T-10. Effect of inversion on perceptual biases for chimeric faces

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 105-108

  Luh, Karen E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040116603     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Bruce, V., Burton, A. M., Hanna, E., Healey, P., Mason, O., Coombes, A., Fright, R., & Linney, A. 1993. Sex discrimination: how do we tell the difference between male and female faces? Perception, 22, 131-152.
2. Christman, S., & Hackworth, M. 1993. Equivalent perceptual asymmetries for free viewing of positive and negative emotional expressions in chimeric faces. Neuropsychologia, 31(6), 621-4.
3. Farah, M., Tanaka, J., & Drain, H. 1995. What causes the face inversion effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 628-634.
4. Gilbert, C., & Bakan, P. 1973. Visual asymmetry in the perception of faces. Neuropsychologia, 11, 355-362.
5. Levine, S. C., Banich, M. T., & Koch-Weser, M. 1988. Face recognition: A general of specific right hemisphere capacity? Brain and Cognition, 8, 303-325.
6. Levy, J., Heller, W., Banich, M. T., & Burton, L. A. 1983. Asymmetry of perception in free viewing of chimeric faces. Brain and Cognition, 2, 404-419.
7. Luh, K. E., Rueckert, L. M., & Levy, J. 1991. Perceptual asymmetries for free viewing of several types of chimeric stimuli. Brain and Cognition, 16, 83-103.
8. Yin, R. K. 1969. Looking at upside down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.