Asian, hispanic, and native American job candidates: Prescreened or screened within the selection process

Educational Administration Quarterly

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 530-554

  Young, I Phillip ^a   Fox, Julie A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040076114     PISSN: 0013161X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001316102237671     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 681 et seq. (1967).
2. Arvey, R. D., & Faley, R. H. (1992). Fairness in selecting employees (2nd ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley.
3. Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Test of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Psychology, 3, 77-85.
4. Bogardus, E. S. (1967). Measuring social distances. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (pp. 71-76). New York: John Wiley.
5. Bowman J. S. (1998). The relationship between applicant age ad evaluator age in pre-interview screening of teacher applicants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
6. Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(3), 713-715.
7. Cable, D. M., & Gilovich, T. (1998). Looked over or overlooked? Prescreening decisions and postinterview evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 501-508.
8. Castetter, W. B., & Young, I. P. (2000). The personnel function in educational administration. Columbus, MO: Prentice Hall.
9. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276.
10. Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 253, 42 U.S.C. 2000e (West 1996).
11. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
12. Gorman, C. D., Clover, W. H., & Doherty, M. E. (1978). Can we learn anything about interviewing real people from interviews of paper people? Two studies of the external validity paradigm. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 165-192.
13. Hazelwood School District v. United States, 433 U.S. 299 (1977).
14. Heneman, H. G., Heneman, R. L., & Judge, T. A. (1997). Staffing organizations (2nd ed.). Middleton, WI: Mendota House.
15. Michigan State University. (1997). Elementary and secondary teacher education report based on supply and demand for graduation in 1994-1995. Unpublished manuscript, East Lansing: Author.
16. Miller-Smith, K. R. (2001). Effects of organizational representative, school district performance and site-based reform status on teacher screening decisions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
17. Reis, S. B., Young, I. P., & Jury, J. C. (1999). Female administrators: A crack in the glass ceiling. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13, 71-82.
18. Stallard, J. B. (1990). An investigation of factors in resumes that influence the selection of teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University.
19. Triandis, H. C., & Triandis, L. M. (1967). Some studies of social distance. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Readings in attitude theory and measurement (pp. 199-207). New York: John Wiley.
20. Wanous, J. P., & Reichers, A. E. (1998). Estimating the reliability of a single item measurer. Psychological Reports, 78, 631-634.
21. Winter, P. A. (1997). Educational recruitment and selection: A review of recent studies and recommendations for best practice. In L. Wildman (Ed.), Fifth NCPEA yearbook. Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
22. Young, I. P., & Pounder, D.G. (1985). Salient factors affecting decision making in simulated teacher selection interviews. Journal of Educational Equity and Leadership, 5, 216-233.
23. Young, I. P., & Prince, A. L. (1999). Legal implications for teacher selection as defined by the ADA and the ADEA. Journal of Law and Education, 28, 517-529.
24. Young, I. P., Rinehart, J. S., & Baits, D. M. (1997). Age discrimination: Impact of chronological age and perceived position demands on teacher screening decisions. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30, 103-112.