The German and Norwegian correspondences to the English construction type that's what

Linguistics

Volumn 39, Issue 373, 2001, Pages 583-605

  Johansson, Stig ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040160677     PISSN: 00243949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/ling.2001.024     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Achard, Michel (1999). The French demonstrative ça and the cognitive dynamics of discourse. Paper given at the Sixth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Stockholm, 10-16 July.
2. Ahlemeyer, Birgit; and Kohlhof, Inga (1999). Bridging the cleft. An analysis of the translation of English it-clefts into German. Languages in Contrast 2(1), 1-25.
3. Andersson, Sven-Gunnar (1993). Zu Satzspaltung (Cleft) und Langer Extraktion in Germanischen Sprachen. In Wordstellung und Informationsstruktur, Marga Reis (ed.), 39-61. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
4. Baker, Mona (1993). Corpus linguistics and translation studies: implications and applications. In Text and Technology. In Honour of John Sinclair, Mona Baker et al. (eds.), 233-250. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
5. Biber, Douglas; Johansson, Stig; Leech, Geoffrey; Conrad, Susan; and Finegan, Edward (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
6. Collins, Peter (1991). Cleft and Pseudo-Cleft Constructions in English. London and New York: Routledge.
7. Ebeling, Jarle (1998). The Translation Corpus Explorer: a browser for parallel texts. In Corpora and Cross-Linguistic Research: Theory, Method, and Case Studies, Stig Johansson and Signe Oksefjell (eds.), 101-112. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.
8. Faarlund, Jan Terje; Lie, Svein; and Vannebo, Kjell Ivar (1997). Norsk referansegrammatikk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
9. Gellerstam, Martin (1996). Translations as a source for cross-linguistic studies. In Languages in Contrast, Karin Aijmer et al. (eds.), 53-62. Lund Studies in English 88. Lund: Lund University Press.
10. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994 [1985]). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Arnold.
11. _; and Hasan, Ruqaiya (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
12. Hofland, Knut; and Johansson, Stig (1998). The Translation Corpus Aligner: a program for automatic alignment of parallel texts. In Corpora and Cross-Linguistic Research: Theory, Method, and Case Studies, Stig Johansson and Signe Oksefjell (eds.), 87-100. Amsterdam and Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.
13. Johansson, Mats (1996). Contrastive data as a resource in the study of English clefts. In Languages in Contrast, Karin Aijmer et al. (eds.), 127-150. Lund Studies in English 88. Lund: Lund University Press.
14. Kirkwood, Henry W. (1969). Aspects of word order and its communicative function in English and German. Journal of Linguistics 5, 85-107.
15. _(1970). Some systematic means of functional sentence perspective in English and German. International Review of Applied Linguistics 8, 103-114.
16. Oberlander, Jon; and Delin, Judy (1996). The function and interpretation of reverse wh-clefts in spoken discourse. Language and Speech 39, 185-227.
17. Prince, Ellen F. (1978). A comparison of WH-clefts and ir-clefts in discourse. Language 54, 883-906.
18. Schmid, Monika S. (1999). Translating the Elusive. Marked Word Order and Subjectivity in English-German Translation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.