Adult and child understanding of simple reciprocal sentences

Language

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 1-27

  Philip, William ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039849216     PISSN: 00978507     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lan.2000.0091     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. BORER, HAGIT, and KENNETH WEXLER. 1987. The maturation of syntax. Parameter setting and language acquisition, ed. by Tom Roeper and Edwin Williams, 123-72. Dordrecht: Reidel.
2. CHIEN, YU-CHIN, and KENNETH WEXLER. 1990. Children's knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition 1.225-95.
3. CRAIN, STEPHEN. 1991. Language acquisition in the absence of experience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14.597-612.
4. _, and CECILE MCKEE. 1986. The acquisition of structural restrictions on anaphora. North Eastern Linguistic Society 16.94-110.
5. _; ROSALYN THORNTON; CAROL BOSTER; LAURA CONWAY; DIANE LILLO-MARTIN; and E. WOODAMS. 1996. Quantification without qualification. Language Acquisition 5.83-153.
6. DALRYMPLE, MARY; MAKOTO KANAZAWA; SAM MCHOMBO; and STANLEY PETERS. 1995. What do reciprocals mean? Proceedings of the Fourth Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference: SALT IV, ed. by Mandy Harvey and Lynn Santelmann, 1-18. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Working Papers in Linguistics.
7. DOUGHERTY, RAY C. 1974. The syntax and semantics of each other constructions. Foundations of Language 12.1-47.
8. ELMAN, JEFFREY L.; ELIZABETH A. BATES; MARK H. JOHNSON; ANNETTE KARMILOFF-SMITH; DOMENICO PARISI; and KIM PLUNKETT. 1996. Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. FIENGO, ROBERT, and HOWARD LASNIK. 1973. The logical structure of reciprocal sentences in English. Foundations of Language 9.447-68.
10. HEIM, IRENE; HOWARD LASNIK; and ROBERT MAY. 1991. Reciprocity and plurality. Linguistic Inquiry 22.63-101.
11. JESPERSEN, OTTO. 1933. Essentials of English Grammar. London.
12. KAŃSKI, ZBIGNIEW. 1987. Logical symmetry and natural language reciprocals. Proceedings of the 1987 Debrecen Symposium on Language and Logic. 49-68. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
13. KARMILOFF-SMITH, ANNETTE. 1994. Innate constraints and developmental change. Language acquisition: Core readings, ed. by Paul Bloom, 563-90. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. LANGENDOEN, D. TERENCE. 1978. The logic of reciprocity. Linguistic Inquiry 9.177-97.
15. LINK, GODEHARD. 1998. Algebraic semantics in language and philosophy. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
16. PINKER, STEVEN. 1989. The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. ROBERTS, CRAIG. 1987. Modal subordination, anaphora, and distributivity. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
18. ROOTH, MATS E. 1985. Association with focus. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
19. SCHWARZSCHILD, ROGER. 1992. Types of plural individuals. Linguistics and Philosophy 15. 641-75.
20. SPERBER, DAN, and DEIRDRE WILSON. 1986. Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
21. _; FRANCESCO CARA; and VITTORIO GIROTTO. 1995. Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition 57.31-95.
22. ZWICKY, ARNOLD M., and JERROLD M. SADOCK. 1975. Ambiguity tests and how to fail them. Syntax and semantics 4, ed. by J. P. Kimball, 1-35. New York: Academic Press.