Visual search for conjunctions of motion and form: The efficiency of attention to static versus moving items depends on practice

Visual Cognition

Volumn 6, Issue 3-4, 1999, Pages 385-408

  Müller, Hermann J ^a,b   Von Mühlenen, Adrian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039971084     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/135062899395037     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Berger, R.C., & McLeod, P. (1996). Display density influences visual search for conjunctions of movement and orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 114-121.
2. Cave, K.R., & Wolfe, J.M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225-271.
3. Chun, N.N., & Wolfe, J.M. (1996). Just say no: How are visual searches terminated when there is no target present. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 34-78.
4. Driver, J., & McLeod, P. (1992). Reversing visual search asymmetries with conjunctions of movement and orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 22-33.
5. Enns, J.T. (1992). The nature of selectivity in early human vision. In B. Burns (Ed.), Percepts, concepts and categories, (pp. 39-74) Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
6. Finley, G. (1985). A high-speed point plotter for vision research: Technical note. Vision Research, 25, 1993-1997.
7. Folk, C.L., Remington, R. W., & Wright, J.H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 317-329.
8. Hildreth, E. (1984). The measurement of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Houghton, G., & Tipper, S.P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory mechanisms in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53-112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
10. Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219-227.
11. Lorenceau, J., Shiffrar, M., Wells, N., & Castet, E. (1993). Different motion sensitive units are involved in recovering the direction of moving lines. Vision Research, 33, 1207-1217.
12. McLeod, P., Driver, J., & Crisp, J. (1988). Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel. Nature, 332, 154-155.
13. McLeod, P., Heywood, C., Driver, J., & Zihl, S. (1989). Selective deficit of visual search in moving displays after extrastriate damage. Nature, 339, 466-467.
14. Müller, H.J., & Found, A. (1996). Visual search for conjunctions of motion and form: Display density and asymmetry reversal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 122-132.
15. Müller, H.J., & Maxwell, J. (1994). Perceptual integration of motion and form Information: Is the movement filter involved in form discrimination? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 397-420.
16. Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459-478.
17. Trick, L.M., & Enns, J.T. (1997). Measuring preattentive processes: When is pop-out not enough? Visual Cognition, 4, 163-198.
18. Von Mühlenen, A., & Müller, H.J. (submitted). Perceptual integration of motion and form information: Evidence of parallel-continuous processing.
19. Wolfe, J.M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238.