The effect of distance learning classroom design on student perceptions

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 5-19

  Jayasinghe, Mala Gopalakrishnan ^a   Morrison, Gary R ^b   Ross, Steven M ^b  

^a the University of Memphis ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039918158     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02299680     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anderson, J.F. (1979) Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. Communication Yearbook 3, pp. 543-559.
2. Anderson, J.F., Norton, R.U., & Nussbaum, J.F. (1981). Three investigations exploring relationships between perceived teacher communication behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 30, 377-392.
3. Argyle, M., & Dean, J. (1965). Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 2, 289-304.
4. Arnheim, R. (1957). Film as art. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5. Bland, K., Morrison, G.R., & Ross, S.M. (1992, November). Student attitudes toward Learning Link: A distance education project. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association.
6. Bloom, D., & Puro, P. (1987). Understanding classroom communication. Theory into Practice, 26, 26-31.
7. Cazden, C. (1985). Classroom discourse. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 432-463). New York: Macmillan.
8. Eisenstein, S. (1965). Film form and film sense. Translated by Leyda. Cleveland, Ohio: World Publishing Company.
9. Green, J. (1983). Exploring classroom discourse: Linguistic perspectives on teaching-learning processes. Educational Psychologist, 18, 180-199.
10. Greenbowe, T.J. & Burke, K.A. (1995). Distance education and curriculum change in introductory chemistry in Iowa. TechTrends, 40, 23-25.
11. Gutenko, G. (1991). Penetrating the glass wall: Creating and retaining the interactive illusion in televised distance education. Paper presented at the Canadian Communications Association Conference, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
12. Hackman, M.Z.., & Walker, K.B. (1990). Instructional communication in the televised classroom: The effects of systems design and teacher immediacy on student learning and satisfaction. Communication Education, 39, 196-206.
13. Hayman, J.L. (1963). Viewer location and learning in instructional television. AV Communication Review, 7, 27-31.
14. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J.D., & Smaldino, S.E. (1996). Instructional median and technologies of learning. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
15. Hicken, S., Sullivan, H., & Klein, J. (1992). Learner control modes and incentive variation in computer-delivered instruction. Educational Technology, Research, & Development, 40, 15-26.
16. Holmberg, B., Schuemer, R., & Obermeier, A. (1982). Guided didactic conversation in distance education. Hagen, West Germany: Fern Universitat, ZIFF.
17. Horton, D., & Wohl, R.R. (1956, August). Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry, 29, 215-229.
18. Kelley, D.H., & Gorham, J. (1988). Effects of immediacy on recall of information. Communication Education, 37, 198-207.
19. Levitt, E.A. (1964). The relationship between abilities to express emotional meanings vocally and facially. In J.R. Davitz (ed.), The communication of emotional meaning (pp. 87-100) New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. Mandell, L.M., & Shaw, D.L. (1973). Judging people in the news unconsciously: Effect of camera angle and bodily activity. Journal of Broadcasting, 17, 353-362.
21. Mayers, A.E. (Summer 1967). The effects of student location and teacher role on learning from TV. AV Communication Review, 15(2), 169-179.
22. McCain, T.A., Chilberg, J., & Wakshlag, J. (1977). The effect of camera angle on source credibility and attraction. Journal of Broadcasting, 21, 35-46.
23. McCain, T.A., & Repensky, G. (1972). The effects of camera shot on interpersonal attraction of comedy performers. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois.
24. McCroskey, J.C., Scott, M.D., & Young, T.J. (1971). The dimensions of source credibility for spouses and peers. Paper presented to the Western Speech Communication Association Convention, Fresno, California.
25. Mehrabian, A. (1969). Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior. Behavioral Research Methods and Instruments, 1, 213-217.
26. Mehrabian, A. (1972). Nonverbal communication. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
27. Mehrabian, A., & Ferris, SR. (1967). Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 248-252.
28. Mehrabian, A., & Wiener, M. (1967). Decoding of inconsistent communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 108-114.
29. Mehrabian, A., & Williams, M. (1969). Nonverbal concomitants of perceived and intended persuasiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 37-58.
30. Morrison, G.R., Bland, K., & Ross, S.M. (1992). Evaluation of the first learning link classes: Spring, 1992. Memphis, TN: Memphis State University, Center for Research in Educational Policy.
31. Morrison, G.R., Ross, S.M., Gopalakrishnan, M., & Case, J. (1995). The effects of feedback and incentives on achievement in computer-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 32-50.
32. Plax, T.G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J.C., & Richmond, V.P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43-55.
33. Price, M.A. (1991, January). Designing video classrooms. Adult Learning, 2(4), 15-19.
34. Richmond, V.P., Gorham, J.S., & McCroskey, J.C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 10, (pp 574-590) Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
35. Simonson, M. & Schlosser, C. (1995). More than figure in distance education in Iowa. TechTrends, 40, 23-25.
36. Tiemens, R.K. (1970). Some relationships of camera angle to communicator credibility. Journal of Broadcasting, 24, 483-490.
37. VideoTelecom Benchmark Series. (1991). BenchMark [Brochure], Austin, TX.