Metathesis in phonological theory: The case of Leti

Lingua

Volumn 104, Issue 3-4, 1998, Pages 147-186

  Hume, Elizabeth ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039939009     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0024-3841(97)00031-4     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aquilina, J., 1959. The structure of Maltese. Malta: The Royal University of Malta.
2. Besnier, N., 1987. An autosegmental approach to metathesis in Rotuman. Lingua 73, 201-223.
3. Chomsky, N. and M. Halle, 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
4. Clements, G.N., 1990. The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In: J. Kingston, M. Beckman (eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology 1: Between the grammar and physics of speech, 283-333. New York: CUP.
5. Clements, G.N. and K.C. Ford, 1979. Kikuyu tone shift and its synchronic consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 10, 179-210.
6. Clements, G.N. and E. Hume, 1995. The internal organization of speech sounds. In: J. Goldsmith (ed.), Handbook of phonological theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
7. Crouch, M. in preparation. The phonology of Dεg. Ms. GILLBT, Ghana.
8. Cutler, A., J.A. Hawkins and G. Gilligan, 1985. The suffixing preference: A processing explanation. Linguistics 23, 723-758.
9. Goldsmith, J., 1976. An overview of autosegmental phonology. Linguistic Analysis 2, 23-68.
10. Hall, C., 1992. Integrating diachronic and processing principles in explaining the suffixing preference. In: Morphology and mind: A unified approach to explanations in linguistics. New York: Routledge.
11. Haraguchi, S., 1977. The tone pattern of Japanese: An autosegmental theory of tonology. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
12. Hume, E.; 1990. Metathesis in Maltese: Consequences for the strong morphemic plane hypothesis. Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 21, GLSA, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 157-172.
13. Hume, E., 1994a. Front vowels, coronal consonants and their interaction in nonlinear phonology. New York: Garland.
14. Hume, E., 1994b. Metathesis in optimality theory. Paper presented to the Phonetics/Phonology Group, Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University.
15. Hume, E., 1995. Prosodic constraints and C/V metathesis. Proceedings of FLSM 6. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
16. Hume, E., 1996. Front vowel, coronal consonant parallels in Maltese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14(1), 165-203.
17. Hume, E., 1997a. Towards an explanation of consonant/consonant metathesis. Ms. Ohio State University.
18. Hume, E., 1997b. Vowel preservation in Leti. Oceanic Linguistics 36(1), 65-101.
19. Hume, E., J. Muller and A. van Engenhoven, 1997. Nonmoraic geminates in Leti. To appear in Phonology 14(3).
20. Hume, E. and D. Odden, 1996. Reconsidering [consonantal]. Phonology 13(3); 345-376.
21. Itô, J. and A. Mester, 1995. Realignment. To appear in: R. Kager, H. van der Hulst, W. Zonneveld (eds.), Proceedings of the Utrecht Workshop on Prosodic Morphology. The Hague: Mouton.
22. Jespersen, O., 1904. Lehrbuch der Phonetik. Leipzig and Berlin.
23. Jespersen, O., 1950 (5th edition). English phonetics. (Translated by B. Jürgensen.) Copenhagen: Gyldendalske Boghandel.
24. Kang, H.-S., 1996. Phonological variation and change in Seoul Korean: A sociolinguistic study. Ph.D.-dissertation, Ohio State University.
25. Kenstowicz, M., 1994. Syllabification in Chukchee: A constraints-based analysis. FLSM 4.
26. Kiparsky, P., 1995. Phonological basis of sound change. In: J. Goldsmith, (ed.), Handbook of phonological theory, 640-670. Oxford: Blackwell.
27. McCarthy, J., 19988. Feature geometry and dependency: A review. Phonetica 43, 84-108.
28. McCarthy, J., 1989. Linear order in phonological representation. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 71-99.
29. McCarthy, J., 1995. Extensions of faithfulness: Rotuman revisted. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
30. McCarthy, J. and A. Prince, 1993. Prosodic morphology. Ms. University of Massachusetts, Amherst and Rutgers University.
31. McCarthy, J. and A. Prince, 1994. The emergence of the unmarked: Optimality in prosodic morphology. In: M. Gonzàlez (ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 24, 333-379. Amherst. MA: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
32. McCarthy, J. and A. Prince, 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. To appear in: R. Kager, H. van der Hulst, W. Zonneveld (eds.), Proceedings of the Utrecht Workshop on Prosodic Morphology. The Hague: Mouton.
33. Muller, J., 1997. Leti reduplication. Paper presented at the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association, UCLA.
34. Ohala, J., 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In: C.S. Masek, R.A. Hendrik, M.F. Miller (eds.), Papers from the parasession on language and behavior, 178-203. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
35. Okrand, M., 1977. Mutsun grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
36. Onn, F., 1976 [1980]. Aspects of Malay phonology and morphology: A generative approach. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. [Published by Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.]
37. Oomen, A., 1981. Gender and plurality in Rendille. Afroasiatic Linguistics 8(1), 35-75.
38. Padgett, J., 1995. Feature classes. In: J. Beckman, S. Urbanczyk, L. Walsh (eds.), Papers in optimality theory, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 18, 385-420. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, GLSA.
39. Poletto, R., 1993. Metathesis and related processes in Wichita. Ms. Ohio State University.
40. Prince, A. and P. Smolensky, 1993. Optimality theory. Ms. Rutgers University and the University of Colorado at Boulder.
41. Pulleyblank, D., 1986. Tone in lexical phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.
42. Rosenthall, S., 1994. Vowel/glide alternation in a theory of constraint interaction. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
43. Sim, R. J., 1981. Morphophonemics of the verb in Rendille. Afroasiatic Linguistics 8(1), 1-33.
44. Smith, N., 1984. All change on CV-tier: Developments in the history of Atim and Autiri. In: H. Bennis, W.U.S. van Lesses Kloeke (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands. Dordrecht: Foris.
45. Stonham, J., 1990. Current issues in morphological theory. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
46. van der Hulst, H. and A. van Engelenhoven, 1995. Metathesis effects in Leti. In: H. van der Hulst and J. van de Weijer (eds.), Leiden in last. HIL Phonology Papers I; The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
47. van Engelenhoven, A., 1994. A description on the Leti language. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Leiden.
48. van Engelenhoven, A., 1995. Indexing the evidence: Metathesis and subordination in Leti. Ms. University of Leiden.
49. Vennemann, T., 1988. Preference laws for syllable structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
50. Webb, C., 1974. Metathesis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
51. Zaborsky, A., 1986. The morphology of nominal plural in the Cushitic languages. Institute für Afrikanistik und Ägyptologie der Universität Wien, Wien.