The mysterious disappearance of word processing

Computers and Composition

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 347-371

  Susser, Bernard ^a  

^a DOSHISHA WOMEN'S COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS   (Japan)

Author keywords

Computers and efficiency; Computers and writing; Disappearance; EFL; Heuristic device; Word processing

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040088364     PISSN: 87554615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s8755-4615(98)90006-8     Document Type: Article

References (168)

1. Al-Hazmi Sultan, Scholfield Phil. Word-processing compositions: An Arab ESL perspective. Archibald Alasdair, Jeffery Gaynor C. Second language acquisition and writing: A multi-disciplinary approach. 1997;110-124 University of Southampton, Southampton, England.
2. Balestri Diane Pelkus. Softcopy and hard: Word-processing and writing process. Academic Computing. 2:1988;14-17.
3. Balestri Diane Pelkus. Softcopy and hard: Word-processing and writing process. Academic Computing. 2:1988;41-45.
4. Benesch Sarah. Word processing in English as a second language: A case study of three non-native college students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication. Atlanta, GA :1987, March;. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 281 383).
5. Betts Mitch. Drop that mouse! The boss is coming! Computerworld. 1995, January 23;. [August 8, 1997] 〈http://www.antigame.com/news/boss.htm〉
6. Bernhardt Stephen A., Edwards Penny, Wojahn Patti. Teaching college composition with computers: A program evaluation study. Written Communication. 6:(1):1989;108-133.
7. Birkerts Sven. The Gutenberg elegies: The fate of reading in an electronic age. 1994;Fawcett Columbine, New York.
8. Boiarsky Carolyn. Fluency, fluidity, and word processing. Journal of Advanced Composition. 11:(1):1991;123-133.
9. Bowers C.A. The cultural dimensions of educational computing: Understanding the non-neutrality of technology. 1988;Teachers College Press, New York.
10. Breese Chris, Jackson Anita, Prince Terry. Promise in impermanence: Children writing with unlimited access to word processors. Early Child Development and Care. 118:1996;67-91.
11. Bridwell Lillian, Sirc Geoffrey, Brooke Robert. Revising and computing: Case studies of student writers. Freedman Sarah Warshauer. The acquisition of written language: Response and revision. 1985;172-194 Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
12. Bridwell-Bowles Lillian. Designing research on computer-assisted writing. Computers and Composition. 7:(1):1989;79-91.
13. Bridwell-Bowles Lillian, Johnson Parker, Brehe Steven. Composing and computers: Case studies of experienced writers. Matsuhashi Ann. Writing in real time: Modeling production processes. 1987;81-107 Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
14. Brown Jane Lightcap. Teaching word processing: A cooperative effort. The Writing Center Journal. 6:(2):1986;11-17.
15. Bruce Bertram C., Hogan Maureen P. The disappearance of technology: Toward an ecological model of literacy. Reinking David, McKenna Michael C., Labbo Linda D., Kieffer Ronald D. Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world. 1998;269-281 Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
16. Burley Hansel. Postsecondary novice and better than novice writers; Effects of word processing and a very special computer assisted writing lab. Paper presented at a conference of the Southwestern Educational Research Association. San Antonio, TX :1994, January;. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 373 857).
17. Carroll John M. The Nurnberg Funnel: Designing minimalist instruction for practical computer skill. 1990;MIT, Cambridge, MA.
18. Catano James V. Computer-based writing: Navigating the fluid text. College Composition and Communication. 36:(3):1985;309-316.
19. Chandler Daniel. Are we ready for word processors? English in Australia. 79:1987;11-17.
20. Chandler Daniel. The act of writing: A media theory approach. 1995;University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed, Wales, UK.
21. Chapelle Carol. The discourse of computer-assisted language learning: Toward a context for descriptive research. TESOL Quarterly. 24:(2):1990;199-225.
22. Cochran-Smith Marilyn, Paris Cynthia L., Kahn Jessica L. Learning to write differently: Beginning writers and word processing. 1991;Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
23. Cohen Moshe, Riel Margaret. The effect of distant audiences on students' writing. American Educational Research Journal. 26:(2):1989;143-159.
