Psychological androgyny: A concept in search of lesser substance. Towards the understanding of the transformation of a social representation

Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 137-155

  Lorenzi Cioldi, Fabio ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040063637     PISSN: 00218308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1996.tb00526.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. BEM, S. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
2. BEM, S. (1976). Probing the promise of androgyny. In A.G. Kaplan and J.P. Bean (eds), Beyond Sex-role Stereotypes: Readings Toward a Psychology of Androgyny. Toronto: Little, Brown & Co., pp. 48-62.
3. BEM, S. (1977). On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 196-205.
4. BEM, S. (1981). Gender schema theory: a cognitive account of sex-typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354-364.
5. BEM, S. (1982). Gender-schema theory and self-schema theory compared. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1192-1194.
6. BEM, S. (1983). Gender-schema theory and its implications for child development: raising gender-aschematic children in a gender-schematic society. Signs, 8, 598-616.
7. BEM, S. (1985). Androgyny and gender schema theory: a conceptual and empirical integration. In T.B. Sonderegger (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 179-226.
8. BEM, S. (1987). Gender schema theory and the romantic tradition. In P. Shaver and C. Hendrick (eds), Sex and Gender. London: Sage, pp. 251-271.
9. BEM, S. (1987). The Lenses of Gender. New Haven: Yale University Press.
10. BEM, S. & LENNEY, E. (1976). Sex-typing and the avoidance of cross-sex behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 48-54.
11. BERKOWITZ, L. & DEVINE, P.G. (1995). Has social psychology always been cognitive? What is 'Cognitive' anyhow? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 696-703.
12. BINION, V.J. (1990). Psychological androgyny: a Black female perspective. Sex Roles, 22, 487-507.
13. BOLTANSKI, L. (1984). Prime éducation et morale de classe [Education and class values]. Paris: Cahiers du Centre de Sociologie Européenne.
14. BROVERMAN, I.K., VOGEL, S.R., BROVERMAN, D.M., CLARKSON, F.E. & ROSENKRANTZ, P.S. (1972). Sex-role stereotypes: a current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59-78.
15. CAILLOIS, R. (1938). Le mythe et l'homme [The myth and the man]. Paris: Gallimard.
16. CONSTANTINOPLE, A. (1973). Masculinity-femininity: an exception to a famous dictum? Psychological Bulletin, 80, 389-407.
17. DE ROSA, A.-M. (1987). The social representations of mental illness in children and adults. In W. Doise and S. Moscovici (eds), Current Issues in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47-138.
18. DOISE, W. (1990). Les représentations sociales [Social representations]. In R. Ghiglione, C. Bonnett & T.F. Richard (eds), Traité de Psychologie Cognitive; 3: Cognition, Représentation, et Communication. Paris: Dunod, pp. 111-174.
19. DOISE, W. (1993). Logiques Sociales dans le Raisonnement [Social logics in reasoning]. Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.
20. FRABLE, D.S. & BEM, S. (1985). If you are gender-schematic, all members of the opposite sex look alike. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 459-468.
21. HEILBRUN, A.B. (1986). Androgyny as type and androgyny as behavior: implications for gender-schema in males and females. Sex Roles, 14, 123-140.
22. HEILBRUN, C.G. (1964). Toward a Recognition of Androgyny. New York: Norton.
23. HURTIG, M.-C. & PICHEVIN, M.-F. (1990). Salience of the sex category system in person perception: contextual variations. Sex Roles, 22, 369-395.
24. JODELET, D. (ed.) (1989). Les Représentations Sociales [Social representations]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
25. KAPLAN, R. (1979). Clarifying the concept of androgyny: implications for therapy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 3, 223-230.
26. LIONETTI, R. (1988). Le Lait du Père [The father's milk]. Paris: Imago.
27. LORENZI-CIOLDI, F. (1991). Self-stereotyping and self-enhancement in gender groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 403-417.
28. LORENZI-CIOLDI, F. (1993). They all look alike, but so do we . . . sometimes. Perceptions of in-group and out-group homogeneity as a function of sex and context. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 111-124.
29. LORENZI-CIOLDI, F. (1994). Les Androgynes [The androgynes]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
30. LORENZI-CIOLDI, F., EAGLY, A. & STEWART, T. (1995). Homogeneity of gender groups in memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 193-217.
31. MARKUS, H., CRANE, M., BERNSTEIN, S. & SILADI, M. (1982). Self-schemas and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 38-50.
32. MORAWSKI, J.G. (1985). The measurement of masculinity and femininity: engendering categorical realities. Journal of Personality, 53, 196-223.
33. MOSCOVICI, S. (1976). La Psychanalyse, Son Image, Son Public [Psychoanalysis, its image and its public] (2nd edn). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
34. MOSCOVICI, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R.M. Farr and S. Moscovici (eds), Social Representations. Oxford & Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and Maison des Sciences de l'Homme, pp. 3-69.
35. MOSCOVICI, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211-250.
36. MOSCOVICI, S. (1993). Towards a social psychology of science. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 23, 343-373.
37. PARSONS, T. & BALES, R.F. (1955). Family, Socialization and Interaction Processes. New York: Free Press.
38. PYKE, S.W. (1980). Androgyny: a dead end or a promise? In C. Stark-Adamec (ed.), Sex-roles: Origins, Influences, and Implications for Women. Montréal: Eden Press Women's Publications, pp. 20-32.
39. RAVINDER, S. (1987). Androgyny. Is it really the product of educated, middle-class Western societies? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 208-220.
40. ROQUEPLO, M. (1974). Le Partage du Savoir [The sharing of scientific knowledge]. Paris: Seuil.
41. ROSSI, A.S. (1964). Equality between the sexes: an immodest proposal. Daedalus, 93, 607-652.
42. ROTHBART, M. & TAYLOR, M. (1992). Category labels and social reality: do we view social categories as natural kinds? In G. Semin and K. Fiedler (eds), Language, Interaction and Social Cognition. London: Sage, pp. 11-36.
43. SAMPSON, E.E. (1977). Psychology and the American ideal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 767-782.
44. SECOR, C. (1974). Androgyny: an early reappraisal. Women Studies, 2, 161-169.
45. SEDNEY, M.A. (1989). Conceptual and methodological sources of controversies about androgyny. In R.K. Unger (ed.), Representations: Social Constructions of Gender. New York: Baywood, pp. 126-144.
46. SHWEDER, R.A. & SULLIVAN, M.A. (1990). The semiotic subject of cultural psychology. In L.A. Pervin (ed.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. New York: Guilford, pp. 399-416.
47. SPENCE, J.T. (1991). Do the BSRI and PAQ, measure the same or different concepts? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 141-165.
48. TERMAN, L.M. & MILES, C.C. (1936). Sex and Personality: Studies in Masculinity and Femininity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
49. WAGNER, W. (1995). Social representations, group affiliation, and projection: knowing the limits of the validity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 125-139.
50. WARREN, M.A. (1980). The Nature of Woman. An Encyclopedia and Guide to the Literature. Pt Reyes: Edgepress.
51. WARREN, M.A. (1982). Is androgyny the answer to sexual stereotyping? In M. Wetterling-Bragin (ed.), 'Femininity', 'Masculinity', and 'Androgyny'. Totowa: Littlefield, Adams & Co., pp. 170-196.
52. WICKLUND, R.A. (1990). Zero-variable Theories and the Psychology of the Explainer. New York: Springer.