Peer status in the middle school: A natural treatment for unequal participation

Social Psychology of Education

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 193-216

  Eeoyd, Paulette ^a   Cohen, Eeizabeth G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039984576     PISSN: 13812890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Berger, Joseph, Cohen, Bernard P., & Zelditch, Morris, Jr. (1966). Status characteristics and expectation states. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress: Vol. 1 (pp. 29-73). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
2. Berger, Joseph, Fisek, M. Hamit, Norman, Robert Z., & Zelditch, Morris, Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation-states approach. New York: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Inc.
3. Bianchini, Julie (1995). How do middle school students learn science in small groups? An analysis of scientific knowledge and process construction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
4. Borgatti, Stephen P., Everett, Martin G., & Freeman, Linton C. (1996a). UCINETIV Version 1.64 reference manual. Natick, MA: Analytic Technologies.
5. Borgatti, Stephen P., Everett, Martin G., & Freeman, Linton C. (1996b). UCINET IV Version 1.64 software. Natick, MA: Analytic Technologies.
6. Borgatti, Stephen P., Everett, Martin G., & Freeman, Linton C. (1996c). UCINETIV Version 1.64 user's guide. Natick, MA: Analytic Technologies.
7. Cohen, Elizabeth G. (1982). Expectation states and interracial interaction in school settings. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 209-235.
8. Cohen, Elizabeth G., & Eotan, Rachel A. (1995). Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 99-120.
9. Cohen, Elizabeth G. & Eotan, Rachel A. (1997a). Operation of status in the middle grades: Recent complications. In J. Szmatka, J. Skvoretz, & J. Berger (Eds.), Status, network and structure: Theory development and theory growth (pp. 222-240). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10. Cohen, Elizabeth G. & Eotan, Rachel A. (1997b). Raising expectations for competence: The effectiveness of status interventions. In E. G. Cohen & R. A. Eotan (Eds.), Working for equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory in practice (pp. 77-91). New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Cohen, Elizabeth G., Lotan, Rachel A., & Leechor, Chaub (1989). Can classrooms learn? Sociology of Education, 62, 75-94.
12. De Leeuw, Jan & Kreft, Ita (1986). Random coefficient models for multilevel analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 57-86.
13. DiPrete, Thomas A. & Forristal, Jerry D. (1994). Multilevel models: Methods and substance. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 331-357.
14. Krackhardt, David, Blythe, Jim, & McGrath, Cathleen (with assistance of Mark Herbert) (1995). KrackPlot 3.0, user's manual and software. Pittsburgh, PA.
15. Lloyd, Paulette (1998). Status problems and social structure in middle school classrooms. Unpublished master's thesis, San Jose State University, San Jose, California.
16. STATA Corporation (1996). Statistics graphics, data management. Version 5.0, CollegeStation, TX: STATA Corporation.
17. Webster, Murray, Jr., & Foschi, Martha (1988). Overview of status generalization. In M. Webster, Jr. & M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp. 1-23). Stanford: Stanford University Press.