24. Colford Ian A. Writing in the electronic environment: Electronic text and the future of creativity and knowledge. Occasional paper 59. 1996;Dalhousie University School of Library and Information Studies, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
25. Collier Richard, Werier Clifford. When computer writers compose by hand. Computers and Composition. 12:(1):1994;47-59.
26. Conway Glenda. "What are we doing today?" High school basic writers collaborating in a computer lab. Computers and Composition. 12:(1):1994;79-95.
27. Crafton Robert E. Promises, promises: Computer-assisted revision and basic writers. Computers and Composition. 13:(3):1996;317-326.
28. Crew Louie. Software that puts the computer into composition. The ACE Newsletter. 5:(1):1989;4-5.
29. Cross Geoffrey. Left to their own devices: Three basic writers using word processing. Computers and Composition. 7:(2):1990;47-58.
30. Dalton Bridget M., Morocco Catherine Cobb, Neale Amy E. "I've lost my story!" Integrating word processing with writing instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA :1988, April;. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 296 717).
31. Dalton David W., Hannafin Michael J. The effects of word processing on written composition. Journal of Educational Research. 80:(6):1987;338-342.
32. Davidson Catherine. Taking advantage of technology: Using word processing to teach writing to students of English as a second language. Rijlaarsdam Gert, van den Bergh Huub, Couzijn Michel. Effective teaching and learning of writing: Current trends in research. 1996;89-100 Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
33. Davidson Catherine, Tomic Alice. Removing computer phobia from the writing classroom. English Language Teaching Journal. 48:(3):1994;205-213.
34. Dierckins Tony. Macintosh versus IBM in composition instruction: Does a significant difference exist? Computers and Composition. 11:(2):1994;151-164.
35. Dorner Jane. Computers and writing IV: Fourth annual conference on computers and the writing process [Conference report]. Computers & Writing Newsletter. 6:1991;14-15.
36. Dowling Carolyn. Word processing and the ongoing difficulty of writing. Computers and Composition. 11:(3):1994;227-235.
37. DUET 1.3 [Computer software]. Tokushima Prefecture. 1990;Just System, Japan.
38. Elbow Peter. Speaking and writing. Enos Theresa. Encyclopedia of rhetoric and composition: Communication from ancient times to the information age. 1996;686-690 Garland, New York.
39. Ellul Jacques. The technological society. 1964;Vintage, New York. (Original work published 1954).
40. Fella Evelyn. Keeping your cool in a writing lab. C.A.L.L. Digest. 5:(6):1989;3-4.
41. Freedman Aviva, Clarke Linda. The effect of computer technology on composing processes and written products of grade 8 and grade 12 students. 1988;The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED 298 535).
42. Friedlander Alexander, Markel Mike. Some effects of the Macintosh on technical writing assignments. Computers and Composition. 8:(1):1990;69-79.
43. Fryer Bronwyn. The well-wired manager. Working Woman. 21:(6):1996, June;16-18.
44. Gass William. The polemical philosopher. New York Review of Books. 35:(1):1988, February 4;35-41.
45. Gatlin Rebecca, Rogers Betty, Kordsmeier William. Word processing competencies. 1995;University of Central Arkansas, Conway AR. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED382 182).
46. Gerlach Gail J. The effect of typing skill on using a word processor for composition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Washington, DC :1987, April;. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 286 465).
47. Gerrard Lisa. The evolution of the computers and writing conference. Computers and Composition. 12:(3):1995;279-292.
48. Gibbs W. Wayt. Taking computers to task. Scientific American. 1997, July;. Available 〈http://www.sciam.com/0797issue/0797/trends.html〉 [August 8, 1997].
49. Greenleaf Cynthia. Technological indeterminacy: The role of classroom writing practices in shaping computer use. Technical Report No. 57. 1992, January;University of California, Berkeley, CA. & Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, Center for the Study of Writing.
50. Greenleaf Cynthia. Technological indeterminacy: The role of classroom writing practices and pedagogy in shaping student use of the computer. Written Communication. 11:(1):1994;85-130.
51. Griffin Barbara J. Writing-across-the-curriculum techniques in the computer classroom. The Computer-Assisted Composition Journal. 4:(1):1989;1-7.
