Why coherence is not truth-conducive

Analysis

Volumn 61, Issue 271, 2001, Pages 236-241

  Olsson, Erik J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039911942     PISSN: 00032638     EISSN: 14678284     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8284.00300     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Akiba, K. 2000. Shogenji's probabilistic measure of coherence is incoherent. Analysis 60: 356-59
2. Bonjour, L. 1985. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press
3. Bovens, L. and E. J. Olsson. 2000. Coherentism, reliability and Bayesian networks. Mind 109: 685-719
4. Bovens, L. and E. J. Olsson. Forthcoming. Believing more, risking less extensions on coherence, truth and non-trivial extensions
5. Carnap, R. 1950. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
6. Cross, C. 1999. Coherence and truth-conducive justification. Analysis 59 186-93
7. Hansson, S. and E. J. Olsson. 1999. Providing foundations for coherentism. Erkenntnis 51: 243-65
8. Klein, P. and T. Warfield. 1994. What price coherence? Analysis 54 129-32
9. Shogenji, T. 1999. Is coherence truth-conducive? Analysis 59: 338-45
10. Shogenji, T. 2001. Reply to Akiba on the probabilistic measure of coherence. Analysis 61: 147-50