Comments on an evaluation of the 1992 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant

Nuclear Engineering and Design

Volumn 168, Issue 1-3, 1997, Pages 339-360

  Helton, J C ^a,b   Trauth, K M ^a  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040095484     PISSN: 00295493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-5493(96)01359-3     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. D.R. Anderson, J.C. Helton, H.-N. Jow and M.G. Marietta, Performance assessment for the waste isolation pilot plant, in C. Cacciabue and I.A. Papazoglou, Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management '96: ESREL '96-PSAM 111, Vol. 2, Springer, Berlin, 1996, 788-794.
2. G. Apostolakis, The concept of probability in safety assessments of technological systems, Science, 250 (1990) 1359-1364.
3. S.G. Bertram-Howery, M.G. Marietta, R.P. Rechard, P.N. Swift, D.R. Anderson, B.L. Baker, J.E. Bean, Jr., W. Beyeler, K.F. Brinster, R.V. Guzowski, J.C. Helton, R.D. McCurley, D.K. Rudeen, J.D. Schreiber and P. Vaughn, Preliminary Comparison with 40 CFR Part 191, Subpart B for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, December 1990, SAND90-2347. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1990.
4. R.V. Bynum, C. Stockman, Y. Wang, A. Peterson, J. Krumhansl, J. Nowak and M.S.Y. Chu, Implementation of chemical controls through a backfill system for the waste isolation pilot plant (WIPP), submitted to ICEM'97, The Sixth International Conference on Radioactive Waste Management and Environment Remediation, Oct. 12-16, 1997, Singapore.
5. W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. II, Wiley, NY, 2nd edn., 1971.
6. A.R. Felmy and J.H. Weare, The prediction of borate mineral equilibrium in natural waters: application to Searles Lake, California, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 50 (1986) 2771-2783.
7. A.R. Felmy, D. Rai, J.A. Schramke and J.L. Ryan, The solubility of plutonium hydroxide in dilute solution and in high-tonic strength chloride brines, Radiochim. Acta, 48 (1989) 29-35.
8. 2O, Radiochim. Acta, 50 (1990) 193-240.
9. A.R. Felmy, D. Rai and M.J. Mason, The solubility of hydrous thorium (IV) oxide in chloride media: development of an aqueous ion-interaction model, Radiochim. Acta, 55 (1991) 177-185.
10. 2O to high concentration. J. Solution Chem., 21 (1992) 407-423.
11. J. Fuger and F.L. Oetting, The Chemical Thermodynamics of Actinide Elements and Compounds, Part 2, The Actinide Aqueous Ions, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1976.
12. J. Fuger, L.L. Khodakovsky, E.I. Sergeyeva, V.A. Medvedev and J.D. Navratil, The Chemical Thermodynamics of Actinide Elements and Compounds, Part 12, The Actinide Aqueous Inorganic Complexes, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1992.
13. R.V. Guzowski, Preliminary Identification of Scenarios That May Affect the Escape and Transport of Radionuclides from the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, Southeastern New Mexico, SAND89-7149, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1990.
14. I. Hacking, The Emergence of Probability, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1975.
15. 2O system to high ionic concentration at 25°C, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 44 (1980) 981-997.
16. 2O system to high ionic strength at 25°C, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 48 (1984) 723-751.
17. C.E. Harvie, J.P. Greenberg and J.H. Weare, A chemical equilibrium algorithm for highly non-ideal multiphase systems: free energy minimization, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 51 (1987) 1045-1057.
18. J.C. Helton, Risk, uncertainty in risk, and the EPA release limits for radioactive waste disposal, Nucl. Technol., 101 (1993a) 18-39.
19. J.C. Helton, Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 42 (1993b) 327-367.
20. J.C. Helton, Drilling intrusion probabilities for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 40 (1993c) 259-275.
21. J.C. Helton, J.W. Garner, M.G. Marietta, R.P. Rechard, D.K. Rudeen and P.N. Swift, Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results obtained in a preliminary performance assessment for the waste isolation pilot plant, Nucl. Sci. Eng., 114 (1993d) 286-331.