52. Haas Christina. Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. 1996;Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
53. Haas Christina, George Ann. Constructing technology through discourse. Haas Christina. Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. 1996;166-201 Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
54. Haas Christina, George Ann. Constructing technology through discourse. Haas Christina. Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. 1996;247-271 Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
55. Haas Christina, Neuwirth Christine M. Writing the technology that writes us: Research on literacy and the shape of technology. Selfe Cynthia L., Hilligoss Susan. Literacy and Computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology. 1994;319-335 The Modern Language Association, New York.
56. Hardison O.B. Jr. Disappearing through the skylight: Culture and technology in the twentieth century. 1989;Viking Penguin, New York.
57. Hawisher Gail E. Research and recommendations for computers and composition. Hawisher Gail E., Selfe Cynthia L. Critical perspectives on computers and composition instruction. 1989;44-69 Teachers College Press, New York.
58. Hawisher Gail E., LeBlanc Paul, Moran Charles, Selfe Cynthia L. Computers and the teaching of writing in American higher education. 1979-1994: A history. 1996;Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
59. Hawisher Gail E., Selfe Cynthia L. The rhetoric of technology and the electronic writing class. College Composition and Communication. 42:(1):1991;55-65.
60. Hayes John R. A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. Levy C. Michael, Ransdell Sarah. The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications. 1996;1-27 Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
61. Heilker Paul. Revision worship and the computer as audience. Computers and Composition. 9:(3):1992;59-69.
62. Heim Michael. Electric language: A philosophical study of word processing. 1987;Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
63. Heim Michael. The metaphysics of virtual reality. 1993;Oxford University Press, New York.
64. Herrmann Andrea W. Teaching strategies for introducing word processing into the writing class. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English. Philadelphia, PA :1985a, November;. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 276 037).
65. Herrmann Andrea W. Writing on the computer: Marginal, selective, and dynamic learners. Paper presented at the UCLA Conference on Computers and Writing: New Directions in Teaching and Research. Los Angeles, CA :1985b, May;. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 259 368).
66. Herrmann Andrea W. Evaluating computer-supported writing. Hawisher Gail E., Selfe Cynthia L. Evolving perspectives on computers and composition studies: Questions for the 1990s. 1991;150-170 National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL. and Houghton, MI: Computers and Composition.
67. Hilligoss Susan, Selfe Cynthia L. Studying literacy with computers. Selfe Cynthia L., Hilligoss Susan. Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching, and learning with technology. 1994;336-340 The Modern Language Association, New York.
68. Johnson-Eilola Johndan. Nostalgic angels: rearticulating hypertext writing. 1997;Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
69. Jones William Goodrich. Humanist scholars' use of computers in libraries and writing. Selfe Cynthia L., Hilligoss Susan. Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology. 1994;157-170 The Modern Language Association, New York.
70. Joram Elana, Woodruff Earl, Bryson Mary, Lindsay Peter H. The effects of revising with a word processor on written composition. Research in the Teaching of English. 26:(2):1992;167-193.
71. Joram Elana, Woodruff Earl, Lindsay Peter, Bryson Mary. Students' editing skills and attitudes toward word processing. Computers and Composition. 7:(3):1990;55-72.
72. Jostad Karen. MultiScribe: A word processor/publisher hybrid. The Writing Notebook. 6:(2):1988;32-33.
73. Kalmbach James. From liquid paper to typewriters: Some historical perspectives on technology in the classroom. Computers and Composition. 13:(1):1996;57-68.
74. Kalmbach James R. The computer and the page: Publishing, technology, and the classroom. 1997;Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
75. Kehagia Olga, Cox Margaret. Revision changes when using word processors in an English as a foreign language context. Computer Assisted Language learning. 10:(3):1997;239-253.
76. Kellogg Ronald T. The psychology of writing. 1994;Oxford University Press, New York.
77. Kellogg Ronald T., Mueller Suzanne. Cognitive tools and thinking performance: The case of word processors and writing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society. Atlanta, GA :1989, November;. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 311 455).
78. Kirkpatrick Carolyn. Implementing computer-mediated writing: Some early lessons. Machine-Mediated Learning. 2:(1/2):1987;35-45.
