The amnesia-prone syndrome: Brain state or cultural role?

Contemporary Hypnosis

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 176-181

  Wagstaff, Graham F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040032776     PISSN: 09605290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ch.173     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Barber TX. A comprehensive three-dimensional theory of hypnosis. In Kirsch T, Capafons A, Cardeña-Buelna E, Amigó S (eds) Clinical Hypnosis and Self-regulation: Cognitive-behavioral Perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1999, pp.21-48.
2. Barber TX, Spanos NP, Chaves JF. Hypnotism, Imagination and Human Potentialities. New York: Pergamon, 1974.
3. Barrett D. Fantasizers and dissociaters. Two types of high hypnotizables, two different imagery styles. In Kunzendorf RG, Spanos NP, Wallace BJ (eds) Hypnosis and Imagination. New York: Baywood, 1996, pp.123-36.
4. Coe WC. Posthypnotic amnesia: theory and research. In Spanos NP, Chaves JF (eds) Hypnosis: The Cognitive Behavioral Perspective. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus, 1989, pp. 110-48.
5. Hilgard JR. Personality and Hypnosis: A Study in Imaginative Involvement. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
6. Kunzendorf RG, Boisvert P. Presence vs absence of a 'hidden observer' during total deafness: the hypnotic illusion of subconsciousness vs imaginal attenuation of brainstem evoked potentials. In Kunzendorf RG, Spanos NP, Wallace BJ (eds) Hypnosis and Imagination. New York: Baywood, 1996, pp.223-34.
7. Martin DJ, Lynn SJ. The hypnotic simulation index: successful discrimination of real versus simulating participants. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1995; 154: 338-53.
8. McConkey KM, Sheehan PW. Hypnosis, Memory, and Behavior in Criminal Investigation. New York: Guilford, 1995.
9. Pekala RJ. Hypnotic types: evidence for a cluster analysis of phenomenal experience. Contemporary Hypnosis 1991; 8: 95-104.
10. Pekala RJ, Kumar VK, Marcano G. Hypnotic types: a partial replication concerning phenomenal experience. Contemporary Hypnosis 1995; 12: 194-200.
11. Perlini AH, Spanos NP, Jones W. Hypnotic negative hallucinations: a review of subjective, behavioral and physiological methods. In Kunzendorf RG, Spanos NP, Wallace BJ (eds) Hypnosis and Imagination. New York: Baywood, 1996, pp.199-222.
12. Sarbin TR, Coe WC. Hypnosis: A Social Psychological Analysis of Influence Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972.
13. Sheehan PW, Perry CW. Methodologies of Hypnosis: A Critical Appraisal of Contemporary Paradigms of Hypnosis. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum, 1976.
14. Spanos NP. A sociocognitive approach to hypnosis. In Lynn SJ, Rhue JW (eds) Theories of Hypnosis: Current Models and Perspectives. New York: Guilford, 1991, pp.324-63.
15. Spanos NP. Compliance and reinterpretation in hypnotic responding. Contemporary Hypnosis 1992; 9: 7-14.
16. Wagstaff GF. Compliance, belief and semantics in hypnosis: a nonstate, sociocognitive perspective. In Lynn SJ, Rhue JW (eds) Theories of Hypnosis: Current Models and Perspectives. New York: Guilford, 1991, pp.362-96.
17. Wagslaff GF. Compliance and imagination in hypnosis. In Kunzendorf RG, Spanos NP, Wallace B (eds) Imagination and Hypnosis. New York: Baywood, 1996, pp. 19-40.