22. J.C. Helton and H.J. Iuzzolino, Construction of complementary cumulative distribution functions for comparison with the EPA release limits for radioactive waste disposal, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 40 (1993e) 277-293.
23. J.C. Helton, D.R. Anderson, B.L. Baker, J.E. Bean, J.W. Berglund, W. Beyeler, J.W. Garner, H.J. Iuzzolino, M.G. Marietta, R.P. Rechard, P.J. Roache, D.K. Rudeen, J.D. Schreiber, P.N. Swift, M.S. Tierney and P. Vaughn, Effect of alternative conceptual models in a preliminary performance assessment for the waste isolation pilot plant. Nucl. Eng. Des., 154 (1995) 251-344.
24. J.C. Helton, Probability, conditional probability and complementary cumulative distribution functions in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., (1996a) 145-163.
25. J.C. Helton, D.R. Anderson, B.L. Baker, J.E. Bean, J.W. Berglund, W. Beyeler, K. Economy, J.W. Garner, S.C. Hora, H.J. Iuzzolino, P. Knupp, M.G. Marietta, J. Rath, R.P. Rechard, P.J. Roache, D.K. Rudeen, K. Salari, J.D. Schreiber, P.N. Swift, M.S. Tierney and P. Vaughn, Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results obtained in the 1992 performance assessment for the waste isolation pilot plant, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 51 (1996b) 53-100.
26. J.C. Helton and A.W. Shiver, A Monte Carlo procedure for the construction of complementary cumulative distribution functions for compariosn with the EPA release limits for radioactive waste disposal, Risk Anal., 16 (1996c) 43-55.
27. D.E. Hobart, C.J. Bruton, F.J. Millero, I-M. Chou, K.M. Trauth and D.R. Anderson, Estimates of the Solubilities of Waste Element Radionuclides in Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Brines: A Report by the Expert Panel on the Source Term, SAND96-0098, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1996.
28. F.O. Hoffman and J.S. Hammonds, Propagation of uncertainty in risk assessments: the need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability, Risk Anal., 14 (1994) 707-712.
29. S.C. Hora, D. von Winterfeldt and K.M. Trauth, Expert Judgment on Inadvertent Human Intrusion into the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, SAND90-3063, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1991.
30. S.C. Hora, Appendix A: probabilities of human intrusion into the WIPP: methodology for the 1992 preliminary comparison, Preliminary Performance Assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, December 1992, Vol. 3, Model Parameters, Sandia WIPP Project, SAND92-0700/3, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, A-69-A99.
31. S.C. Hora, personal communication, 1996.
32. IAEA, Evaluating the Reliability of Predictions Made Using Environmental Transfer Models, Safety Series Rep. 100, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1989.
33. S. Kaplan and B.J. Garrick, On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Anal., 1 (1981) 11-27.
34. W.W.-L. Lee, A critical evaluation of the 1992 performance assessment for the waste isolation pilot plant, Nucl. Eng. Des., 168 (1997) 325.
35. C. Lierse, W. Treiber and J.I. Kim, Hydrolysis reactions of neptunium (V), Radiochim. Acta, 38 (1985) 27-28.
36. M.G. Marietta, S.G. Bertram-Howery, D.R. Anderson, K.F. Brinster, R.V. Guzowski, H. Iuzzolino and R.P. Rechard, Performance Assessment Methodology Demonstration: Methodology Development for Evaluating Compliance with EPA 40 CFR 191, Subpart B, for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, SAND89-2027, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1989.
37. 4 at 25°C, Inorg. Chem., 22 (1983) 2093-2095.
38. M.D. McKay, R.J. Beckman and W.J. Conover, A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics, 21 (1979) 239-245.
39. National Research Council, Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1983.
40. National Research Council, Issues in Risk Assessment, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1993.
41. National Research Council, Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1994.
42. V. Neck, J.I. Kim and B. Kanellakopulos, Solubility and hydrolysis behaviour of neptunium (V), Radiochim. Acta, 56 (1992) 25-30.
