National laboratories as business incubators and region builders

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 21, Issue 1-2, 1996, Pages 93-108

  Markusen, Ann ^a   Oden, Michael ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040047512     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02220312     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alic, John, Lewis Branscomb, Harvey Brooks, Ashton Carter, and Gerald Epstein. Beyond Spinoff: Military and Commercial Technologies in a Changing World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1992.
2. Bozeman, Barry, Maria Papadakis, and Karen Coker. Industrial Perspectives on Commercial Interactions with Federal Laboratories. Atlanta: School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, January 1995.
3. Brett, Alistair, David Gibson, and Raymond Smilor, eds. University Spin-off Companies: Economic Development, Faculty Entrepreneurs and Technology Transfer. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1990.
4. Brice, Richard, Dominique Cartron, Tom Rhyne, Merlin Schulze, and Lyle Welly. Commercialization of Los Alamos National Laboratory Technologies via Small Businesses. Austin, TX: MCC Ventures, Inc., 1994.
5. Broad, William. Star Warriors: A Penetrating Look into the Lives of the Young Scientists Behind our Space Age Weaponry. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1985.
6. Clout, Peter. "Vista Control Systems and Los Alamos National Laboratory." Mimeo, Los Alamos, NM, Vista Control Systems, Inc. (October 18,1994).
7. Cohen, Linda, and Roger Noll. "Privatizing Public Research." Scientific American (September 1994): 72-77.
8. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. The Government Role In Civilian Technology: Building a New Alliance. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992.
9. Durgin, David L "The Answer Is-Money, Money, Money." New Mexico Business Watch II, no. 5 (1994).
10. Federal Laboratory-Industry Interaction Working Group of the Federal Laboratory Consortium. Interagency Study of Federal Laboratory Technology Transfer Organization and Operation. Washington, DC: Department of Energy, DOE/METC95/6019, May 1985.
11. Gry, Patricia, Elyse Golob, and Ann Markusen. "Big Firms, Long Arms: A Portrait of a 'Hub and Spoke' Industrial District in the Seattle Region." Regional Studies, 1996, forthcoming.
12. Gusterson, Hugh. Testing Times: A Nuclear Weapons Laboratory at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.
13. Ham, Rose Marie, David Mowery, and Hank Chesbrough. "Managing and Evaluating Single-Firm CRADAs: An Assessment of Five Recent Cases at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory." Berkeley, CA: Center for Research
14. Management, Consortium on Competitiveness and Cooperation Working Paper No. 95-7, September 1995.
15. Harrison, Bennett. Lean and Mean: The Changing Landscape of Corporate Power in the Age of Flexibility. New York: Basic Books, 1994.
16. Hoffman, John. Kaman Science Corporation: The Story of an Innovative, Enduring Enterprise. Draft manuscript, 1995.
17. Malecki, Edward J. "Government-Funded R&D: Some Regional Economic Implications." Professional Geographer 33 (1981): 72-82.
18. Markusen, Ann, Peter Hall, Scott Campbell, and Sabina Deitrick. The Rise of the Gunbelt. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
19. Markusen, Ann, James Raffel, Michael Oden, and Marien Uanes. Coming in from the Cold: The Future of Los Alamos and Sandia National Laboratories. New Brunswick: Rutgers University, Center for Urban Policy Research Working Paper No. 91, 1995.
20. Markusen, Ann. "Clinton, the Congress and Technology Policy in the 1990s." Paper presented at the AAAS Annual Meetings, Baltimore, February 1996.
21. McCorkle, Sherman. "Funding High-Tech Ventures in New Mexico." New Mexico Business Watch II, no. 7 (1994).
22. Mowery, David, and Arvids Ziedonis. "Formation of 'Spinoff Firms from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: An Exploratory Analysis." Working Paper, Berkeley, CA: Center for Research Management, February 1996.
23. New Mexico Business Watch. "Rrm Helps Companies Commercialize Technology." II, no. 2 (1994).
24. New Mexico Business Watch. "Sandia Expands Technology Transfer Programs." III, no. 2 (1995).
25. Office of Technology Assessment Defense Conversion: Redirecting R&D, OTA-ITE-552. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, May 1993.
26. Porter, R., and T. Malone. Biomedical Research Collaboration and Conflict of Interest. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.
27. Radosevich, Raymond. "Employing the Indigenous Startup Strategy Using Spinoff Technology from Federal Laboratories: A Seven-Year New Mexico Experience." Proceedings of the Technology Transfer Society, 1988: 173-180.
28. Radosevich, Raymond. "A Mixed-Strategy Model And Case Example of Federal Technology Transfer in the USA." International Journal of Technology Management 8, nos. 6/7 (1993): 596-610.
29. Radosevich, Raymond. "A Model for Entrepreneurial Spinoffs from Public Technology Sources." International journal of Technology Management 10, no. XX (1995): 1-16.
30. Reppy, Judith. Technology Transfer: A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating Policy." In Judith Reppy and Joseph Pilat, eds.. Defense Conversion and the Future of the National Nuclear Weapons Laboratories, 59-64. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. Peace Studies Program, Occasional Paper #18, April 1994.
31. Roberts, E. Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyond. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
32. Roessner, J. David, and Alden S. Bean. "Patterns of Industry Interaction with Federal Laboratories." Technology Transfer (1994): 59-77.
33. Roessner, J. David. "What Companies Want From the Federal Labs." Issues in Science and Technology X, no. 1 (1993): 37-42.
34. Rosenthal, Debra. At the Heart of the Bomb: the Dangerous Allure of Weapons Work. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1990.
35. Saxenian, Annalee. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.
36. Shama, Avraham. "Guns to Butter: Technology-Transfer Strategies in the National Laboratories." Technology Transfer (Winter 1992).
37. Spitzer, Daniel Jr., and Raymond Radosevich. "Factors Influencing the Intermediate Success of New, High Technology Businesses." Mimeo, Anderson School of Management, University of New Mexico, 1986.
38. Stowsky, Jay. "Beating Our Plowshares into Double-Edged Swords: Assessing the Impact of Pentagon Policies on the Commercialization of Advanced Technologies." Working Paper No. 17, Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, University of California at Berkeley, 1986.
39. Stowsky, Jay, and Burgess Laird. "Conversion to Competitiveness: Making the Most of the National Labs." The American Prospect, no. 11 (1992): 91-98.
40. Teich, Albert, and W. Henry Lambright. "The Redirection of a Large National Laboratory." Minerva XIV, no. 4 (1976): 44774.
41. Tornatzky, Louis. Paul Waugaman, et al. Benchmarking Best Practices for University-Industry Technology Transfer: Working with Start-Up Companies. Research Triangle Park, NC: Southern Technology Council, October 1995.
42. Tornatzky, Louis, Paul Waugaman, et al. Benchmarking University-Industry Technology Transfer in the South: 199394 Data. North Carolina: Southern Technology Council, April 1995.
43. Tornatzky, Louis, Yolanda Batts, et al. The An and Craft of Technology Business Incubation. North Carolina: Southern Technology Council, October 1996.
44. van Opstal, Oebra, and Irwin M. Pikus. National Benefits From National Labs: Meeting Tomorrow's National Technology Needs. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1993.
45. Yudken, Joel, and Ann Markusen. The Labor Economics of Conversion: Prospects for Military-Dependent Engineers and Scientists." In Patricia MacCorquodale, Martha Gilliland, Jeffrey Kash, and Andrew Jameson (eds.), Engineers and Economic Conversion, 135-191. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993.