79. Kurth Ruth J. Using word processing to enhance revision strategies during student writing activities. Educational Technology. 27:(1):1987;13-19.
80. Landauer Thomas K. The trouble with computers: Usefulness, usability, and productivity. 1995;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
81. Lanham Richard A. The electronic word: Democracy, technology, and the arts. 1993;University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
82. Levy Michael. Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. 1997;Oxford University Press, New York.
83. Li Nim-Yu Kitty. Writing with pen or computer? A study on ESL secondary school learners. Paper presented at the annual World Conference on Computers in Education, Sydney, New South Wales. Australia :1990, July;. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 322 720).
84. Li Nim-Yu Kitty. Word processing writing for ESL basic writer: Pain or gain? Paper presented at the annual meeting of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. Baltimore, MD :1994, March.
85. Liechty Anna L. The efficacy of computer assisted instruction in teaching composition. 1989;Exit Project, Indiana University at South Bend, South Bend, IN. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 314 023).
86. Lucky Robert W. Silicon dreams: Information, man, and machine. 1989;St. Martin's Press, New York.
87. Magoto Jeff. From the nets: When are computers inappropriate? CAELL Journal. 6:(2):1995;30-33.
88. Mårdsjö Karin. Interfacing technology. Computers and Composition. 13:(3):1996;303-315.
89. Markel Mike. Behaviors, attitudes, and outcomes: A study of word processing and writing quality among experienced word-processing students. Computers and Composition. 11:(1):1994;49-58.
90. McAllister Carole, Louth Richard. The effect of word processing on the quality of basic writers' revisions. Research in the Teaching of English. 22:(4):1988;417-427.
91. Mehan Hugh. Microcomputers in classrooms: Educational technology or social practice? Anthropology and Education Quarterly. 20:1989;4-22.
92. Microsoft WORD for WINDOWS 95 7.0 [Computer software]. 1995;Microsoft Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
93. Miller Larry, Olson John. Putting the computer in its place: A study of teaching with technology. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 26:(2):1994;121-141.
94. Miller-Souviney Barbara, Souviney Randall. A classroom word processing guide (Report No. 18). 1987;Center for Human Information Processing, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 307 628).
95. Montague Marjorie. Computers, cognition, and writing instruction. 1990;State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
96. Mullins Phil. The fluid word: Word processing and its mental habits. Thought. 63:1988;413-428.
97. Murray Denise E. Knowledge machines: Language and information in a technological society. 1995;Longman, New York.
98. Nichols Randall G. Word processing and basic writers. Journal of Basic Writing. 5:(2):1986;81-97.
99. NISUSWRITER [Computer software]. 1995;Paragon Concepts, Solana Beach, CA. Japanese version by Mercury Software, Kyoto, Japan.
100. North Stephen M. The making of knowledge in composition: Portrait of an emerging field. 1987;Boynton/Cook, Portsmouth, NH.
101. Ong Walter J. Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. 1982;Methuen, London.
102. Opack Michele M., Perushek Barbara A. Effective instruction in word processing: Maximizing minimal competence. Educational Technology. 26:(12):1986;33-36.
103. Oppenheimer Todd. The computer delusion. The Atlantic Monthly. 280:(1):1997, July;45-62.
104. Ortega Lourdes. Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion. Language Learning & Technology. 1:(1):1997;82-93. Available 〈http://polyglot.cal.msu.edu/llt/vollnuml/ortega/default.html〉 [July 29, 1997].
105. Owston Ronald D. Computers and the teaching of writing: Implications for teacher development. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education. 2:(2):1993;239-250.
106. Owston Ronald D., Murphy Sharon, Wideman Herbert H. On and off computer writing of eighth grade students experienced in word processing. Computers in the Schools. 8:(4):1991;67-87.
107. Owston Ronald D., Murphy Sharon, Wideman Herbert H. The effects of word processing on students' writing quality and revision strategies. Research in the Teaching of English. 26:(3):1992;249-276.
108. Peacock Michael, Breese Chris. Pupils with portable writing machines. Educational Review. 42:(1):1990;41-56.
109. Pelletier Pierre. Word processing as a support to the writing process. International Journal of Instructional Media. 19:(3):1992;249-257.