43. V. Neck, W. Runde, J.I. Kim and B. Kanellakopulos, Solid liquid equilibrium reactions of neptunium (V) in carbonate solutions at different ionic strength, Radiochim. Acta, 65 (1994) 29-37.
44. H. Nitsche, Basic research for assessment of geologic nuclear waste repositories: what solubility and speciation studies of transuranium elements can tell us, T.A. Abrajano, Jr. and L.H. Johnson (eds.), Materials Research Society Symp. Proc., Boston, MA, November 26-29, 1990, in Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 212 (1991) 517-529.
45. H. Nitsche, K. Roberts, R.C. Gatti, T. Prussin, K. Becraft, S.C. Leung, S.A. Carpenter and C.F. Novak, Plutonium Solubility and Speciation Studies in a Simulant of Air Intake Shaft Water from the Culebra Dolomite at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, SAND92-0659. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1992.
46. H. Nitsche, K. Roberts, R. Xi, T. Prussin, K. Becraft, I. Al Mahamid, H.B. Silber, S.A. Carpenter, R.C. Gatti and C.F. Novak, Long term plutonium solubility and speciation studies in a synthetic brine, Chemistry and Migration Behavior of Actinides and Fission Products in the Geosphere, Proc. 4th Int. Conf., Charleston, SC, December 12-17, 1993, in Radiochim. Acta, 66-67 (1994) 38.
47. C.F. Novak, The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) Actinide Source Term: Test Plan for the Conceptual Model and the Dissolved Concentration Submodel, SAND95-1895, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1995.
48. H.W. Papenguth and Y.K. Behl, Test Plan for Evaluation of Dissolved Actinide Retardation at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, TP 96-02, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1996.
49. G.W. Parry, On the meaning of probability in probabilistic safety assessment, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 23 (1988) 309-314.
50. M.E. Paté-Cornell, Probability and uncertainty in nuclear safety decisions, Nucl. Eng. Des., 93 (1986) 319-327.
51. K.S. Pitzer and G.F. Mayorga, Thermodynamics of electrolytes. II. Activity and osmotic coefficients for strong electrolytes with one or both ions univalent, J. Phys. Chem., 77 (1973) 2300-2308.
52. K.S. Pitzer and L.F. Silvester, Thermodynamics of electrolytes. II. Properties of 3:2, 4:2 and other high-valence types, J. Phys. Chem., 82 (1978) 1239-1242.
53. K.S. Pitzer, Activity coefficients in electrolyte solutions, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1991.
54. Public Law 102-579, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Land Withdrawal Act, 1992.
55. 2O(am), Inorg. Chem., 29 (1990) 260-264.
56. D.T. Reed and R.C. Moore, Comparison of WIPP dissolved actinide model with empirical results in complex brines, Sandia National Laboratories Tech. Rep., in preparation.
57. 2O for 5-55°C, J. Phys. Chem., 96 (1992) 11065-11072.
58. T. Sewards, Characterization of Fracture Surfaces in Dolomite Rock, Culebra Dolomite Member, Rustler Formation, SAND90-7019, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1991a.
59. T. Sewards, M.L. Williams, K. Keil, S.J. Lambert and C.L. Stein, Mineralogy of the Culebra Dolomite, M.D. Siegel, S.J. Lambert and K.L. Robinson (eds.), Hydrogeochemical Studies of the Rustler Formation and Related Rocks in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Area, Southeastern New Mexico, SAND88-0196, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, (1991b) 3-1-3-43.
60. T. Sewards, A. Brearley, R. Glenn, I.D.R. MacKinnon and M.D. Siegel, Nature and Genesis of Clay Minerals of the Rustler Formation in the Vicinity of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in Southeastern New Mexico, SAND90-2569, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1992.
