Evaluation of the effects of a head-mounted display on ocular accommodation

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 278-289

  Neveu, Charles ^a   Blackmon, Ted ^b   Stark, Lawrence ^b  

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040096239     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/105474698565712     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Badal (1876). Ann oculist, 75, 5-13.
2. Brown, N. (1974). The change in lens curvature with age. Experimental Eye Research, 19, 175-183.
3. Campbell, F. W. (1954). Accommodation reflex. Brit. Orthoptic Journal, 11(13).
4. Campbell, F. W., & Westeimer, G. (1959). Factors influencing accommodation responses of the human eye. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 49, 568-571.
5. Ebenholtz, S. M. (1991). Effects of teleoperator-system displays on human oculomotor systems. In 21st International Conference on Environmental Systems, San Francisco, CA.
6. Heath, G. G. (1956). Components of accommodation. American Journal of Optometry and Archives of the American Academy of Optometry, 33(11), 569-579.
7. Hiruma, N., & Fukuda, T. (1993). Accommodation response to binocular stereoscopic TV images and their viewing conditions. SMPTE Journal.
8. Koretz, J. F., Handelman, G. H., & Brown, N. P. (1984). Analysis of human crystalline lens curvature as a function of accommodative state and age. Vision Research, 24(10), 1141-1151.
9. Liu, A., Tharp, G., French, L., Lai, S., & Stark, L. (1993). Some of what one needs to know about using head-mounted displays to improve teleoperator performance. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 9:5, 638-648.
10. Mon-Williams, M., Wann, J. P., & Rushton, S. (1993). Binocular vision in a virtual world: visual deficits following the wearing of a head-mounted display. Ophthalmology and Physiological Optics, 13, 387-391.
11. Novak, J. M. (1992). Nonlinearfit.m. Mathematica package.
12. Press, W. H., Flannery, B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., & Vetterling, W. T. (1988). Nonlinear Models. In Numerical Recipes in C (pp. 542-547). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
13. Rashbass, C., & Westheimer, G. (1961). Disjunctive eye movements. Journal of Physiology, 159, (339).
14. Robinett, W., & Rolland, J. (1992). A computational model for the stereoscopic optics of a head-mounted display system. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1, 45-59.
15. Rushton, S., Mon-Williams, M., & Wann, J. P. (1994). Binocular vision in a bi-ocular world: new-generation head-mounted displays avoid causing visual deficit. Displays, 0(0), 1-6.
16. Shirachi, D., Liu, J., Lee, M., Jang, J., Wong, J., & Stark, L. (1978). Accommodation dynamics: 1. Range nonlineariry. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 55, 631-641.
17. Stark, L. (1984). Visual fatigue and the VDT workplace. In J. Bennett, D. Case, J. Sandelin, & M. Smith (Eds.), Visual Display Terminals: Usability Issues and Health Concerns (pp. 229-269). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
18. Stark, L. (1987). Presbyopia in light of accommodation. In L. Stark & G. Obrecht (Eds.), Presbyopia/Recent Research and Reviews from the 3rd International Symposium (pp. 264-274). Professional Press Books, Fairchild Pubs.
19. F. Sun & L. Stark (1986). Dynamics of accommodation: Measurements for clinical application. Experimental Neurology, 91, 71-79.
20. Sun, F., Stark, L., Nguyen, A., Wong, J., Lakshminarayanan, V., & Mueller, E. (1988). Changes in accommodation with age: Static and dynamic. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics, 65, 492-498.
21. Whiteside, T. C. D. (1957). The Problems of Vision in Flight at High Altitude. Pergamon Press.