110. Pennington Martha. computer and the non-native writer: A natural partnership. 1996;Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ.
111. Pennington Martha C., Brock Mark N. Process and product approaches to computer-assisted composition. Pennington Martha C., Stevens Vance. Computers in applied linguistics: An international perspective. 1992;79-109 Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, England.
112. Peterson Sarah E. A comparison of student revisions when composing with pen and paper versus word processing. Computers in the Schools. 9:(4):1993;55-69.
113. Phinney Marianne. Computers, composition, and second language teaching. Pennington Martha C. Teaching languages with computers: The state of the art. 1989;81-96 Athelstan, La Jolla, CA.
114. Phinney Marianne. Exploring the virtual world: Computers in the second language writing classroom. Pennington Martha C. The power of CALL. 1996;137-152 Athelstan, Houston, TX.
115. Phinney Marianne, Khouri Sandra. Computers, revision, and ESL writers: The role of experience. Journal of Second Language Writing. 2:(3):1993;257-277.
116. Postman Neil. Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. 1992;Vintage, New York.
117. Pufahl John. Response to Richard M. Collier, 'The word processor and revision strategies'. College Composition and Communication. 34:1984;91-93.
118. Reed W. Michael. Assessing the impact of computer-based writing instruction. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 28:(4):1996;418-437.
119. Reeves Byron, Nass Clifford. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. 1996;Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University Publications, Stanford, CA. & New York: Cambridge University Press.
120. Reynolds Thomas J., Lewis Charles R. The changing topography of computer access for composition students. Computers and Composition. 14:(2):1997;269-278.
121. Riel Margaret. The impact of computers in classrooms. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 22:(2):1989;180-190.
122. Riel Margaret. Computer-mediated communication: A tool for reconnecting kids with society. Interactive Learning Environments. 1:(4):1990;255-263.
123. Riel Margaret. Educational change in a technology-rich environment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 26:(4):1994;452-474.
124. Sanders Barry. A is for ox: The collapse of literacy and the rise of violence in an electronic age. 1994;Vintage, New York.
125. Schaeffer E. Marilyn. Teaching writing with the microcomputer. 1987;Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, Bloomington, IN.
126. Scott Suzanne, Stoller Fredricka L. Creating a suitable word-processing manual for ESL students. College ESL. 6:(2):1996;39-49.
127. Selfe Cynthia L., Selfe Richard J. Jr. The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. College Composition and Communication. 45:(4):1994;480-504.
128. Sharples Mike. Computer support for the rhythms of writing. Computers and Composition. 11:(3):1994;217-226.
129. Sheingold Karen. The microcomputer as a symbolic medium. Pea Roy D., Sheingold Karen. Mirrors of minds: Patterns of experience in educational computing. 1987;198-208 Ablex, Norwood, NJ.
130. Shurbutt S. Bailey. Integration of classroom computer use and the peer evaluation process: Increasing the level of composition proficiency through student revision. The Writing Center Journal. 8:(1):1987;35-42.
131. Sloane Sarah. A case study of a reluctant word processor: A look at one student in a word-processing classroom. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication. Atlanta, GA :1987, March;. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 285 200).
132. Snyder Ilana. The impact of computers on students' writing: A comparative study of the effects of pens and word processors on writing context, process and product. Australian Journal of Education. 37:(1):1993a;5-25.
133. Snyder Ilana. Writing with word processors: A research overview. Educational Research. 35:(1):1993b;49-68.
134. Snyder Ilana. Writing with word processors: The computer's influence on the classroom context. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 26:(2):1994;143-162.
135. Stoll Clifford. Silicon snake oil: Second thoughts on the information highway. 1995;Anchor, New York.
136. Strickland James. Computer-tutors and a freshman writer: A protocol study. Paper presented at the annual symposium of the New York College Learning Skills Association. Rochester, NY :1987a, April;. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 283 198).
137. Strickland James. Evaluating computer-tutors: A protocol study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication. Atlanta, GA :1987b, March;. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 280 029).
138. Strickland James. How the student writer adapts to computers: A first-year student protocol. Computers and Composition. 6:(2):1989;7-22.
