Guiding principles: A review and analysis of student affairs philosophical statements

Journal of College Student Development

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 359-377

  Evans, Nancy J ^a   Reason, Robert D ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039890265     PISSN: 08975264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. American College Personnel Association. (1974). A student development model for student affairs in tomorrow's higher education. Washington, DC: Author.
2. American College Personnel Association. (1996). The student learning imperative: Implications for student affairs [On-line]. Available: http://www.acpa.nche.edu/ sli/sli.htm
3. American College Personnel Association and National Association of Student Personnel Administrators. (1997). Principles of good practice for student affairs [On-line]. Available: http://www.acpa.nche.edu/pgp/principle.htm
4. American Council on Education. (1983a). The student personnel point of view: A report of a conference on the philosophy and development of student personnel work in colleges and universities. In G. L. Saddlemire & A. L. Rentz (Eds.), Student affairs - A profession's heritage: Significant articles, authors, issues and documents (American College Personnel Association Media Publication No. 25, pp. 74-87). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1937)
5. American Council on Education. (1983b). The student personnel point of view. In G. L. Saddlemire & A. L. Rentz (Eds.), Student affairs - A profession's heritage: Significant articles, authors, issues and documents (American College Personnel Association Media Publication No. 25, pp. 122-140). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1949)
6. Brown, R. D. (1972). Tomorrow's higher education: A return to the academy (Student Personnel Series No. 16). Washington, DC: American Personnel and Guidance Association.
7. Caple, R. B. (1998). To mark the beginning: A social history of college student affairs. Lanham, MD: American College Personnel Association.
8. Committee on the Student in Higher Education. (1968). The student in higher education. New Haven, CT: Hazen Foundation.
9. Council of Student Personnel Associations. (1994). Student development services in postsecondary education. In A. L. Rentz (Ed.), Student affairs: A profession's heritage (American College Personnel Association Media Publication No. 40, 2nd ed., pp. 390-401). Lanham, MD: University Press of America. (Original work published 1975)
10. Crowley, W. H. (1949). Some history and a venture in prophecy. In E. G. Williamson (Ed.), Trends in student personnel work (pp. 12-27). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11. Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., & Guido-DiBrito, F. (1998). Student development in college: Theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Kuh, G., Lyons, J., Miller, T., & Trow, J. (1994). Reasonable expectations. Washington, DC: NASPA.
13. Johnson, C. S., & Cheatham, H. E. (Eds.). (1999). Higher education trends for the next century: A research agenda for student success [On-line]. Available: http://www. acpa.nche.edu/seniorscholars/trends.htm
14. Joint Task Force on Student Learning. (1998). Powerful partnerships: A shared responsibility for learning [On-line]. Available: http://www.aahe.org/teaching/ tsk_frce.htm
15. Lloyd-Jones, E. M., & Smith, M. R. (1954). Student personnel work as deeper teaching. New York: Harper.
16. Miller, T. K., & Prince, J. S. (1977). The future of student affairs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. National Association of Student Personnel Administrators. (1987). A perspective on student affairs. Washington, DC: Author.
18. Nuss, E. M. (1996). The development of student affairs. In S. R. Komives & D. B. Woodard (Eds.), Student affairs: A handbook for the profession (3rd ed., pp. 22-42). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Student Learning Imperative: Implications for Student Affairs. (1996). Journal of College Student Development, 37.
20. Thelin, J. R. (1996). Historical overview of American higher education. In S. R. Komives & D. B. Woodard (Eds.), Student affairs: A handbook for the profession (3rd ed., pp. 3-21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. THE Project. (1975). A student development model for student affairs in tomorrow's higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 16, 334-341.
22. Woodard, D. B., Jr. (1998). Societal influences on higher education and student affairs. In N. J. Evans & C. E. Phelps Tobin (Eds.), The state of the art of professional preparation and practice in student affairs: Another look (pp. 3-20). Washington, DC: American College Personnel Association.
23. Young, R. B. (1996). Guiding values and philosophy. In S. R. Komives & D. B. Woodard (Eds.), Student affairs: A handbook for the profession (3rd ed., pp. 83-105). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.