Zysman, John. “1992: Recasing the European Bargain.” World Politics, 42, no. 1 (1989–90).
71. Schlupp, Frieder., “World Market Strategy and World Power Politics: German Europeanization and Globalization Projects in the 1990s.” In William, Graf (ed.), The Internationalization of the German Political Economy: Evolution of a Hegemonic Project. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1992.
72. Schmid, Josef., “Kontinuität und Wandel der CDU: Eine ‘halbe Wende’ durch politische Fragmentierung.” Mimeo, FG Politik and Verwaltungswissenschaft, Universität Konstanz, 1987.
73. Schmid, Josef., “Die Volksparteien unter Anpassungsdruck.” In Georg, Simonis (ed.), Das Modell Deutschland in der neuen Weltordnung. Opladen: Leske and Budrich, 1997.
74. Semmler, Willi., “Economic Aspects of Model Germany: A Comparison with the United States.” In Andrei, Markovits (ed.), The Political Economy of West Germany: Modell Deutschland. New York: Praeger, 1982.
75. Simonis, Georg, ed. Das Modell Deutschland in der neuen Weltordnung. Opladen: Leske and Budrich, 1997.
76. Standing, Guy., “New Technology and Employment: A Social Dividend Solution.” Mimeo. Geneva: ILO World Employment Programme, 1989.
77. Strange, Susan. Casino Capitalism, 2d ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.
78. Streeck, Wolfgang., “German Capitalism: Does It Exist? Can It Survive?” Discussion paper, Max Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, 1995.
79. Sweden Ministry of Finance. Finansplanen. Prop. 1983/84, 100 Bilaga 1 (1983–84).
80. Thelen, Kathleen., “West European Labor in Transition: Sweden and Germany Compared.” World Politics, 46, no. 1 (1993).
81. Van der Pijl, Kees. Transnational Classes and International Relations. London: Routledge, 1998.
82. Wacquant, Loic., “Vom wohltätigen Staat zum strafenden Staat: Über den politischen Umgang mit dem Elend in Amerika.” Leviathan, 1 (1997).
83. Ziebura, Gilbert., “Neue Herausforderungen für das Modell Deutschland.” In Georg, Simonis (ed.), Das Modell Deutschland in der neuen Weltordnung. Opladen: Leske and Budrich, 1997.
84. Zysman, John., Governments, Markets and Growth. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1983.