Judgment and Response Processes across Two Knowledge Domains

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 222-257

  Bender, Randall H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040163791     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2792     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Agresti A. Categorical data analysis. 1990;Wiley, New York.
2. Albert J. M., Sponsler G. C. Subjective probability calibration: A mathematical model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 33:1989;298-308.
3. Ashby F. G., Gott R. E. Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition. 14:1988;33-53.
4. Bacon F. T. Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. 5:1979;241-252.
5. Begg I., Armour V. Repetition and the ring of truth: Biasing comments. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science. 23:1991;195-213.
6. Björkman M. Internal cue theory: Calibration and resolution of confidence in general knowledge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 58:1994;386-405.
7. Budescu D. V., Erev I., Wallsten T. S., Au W. T. On the importance of random error in the study of probability judgment: Part II: Applying the stochastic judgment model to detect systematic trends. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 10:1997;173-188.
8. Cressie N., Read T. R. C. Multinomial goodness-of-fit tests. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 46:1984;440-464.
9. Ferrell W. R. Calibration of sensory and cognitive judgments: A single model for both. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 35:1994a;297-314.
10. Ferrell W. R. Discrete subjective probabilities and decision analysis. Subjective probability. 1994b;Wiley, New York. p. 411-451.
11. Ferrell W. R. A model for realism of confidence judgments: implications for underconfidence in sensory discrimination. Perception & Psychophysics. 57:1995;246-254.
12. Ferrell W. R., McGoey P. J. A model of calibration for subjective probabilities. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance. 26:1980;32-53.
13. Gigerenzer G., Hoffrage U., Kleinbölting H. Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review. 98:1991;506-528.
14. Griffin D., Tversky A. The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psychology. 24:1992;411-435.
15. Hasher L., Goldstein D., Topino T. Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 16:1977;107-112.
16. Heath C., Tversky A. Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 4:1991;5-28.
17. Juslin P. An explanation of the hard-easy effect in studies of realism of confidence in one's general knowledge. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 5:1993;55-71.
18. Juslin P. The overconfidence phenomenon as a consequence of informal experimenter-guided selection of Almanac items. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 57:1994;226-246.
19. Keren G. Facing uncertainty in the game of bridge: A calibration study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 39:1987;98-114.
20. Keren G. Calibration and probability judgments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Acta Psychologica. 77:1991;217-273.
21. Koehler K. Goodness-of-fit tests for log-linear models in sparse contingency tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 75:1986;336-344.
22. Koehler K., Larntz K. An empirical investigation of goodness-of-fit statistics for sparse multinomials. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 81:1980;483-493.
23. Koriat A. How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review. 100:1993;609-639.
24. Koriat A., Lichtenstein S., Fischhoff B. Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. 6:1980;107-118.
25. Lichtenstein S., Fischhoff B., Phillips L. D. Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. 1982;306-334 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
26. May R. S. Inferences, subjective probability and frequency of correct answers: A cognitive approach to the overconfidence phenomenon. Brehmer B., Jungermann H., Lourens P, Sevo'n G. New directions in research on decision making. 1986a.
27. May R. S. Overconfidence as a result of incomplete and wrong knowledge. Sholtz R. W. Current issues in west german decision research. 1986b;Lang, Frankfurt.
28. McClelland A. G. R., Bolger F. The calibration of subjective probabilities: Theories and models 1980-94. Wright G., Ayton P. Subjective probability. 1994;411-451 Wiley, New York.
29. Nelson T. O., Narens L. Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. Bower G. The psychology of learning and motivation, advances in research and theory. 26:1990;125-173 Academic Press, San Diego.
30. Pitz G. F. Subjective probability distributions for imperfectly known quantities. Gregg L. W. Knowledge and cognition. 1974;Wiley, New York.
31. Read T. R. C, Cressie N. Goodness-of-fit statistics for discrete multivariate data. 1988;Springer-Verlag, New York.
32. Shanteau J. Competence in experts: The role of task characteristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 53:1992;252-266.
33. Shanteau J, Stewart T. R. Why study expert decision making? Some historical perspectives and comments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 53:1992;95-106.
34. Smith G. F., Benson P. G., Curley S. P. Belief, knowledge, and uncertainty: A cognitive perspective on subjective probability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 48:1991;291-321.
35. Smith M., Ferrell W. R. The effect of base rate on calibration of subjective probability for true-false questions: Model and experiment. Humphreys P., Svenson O., Vari A. Analyzing and aiding decisions. 1983;469-488.
36. Treisman M. Effects of the setting and adjustment of decision criteria on psychophysical performance. Roskam E. E., Suck R. Progress in mathematical psychology - 1. 1987;253-297 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. North-Holland.
37. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science. 185:1974;1124-1131.
38. Wallsten, T. S. 1991, A stochastic model of judgment in statement verification tasks.
39. Wallsten, T. S. Ariely, D. Bender, R. H. 1995, November, New results on statement verification: model 1, data 0.
40. Wallsten, T. S. Ariely, D. Bender, R. H. Trembath, D. 1998, New results on statement verification: model 1, data 0.
41. Wallsten, T. S. Bender, R. H. Li, Y.-L. 1998, Separating judgment from response processes in statement verification.
42. Wallsten T. S., Budescu D. V., Zwick R. Comparing the calibration and coherence of numerical and verbal probabilistic judgments. Management Science. 39:1993;176-190.
43. Wallsten T. S., González-Vallejo C. Statement verification: A stochastic model of judgment and response. Psychological Review. 101:1994;490-504.