Social Workers and Privileged Communication in the Federal Legal System

Social Work

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 387-391

  Alexander Jr , Rudolph ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Jaffe v. Redmond; Legal proceedings; Native Americans; Prisoners; Privileged communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039932364     PISSN: 00378046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sw/42.4.387     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Capoccia, R. M. (1995). Piercing the veil of tears: The admission of rape crisis counselor records in acquaintance rape trials. Southern California Law Review, 68, 1335-1390.
2. Cooperstein, E. T. (1989). Protecting rape victims from civil suits by their attackers. Law & Inequality, 8, 279-308.
3. Court considers if records of therapists are privileged. (1996, April). National Criminal Justice Association Bulletin, pp. 4-7.
4. Delaware Code Annotated, Title 24, §3913 (1987).
5. Giampetruzzi, G. F. (1992). Raped once, but violated twice: Constitutional protection of a rape victim's privacy. St. John's Law Review, 66, 151-177.
6. Gibbons, R. B. (1994). Defendant must establish relevancy before obtaining access to sexual abuse victim's privileged records. Suffolk University Law Review, 28, 243-251.
7. Golden, Y. (1987, September 18). Access to record sought in rape case. Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, p. 1.
8. Illinois Complied Statute, §110 (1994).
9. In re Doe, 964 F.2d 1325 (2nd Cir. 1992).
10. In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 867 F.2d 562 (9th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 906 (1989).
11. In re Zuniga, 714 F.2d 632 (6th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 983 (1983).
12. Indiana Code Annotated, §25-23 (1995).
13. Jaffee v. Redmond, 51 F.3d 1346 (7th Cir. 1995).
14. Jaffee v. Redmond, S. Ct., U.S. LEXIS 3879 (1996).
15. Joo, A. Y. (1995). Broadening the scope of counselor-patient privilege to protect the privacy of the sexual assault survivor. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 32, 255-299.
16. Kansas Statute Annotated, §65-6315 (1995).
17. Landstrom v. Illinois Department of Children & Family Services, 892 F.2d 670 (7th Cir. 1990).
18. McCafferty, B. M. (1990). The existing confidentiality privileges as applied to rape victims. Journal of Law and Health, 5, 101-142.
19. Missouri Revised Statute, §337.636 (1994).
20. Oklahoma Statute, Title 59, §1257 (1996).
21. People v. Stanaway; People v. Caruso, 446 Mich. 643; 521 N.W. 557 (1994).
22. Saltzburg, S. A. (1994). Federal Rules of Evidence manual: A complete guide to the Federal Rules of Evidence (6th ed.). Charlottesville, VA: Michie.
23. San Diego House of Hope v. San Diego Department of Social Services, U.S. App. LEXIS 6351 (9th Cir. 1992).
24. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 551 P. 334 (1976).
25. Texas Rule Civil Evidence, 510 (1997).
26. United States v. Burtrum, 17 F.3d 1299 (10th Cir. 1994).
27. United States v. Corona, 849 F.2d 562 (11th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1084 (1989).
28. United States v. Meagher, 531 F.2d 752 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 853 (1976).
29. U.S. v. D.F., 63 F.3d 671 (7th Cir. 1995).
30. Winston v. Children & Youth Services of Delaware City, 948 F.2d 1380 (3rd Cir. 1991).
31. Wisconsin Statute, §905 (1994).