Fleet Assessments of a Virtual Reality Training System

Military Psychology

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 161-186

  Hays, Robert T ^a,c   Vincenzi, Dennis A ^b  

^a Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division   (United States)

^b EMBRY RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NAWCTSD   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039992289     PISSN: 08995605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327876MP1203_1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Brill, L. M. (1999, July). Virtual reality. Funworld. 15(7), 54-62.
2. Burdea, G., & Coiffet, P. (1994). Virtual reality technology. New York: Wiley.
3. Committee on Ship Bridge Simulation Training, Marine Board, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, National Research Council. (1995). Simulated voyages: Using simulation technology to train and license mariners. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Cook, N. (1994). VR: Even better than the real thing. Jane's Defense Weekly, 21(8), 24-25.
5. Doctrine for submarine interior communications. (1995). (Rep. No. COMSUBLANT/COMSUBPACINST 2305.1D CH-1 N461/N402A). Norfolk, VA, and Pearl Harbor, HI: Commander Submarine Force United States Atlantic and Pacific Fleet.
6. Fowlkes, J., Dwyer, D. J., Oser, R. L., & Salas, E. (1998). Event-based approach to training. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8, 209-221.
7. Gradecki, J. (1994, May-June). Virtual reality arcade systems. PCVR Magazine, 15, pp. 5-8.
8. Hammell, T. J., Williams, K. E., Grasso, J. A., & Evans, W. (1980). Simulators for mariner training and licensing phase I: The role of simulators in the mariner training and licensing process (Vols. 1-2, Rep. No. CAORF 50-78101-01). Kings Point, NY: National Maritime Research Center.
9. Hays, R. T., Seamon, A. G., & Bradley, S. K. (1997). User-oriented design analysis of the VESUB technology demonstration system (Rep. No. NAWCTSD TR 97-013). Orlando, FL: Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division. (DTIC No. ADA 332 570)
10. Hays, R. T., Vincenzi, D. A., Seamon, A. G., & Bradley, S. K. (1998). Training effectiveness evaluation of the VESUB technology demonstration system (Rep. No. NAWCTSD TR 98-003). Orlando, FL: Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division. (DTIC No. ADA 349 219)
11. Kalansky, R. S. (1993). The science of virtual reality and virtual environments. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12. Knerr, B. W., Goldberg, S. L., Lampton, D. R., Witmer, B. G., Bliss, J. P., Moshell, J. M., & Blau, B. S. (1994). Research in the use of virtual environment technology to train dismounted soldiers. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development. 6(4), 9-20.
13. Lampton, D. R., Knerr, B. W., Goldberg, S. L., Bliss, J. P., Moshell, J. M., & Blau, B. S. (1994). The Virtual Environment Performance Assessment Battery (VEPAB): Development and evaluation. Presence, 3, 145-157.
14. Magee, L. E. (1997). Virtual reality simulator (VRS) for training ship handling skills. In R. J. Seidel & P. R. Chatelier (Eds.), Virtual reality, training's future? Perspectives on virtual reality and related emerging technologies (pp. 19-29). New York: Plenum.
15. Null, C. H., & Jenkins, J. P. (1993). NASA virtual environment research, applications, and technology. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
16. Rheingold, H. (1991). Virtual reality. New York: Simon & Schuster.
17. Tenney, Y. J., Briscoe, H., Pew, R. W., Bradley, S. K., Seamon, A. G., & Hays, R. T. (1996). Virtual environment submarine officer of the deck simulation and training: Preliminary requirements recommendation (Rep. No. NAWCTSD SR 96-002). Orlando, FL: Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division.
18. U.S. Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard. (1990). Navigation rules: International-inland (Commandant Instruction No. M16672.2B). Washington, DC: Commandant, United States Coast Guard.