61. M.D. Siegel, S.J. Lambert and K.L. Robinson, Hydrogeochemical Studies of the Rustler Formation and Related Rocks in the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Area, Southeastern New mexico, SAND88-0196, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1991.
62. K.M. Trauth, S.C. Hora, R.P. Rechard and D.R. Anderson, The Use of Expert Judgment to Quantify Uncertainty in Solubility and Sorption Parameters for Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Performance Assessment, SAND92-0479, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1992.
63. K.M. Trauth, S.C. Hora and R.V. Guzowski, Expert Judgment on markers to Deter Inadvertent Human Intrusion into the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, SAND92-1382, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1993.
64. US DOE, Final Environmental Impact Statement: Waste isolation Pilot Plant, DOE/EIS-0026, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, 1980.
65. US DOE, Final Supplement: Environmental Impact Statement, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, DOE/EIS-0026-FS, US Department of Energy, Office of Environmental Restoration and Waste Management, Washington DC, 1990.
66. US DOE, Strategy for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Test Phase, DOE/EM/48063-2, US Department of Energy, Office of Waste Operations, Washington DC, 1991.
67. US DOE, Draft Title 40 CFR 191 Compliance Certification Application for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, DRAFT-DOE/CAO-2056, US Department of Energy, Carlsbad Area Office, Carlsbad, NM, 1995.
68. US EPA, Technical Support of Standards for High-Level Radioactive Waste management. Volume C. Migration Pathways, EPA 520/4-79-007C, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiation Programs, Washington, DC, 1979.
69. US EPA, Technical Support of Standards for High-level Radioactive Waste Management, Vol. D, Release Mechanisms, EPA 520/4-79-007D, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiation Programs, Washington DC, 1980.
70. US EPA, Population Risks from Disposal of High-level Radioactive Wastes in Geologic Repositories, EPA 520/3-80-006, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiation Programs, Washington DC, 1982.
71. US EPA, Environmental standards for the management and disposal of spent nuclear fuel, high-level and transuranic radioactive wastes; final rule, 40 CFR part 191, Fed. Regist., 50 (1985) 38066-38089.
72. US EPA, Environmental radiation protection standards for the management and disposal of spent nuclear fuel, high-level and transuranic radioactive wastes; final rule, 40 CFR Part 191, Fed. Regist. 58 (1993a) 66398-66416.
73. US EPA, An SAB Report: Multi-Media Risk Assessment for Radon, Review of Uncertainty Analysis of Risks Associated with Exposure to Radon, EPA-SAB-RAC-93-014. US Environmental Protection Agency, Science Advisory Board, Washington DC, 1993b.
74. US EPA, 40 CFR Part 194: criteria for the certification and re-certification of the waste isolation pilot plant's compliance with the 40 CFR Part 191 disposal regulations; final rule, Fed. Regist., 61 (1996) 5224-5245.
75. US NRC, Safety goals for the operation of nuclear power plants: policy statement; correction and republication, Fed. Regist., 51 (1986) 30028-30033.
76. W.E. Vesley and D.M. Rasmuson, Uncertainties in nuclear probabilistic risk analyses, Risk Anal., 4 (1984) 313-322.
77. C.G. Whipple, Dealing with uncertainty about risk in risk management, in Hazards: Technology and Fairness, National Academy Press, Washington DC, 1986, pp. 44-60.
78. WIPP PA Division, preliminary Comparison with 40 CFR Part 191, Subpart B for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, December 1991, Vol. 1-4, SAND91-0893/1-4, Sandia National laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1991-1992.
79. WIPP PA Department, Preliminary Performance Assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, December, 1992, Vol. 1-5, SAND92-0700/1-5, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 1992-1993.
80. T.J. Wolery, Calculation of Chemical Equilibrium Between Aqueous Solutions and Minerals: The EQ3/6 Software Package, UCRL-52658, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 1979.
81. T.J. Wolery EQ3/6, A Software Package for Geochemical Modeling of Aqueous Systems - Package Overview and Installation Guide (Version 7.0), UCRL-MA-110662-Pt. 1, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 1992.