139. Sudol Ronald A. The accumulative rhetoric of word processing. College English. 53:(8):1991;920-932.
140. Sullivan Patricia. Human-computer interaction perspectives on word-processing issues. Computers and Composition. 6:(3):1989;11-33.
141. Susser Bernard. Process approaches in ESL/EFL writing instruction. Journal of Second language Writing. 3:(1):1994a;31-47.
142. Susser Bernard. Word processing and the writing process: A review of research. The Computer-Assisted Composition Journal. 8:(2):1994b;28-37.
143. Talbott Stephen L. The future does not compute: Transcending the machines in our midst. 1995;O'Reilly, Sebastopol, CA.
144. Teles Lucio. The adoption of word processing by graduate students in education. Education & Computing. 4:(4):1988;287-299.
145. Tenner Edward. Why things bite hack: Technology and the revenge of unintended consequences. 1996;Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
146. Thiesmeyer John. Should we do what we can? Hawisher Gail E., Selfe Cynthia L. Critical perspectives on computers and composition instruction. 1989;75-93 Teachers College Press, New York.
147. Thomas David M. The 'I can write' project. Computers in the Schools. 6:(3/4):1989;133-140.
148. Thomas Gordon. Students, teachers, computers, and architects: Designing an open computer writing laboratory. Myers Linda. Approaches to computer writing classrooms: Learning from practical experience. 1993;181-198 State University of New York Press, Albany, NY.
149. Thomas Irene D. Uses of the computer in teaching the composing process: 1985 annual report of the NCTE Committee on Instructional Technology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English. Philadelphia, PA :1985, November;. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 265 571).
150. Tone Bruce, Winchester Dorothy. Too early to judge the impact: Computer-assisted writing instruction. ERIC Digest, Number 2. 1988;. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 293 130).
151. Tornow Joan. Link/Age: Composing in the online classroom. 1997;Utah State University Press, Logan, UT.
152. Tuman Myron C. Word perfect: Literacy in the computer age. 1992;University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, PA.
153. Tuman Myron. Campus word processing: Seven design principles for a new academic writing environment. Computers and Composition. 10:(3):1993;49-62.
154. Turkle Sherry. Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. 1995;Simon and Schuster, New York.
155. van der Geest Thea. Professional writing studied: Authors' accounts of planning in document production processes. Sharples Mike, van der Geest Thea. The new writing environment: Writers at work in a world of technology. 1996;7-24 Springer-Verlag London, London.
156. Van Haalen Teresa. Efficacy of word processing as a writing tool for bilingual elementary school students: A pilot study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwestern Educational Research Association. 1990;. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 318 233).
157. Van Haalen Teresa, Bright George W. Writing and revising by bilingual students in traditional and word processing environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 9:(3):1993;313-328.
158. Vidal Gore. In love with the adverb. New York Review of Books. 31:(5):1984, March 29;20-21.
159. Wallace Ray. Computer-assisted composition: Guidelines for ESL instruction. The Computer-Assisted Composition Journal. 2:(2):1988;89-95.
160. Wiener Lauren Ruth. Digital woes: Why we should not depend on software. 1993/1994;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
161. Williamson Michael M., Pence Penny. Word processing and student writers. Britton Bruce K., Glynn Shawn M. Computer writing environments: Theory, research, and design. 1989;93-127 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
162. Winner Langdon. The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in an age of high technology. 1986;University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
163. Winograd Terry, Flores Fernando. Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. 1986/1987;Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
164. Wolfe Edward W., Bolton Sandra, Feltovich Brian, Bangert Art W. A study of wordprocessing experience and its effects on student essay writing. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 14:(3):1996;269-283.
165. Wright Anne. Terminal writing in the writing lab? The Writing Center Journal. 8:(1):1987;21-28.
166. Wright Anne. Teaching writing while jumping through new technological hoops. English Journal. 77:(7):1988;33-38.
167. Yates Simeon J. Oral and written linguistic aspects of computer conferencing. Herring Susan C. Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives. 1996;29-46 John Benjamins, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
168. Zeni Jane. WritingLands: Composing with old and new writing tools. 1990;National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL.