Local government-sponsored community development: Exploring Relationships Between Perceptions of Empowerment and Community Impact

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 76-94

  Glaser, Mark A ^a   Denhardt, Kathryn G ^b   Grubbs, Joseph W ^b  

^a WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039952682     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/027507409702700106     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Adler, S., & Blake, G. F. (1990). The effects of a formal citizen participation program on involvement in the planning process: A case study of Portland, Oregon. State and Local Government Review, 22(1), 37-43.
2. Ames, D. L., Brown, N. C., Callahan, M. H., Cummings, S. B., Smock, S. M., & Zeigler, J. M. (1992). Rethinking American urban policy. Journal Of Urban Affairs, 14, 197-216.
3. Bell, W., & Boat, M. D. (1957). Urban neighborhoods and informal social relations. American Journal of Sociology, 62, 391-398.
4. Berry, J. M., Portney, K. E., & Thomson, K. (1993). The rebirth of urban democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
5. Blakely, E. J. (1994). Planning local economic development: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Denhardt, R. B. (1993). The pursuit of significance: Strategies for managerial success in public organizations. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
7. Giles, M. W. (1993). The Atlanta Project: A community-based approach to solving urban problems. National Civic Review, 82, 354-362.
8. Gittell, M., (1980). Limits to citizen participation: The decline of community organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9. Goetz, E. G. (1995). Potential effects of federal policy devolution on local housing expenditures. Publius, 25(3), 99-116.
10. Goldsmith, W. W., & Blakely, E. J. (1992). Separate societies: Poverty and inequality in U.S. cities. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
11. Haeberle, S. H. (1988). Community projects and citizen participation: Neighborhood leaders evaluate their accomplishments. Social Science Quarterly, 69, 1014-1021.
12. Jezierski, L. (1990). Neighborhoods and public-private partnerships in Pittsburgh. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 26, 217-249.
13. Kraus, J. (1984). Neighborhood organizations and resource dependency: The establishment in the neighborhood. Journal of Urban Affairs, 6, 116-128.
14. Monti, D. J. (1993). Legend, science, and citizenship in the rebuilding of urban America. Journal of Urban Affairs, 15, 309-326.
15. Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16. Pecorella, R. F. (1985). Resident participation as agenda setting: A study of neighborhood-based development corporations. Journal of Urban Affairs, 7, 13-27.
17. Peirce, N. R. (1996). A Bigger Bang for Welfare Buck? National Journal, 81, 76-81.
18. Silverman, C. J. (1986). Neighboring and urbanism. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 22, 312-328.
19. Spiegel, H.B.C. (1981). The neighborhood partnership: Who's in it? Why? National Civic Review 70(10), 513-520.
20. Thomas, J. C. (1992). Citizen involvement in public management: Lessons from municipal administration. In R. B. Denhardt & B. R. Hammond (Eds.), Public administration in action: Readings, profiles, and cases (pp. 163-173). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
21. Warren, R. B., & Warren, D. I. (1977). The neighborhood organizer's handbook. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
22. Williams, M. R. (1985). Neighborhood organization: Seeds of a new urban life. Westport, CT: Greenwood.