Modeling within-subject dependencies in ordinal paired comparison data

Psychometrika

Volumn 62, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 411-434

  Böckenholt, Ulf ^b   Dillon, William R ^a  

^a SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040163868     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02294559     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Agresti, A. (1992). Analysis of ordinal paired comparison data. Applied Statistics, 41, 287-297.
2. Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., & Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete multivariate analysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
3. Babington-Smith, B. (1950). Discussion of Professor Ross' paper. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 12, 153-162.
4. Bock, R. D., & Jones, L. V. (1968). The measurement and prediction of judgment and choice. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
5. Böckenholt, U. (1992). Thurstonian representation for partial ranking data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 31-49.
6. Böckenholt, I., & Gaul, W. (1986). Analysis of choice behavior via probabilistic ideal point and vector models. Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, 2, 209-226.
7. Bradley, R. A., & Terry, M. E. (1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39, 324-345.
8. Carroll, J. D., & DeSoete, G. (1991). Toward a new paradigm for the study of multiattribute choice behavior. American Psychologist, 46, 342-351.
9. Cook, W. D., & Kress, M. (1985). Ordinal ranking with intensity of preference. Management Science, 31, 26-32.
10. David, H. A., (1988). The method of paired comparisons. London: Griffin.
11. Davidson, R. R. (1970). On extending the Bradley-Terry model to accommodate ties in paired comparison experiments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 317-328.
12. DeSoete, G., & Winsberg, S. (1993). A Thurstonian pairwise choice model with univariate and multivariate spline transformations. Psychometrika, 58, 233-256.
13. Dillon, W. R., Kumar, A., & de Borrero, M. (1993). Capturing individual differences in paired comparisons: An extended BTL model incorporating descriptor variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 42-51.
14. Edwards, A. L. & Thurstone, L. L. (1952). An interval consistency check for the method of successive intervals and the method of graded dichotomies. Psychometrika, 17, 169-180.
15. Fienberg, S. E. & Larntz, K. (1976). Log-linear representation for paired and multiple comparisons models. Biometrika, 63, 245-254.
16. Formann, A. K. (1989). Constrained latent class models: Some further applications. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 37-54.
17. Formann, A. K. (1992). Linear logistic latent class analysis for polytomous data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 476-486.
18. Glenn, W. A., & David, H. A. (1960). Ties in paired comparison experiments using a modified Thurstone-Mosteller model. Biometrics, 16, 86-109.
19. Goodman, L. (1979). Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 537-552.
20. Haberman, S. (1988). A stabilized Newton-Raphson algorithm for log-linear models for frequency tables derived by indirect observations. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1988 (pp. 193-212). Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Halff, H. M. (1976). Choice theories for differentially comparable alternatives. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 14, 244-246.
22. Joe, H. (1988). Majorization, entropy and paired comparisons. Annals of Statistics, 16, 915-925.
23. Kendall, M. G. (1962). Ranks and measures. Biometrika, 49, 133-137.
24. Kendall, M. G. (1975). Rank correlation methods. London: Griffin.
25. Kroeger, K. (1992). Unpublished data set. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
26. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.
27. Mellers, B. A., & Biagini, K. (1994). Similarity and choice. Psychological Review, 101, 505-518.
28. Morrison, H. W. (1963). Testable conditions for triads of paired comparison choices. Psychometrika, 28, 369-390.
29. Park, C. W. (1978). A seven-point scale and a decision-maker's simplifying choice strategy: An operationalized satisficing-plus model. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 252-271.
30. Pendergrass, P. N., & Bradley, R. A. (1960). Ranking in triple comparison. In I. Olkin (Ed.), Contributions to probability and statistics (pp. 331-351), Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
31. Rumelhart, D. L., & Greeno, J. G. (1971). Similarity between stimuli: An experimental test of the Luce and Restle choice models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 8, 370-381.
32. Sjöberg, L. (1967). Successive categories scaling of paired comparisons. Psychometrika, 32, 297-308.
33. Stevens, S. S. (1986) Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
34. Takane, Y. (1980). Maximum likelihood estimation in the generalized cases of Thurstone's law of comparative judgment. Japanese Psychological Research, 22, 188-196.
35. Takane, Y. (1987). Analysis of covariance structures and probabilistic binary choice data. Cognition and Communication, 20, 45-62.
36. Takane, Y. & deLeeuw, J. (1987). On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables. Psychometrika, 52, 393-408.
37. Thurstone, L. L. (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273-286.
38. Torgerson, W. S. (1958) Theory and method of scaling, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
39. Tutz, G. (1986). Bradley-Terry-Luce models with an ordered response. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 30, 306-316.
40. Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preference. Psychological Review, 76, 31-48.
41. Vermunt, J. K. (1993). Lern: Log-linear and event history analysis with missing data using the EM algorithm. Unpublished manuscript, Tilburg University.
42. van Acker, P. (1990). Transitivity revisited. Annals of Operations Research, 23, 1-35.
43. Yakowitz, S. J., & Spragins (1968). On the identifiability of finite mixtures. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 39, 209-214.