The effect of two procedures on hypnotic susceptibility modification

Contemporary Hypnosis

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 212-218

  Cangas, Adolfo J ^a   Pérez, Marino ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALMERÍA   (Spain)

^b NONE

Author keywords

CSTP; Hypnosis; Hypnotic susceptibility modification; Hypnotizability; Sociocognitive theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 0040005897     PISSN: 09605290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ch.137     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barber TX. Hypnosis: A Scientific Approach. New York: Van Nostrand Company, 1969.
2. Bates BL. The effect of demands for honesty on the efficacy of the Carleton Skills Training Program. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1992; 40(2): 88-102.
3. Bates BL, Brigham TA. Modifying hypnotizability with the Carleton Skills Training Program: A partial replication and analysis of components. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1990; 38(3): 183-195.
4. Bates BL, Miller RJ, Cross HJ, Brigham TA. Modifing hypnotic suggestibility with the Carleton Skills Training Program. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988; 55(1): 120-127.
5. Bertrand LD. The assessment and modification of hypnotic susceptibility. In N.P. Spanos and J.F. Chaves (eds) Hypnosis: The Cognitive-behavioral Perspective. Buffalo: Prometheus Books, 1989; 18-31.
6. Bertrand LD, Stam HJ, Radtke HL. The Carleton Skills Training Package for modifying hypnotic susceptibility - A replication and extension. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1993; 41(1): 6-14.
7. Bullard PD, DeCoster DT. The effects of hypnosis, relaxation and reinforcement on hypnotic behaviours and experiences. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 1972; 15: 93-97.
8. Bowers KS, Davidson TM. A neodissociative critique of Spanos's social-psychological model of hypnosis. In: Lynn SJ, Rhue JW, eds. Theories of Hypnosis: Current Models and Perspectives. New York: Guilford, 1991; 105-143.
9. Council JR, Kirsch I, Hafner LP. Expectancy versus absorption in the prediction of hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986; 50: 1237-1242.
10. Diamond MJ. Modification of hypnotizability. Psychological Bulletin 1974; 81(3): 180-198.
11. Fellows BJ, Ragg L. The Carleton Skill Training Program: A preliminary British trial. Contemporary Hypnosis 1992; 9(3): 169-174.
12. Gearan P, Kirsch I. Response expectancy as a mediator of hypnotizability modification. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1993; 41: 84-91
13. Gorassini DR, Spanos NP. A social-cognitive skills approach to succesful modification of hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986; 50(5): 1004-1012.
14. Hilgard ER. The Experience of Hypnosis. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1965.
15. Hilgard ER. Simulation, compliance and skill training in the enhancement of hypnotizability. British Journal of Experimental and Clinical Hypnosis 1989; 6(1): 9-11.
16. Kidder LH. On becoming hypnotized: How skeptics become convinced: A case of attitude change? The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis 1973; 16: 1-8.
17. Kihlstrom JF. Hypnosis. Annual Review of Psychology 1985; 36: 385-418.
18. Kinney JM, Sachs LB. Increasing hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1974; 83(3): 145-150.
19. Perry C. Is hypnotizability modifiable? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1977; 25(3): 125-146.
20. Robertson L, McInnis K, St Jean R. Modifying hypnotic susceptibility with the Carleton Skill Training Package. Contemporary Hypnosis 1992; 9(2): 97-103.
21. Sachs LB, Anderson WL. Modification of hypnotic susceptibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1967; 15(4): 172-180.
22. Sarbin TR, Coe WC. Hypnosis: A Social Psychological Analysis of Influence Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1972.
23. Spanos NP. Hypnotic behavior: A social psychological interpretation of amnesia, analgesia, and 'trance logic'. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1986; 9: 449-502.
24. Spanos NP, Burnley CE, Cross PA. Response expectancies and interpretations as determinants of hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1993; 65: 1237-1242.
25. Spanos NP, Radtke HL, Hodgins DC, Bertrand LD, Stam HJ, Dubreil DL. The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Stability, reliability, and relationships with expectancy and hypnotic experience. Psychological Reports 1983a; 53: 555-563.
26. Spanos NP, Radtke HL, Hodgins DC, Bertrand LD, Stam HJ, Moretti P. The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Relationship with other measures of hypnotic susceptibility, expectancies, and absorption. Psychological Reports 1983b; 53: 723-734.
27. Spanos NP, Radtke HL, Hodgins DC, Stam HJ, Bertrand LD. The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestions Scale: Normative data and psychometric properties. Psychological Reports 1983c; 53: 523-535.
28. Springer CJ, Sachs LB, Morrow JE. Group methods of increasing hypnotic susceptibility. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis 1977; 25(3): 184-191.
29. Wagstaff GF. Hypnosis, Compliance and Belief. Brighton: Harvester, 1981.
30. West V, Fellows B. How to be a 'good' hypnotic subject! Contemporary Hypnosis 1996; 13(2): 143-149.