Budgeting for outcomes in state human agencies

Administration in Social Work

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 71-88

  Martin, Lawrence L ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Budgets; Outcomes; State human service agencies

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039925380     PISSN: 03643107     EISSN: 15444376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J147v24n03_05     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bryson, R. (1989). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Florida Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. (Florida OPPAGA). (1997a). Performance-based program budgeting in context: History and comparison. Tallahassee: Author.
3. Florida Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. (Florida OPPAGA). (1997b). Performance-based program budgeting in Florida: Current status and next steps, report No. 96-77B. Tallahassee, Author.
4. Florida Commission on Government Accountability to the People (Florida CGAP) (1996). The Florida benchmarks report. Tallahassee: Author.
5. General Accounting Office (GAO). (1997a). Managing for results-Using the results act to address mission fragmentation and program overlap. Washington, D. C.: Author.
6. General Accounting Office (GAO). (1997b). The results act: Observations on the Department of Health & Human Services’ April 1997 draft strategic plan. Washington, D. C.: Author.
7. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (1994). Concepts statement no. 2 of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board on concepts related to service efforts and accomplishments reporting. Norwalk, CT: Author.
8. Harris, J. & Nicholas, J. (1996). State of Maine strategic planning/performance budgeting guidelines. Augusta: Maine State Planning Office and the Maine Bureau of the Budget.
9. Kettner, P., Moroney, R. & Martin, L. (1990). Designing & managing programs: An effectiveness-based approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
10. Lynch, T. (1995). Public budgeting in America (Fourth Edition). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
11. Martin, L. (1997). Outcome budgeting: A new entrepreneurial approach to budgeting. Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management (Spring):108-126.
12. Melkers, J. & Willoughby, K. (1998). The state of the states: Performance-based budgeting requirements in 47 out of 50 states. Public Administration Review 58:66-73.
13. Minnesota Planning (1996). Minnesota milestones-1996 progress report. St. Paul: Author.
14. Mullen, E. & Magnabosco, J. (1997). Outcomes measurement in the human services. New York: Columbia University Press.
15. Oregon Progress Board. (1996a). Governing for results: Using benchmarks to define & measure progress toward strategic priorities. Salem: Author.
16. Oregon Progress Board. (1996b). Oregon benchmarks-Data directory. Salem: Author.
17. Oregon Progress Board and the Governor’s Oregon Shines Task Force. (1997). Oregon shines II: Updating Oregon’s strategic plan. Salem: Author, 1997.
18. Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
19. Pryrr, P. (1973). Zero-base budgeting: A practical management tool for evaluating expense. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
20. Rubin, I. (1996). Budgeting for accountability: Municipal budgeting for the 1990s. Public Budgeting & Finance 16 (Summer):112-132.
21. State Legislatures (1994). Performance budgets: Back by popular demand (December): 22-25.
22. State of Maine. (1977). Performance budgeting notes. Augusta: Author.
23. Texas State Auditor’s Office (1997). An audit report on performance measures at 26 state agencies-August 1997. Austin: Author.
24. Texas State Auditor’s Office, Legislative Budget Board and the Governor’s Office of Budget & Planning. (1995). Guide to performance measurement for state agencies, universities, and health related institutions. Austin: Author.
25. U. S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS). (1997). Strategic plan-U. S. Department of Health & Human Services. Washington, D.C.: Author.
26. Wildavsky, A. (1974). The politics of the budgetary process. New York: Little Brown & Company.