Revisiting the question: What difference does reading recovery make to an age cohort?

Educational Researcher

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 1996, Pages 26-28

  Hiebert, Elfrieda H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040146101     PISSN: 0013189X     EISSN: 1935102X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X025007026     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Anderson, RC, EH Hiebert, JA Scott, and IAG Wilkinson (1985). Becoming a nation of readers. Urbana-Champaign, IL: Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
2. Center, Y, K Wheldall, L Freeman, L Outhred, and M McNaught (1995). An evaluation of Reading Recovery. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 240-263.
3. Commonwealth of Virginia (1994). Reading Recovery program as a statewide prevention effort. Richmond, VA: VA Department of Education. House Document No. 20.
4. DeFord, DE, GS Pinnell, C Lyons, and AW Place (1990). The Reading Recovery follow-up study: Vol. 11. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
5. Dyer, P (1992). Reading Recovery: A cost-effectiveness and educational-outcomes analysis. ERS Spectrum, 10, 10-19.
6. Hiebert, EH (1994). Reading Recovery in the United States: What difference does it make to an age cohort? Educational Researcher, 23(9), 15-25.
7. Lyons, CA, GS Pinnell, and DE DeFord (1993). Partners in learning: Teachers and children in Reading Recovery. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Pinnell, GS (1990). Success for low achievers through Reading Recovery. Educational Leadership, 48, 17-21.
9. Pinnell, GS, DE DeFord, CA Lyons, and A Bryk (1995). Response to Rasinski. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 272-275.
10. Pinnell, GS, C Lyons, and N Jones (1996). Response to Hiebert: What difference does Reading Recovery make? Educational Researcher, 25(7), 23-25.
11. Rasinski, TV (1995a). Commentary: On the effects of Reading Recovery: A response to Pinnell, Lyons, DeFord, Bryk, and Seltzer. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 264-270.
12. Rasinski, TV (1995b). Reply to Pinnell, DeFord, Lyons, and Bryk. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 276-277.
13. Shanahan, T, and R Barr (1995). Reading Recovery: An independent evaluation of the effects of an early instructional intervention for at-risk learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 958-996.
14. Shook, R, and J Hailey (December, 1991). Reading Recovery, Paper presented at a conference on Early Reading Interventions sponsored by the Elementary Education Office of the California Department of Education, Los Angeles.