A cross-linguistic perspective on imagery and affect in reading: Dual coding in Chinese and English

Journal of Literacy Research

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 293-319

  Steffensen, Margaret S ^a   Goetz, Ernest T ^b   Cheng, Xiaoguang ^c  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c LIAONING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0039792442     PISSN: 1086296X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10862969909548050     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Al-Jubouri, A.J.R. (1984). The role of repetition in Arabic argumentative discourse. In J. Swales & H. Mustafa (Eds.), English for specific purposes in the Arab world (pp. 99-117). Birmingham, UK: Language Studies Unit, University of Aston.
2. Anderson, R.C. (1977). The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise: General discussion of the conference. In R.C. Anderson, R.J. Spiro, & W.E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 415-431). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Anderson, R.C., & Pearson, P.D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P.D. Pearson, R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-292). New York: Longman.
4. Anderson, R.C., Reynolds, R.E., Schallert, D.L., & Goetz, E.T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 367-381.
5. Bartlett, F.C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Cmejrková, S. (1994). Non-native (academic) writing. In S. Cmejrková, F. Daneš, & E. Havlová (Eds.), Writing vs. speaking: Language, text, discourse, communication (pp. 303-310). Tubingen, Germany: Gunter Narr Verlag.
7. Daneman, M., & Tardif, T. (1987). Working memory and reading skill re-examined. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance: XII, The psychology of reading (pp. 491-508). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. De Beaugrande, R., & Dressler, W. (1981). An introduction to text linguistics. New York: Longman.
9. Eggington, W.G. (1987). Written academic discourse in Korean: Implications for effective communication. In U. Connor & R.B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of 12 texts (pp. 153-168). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
10. Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251.
11. Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1984). Protocol analysis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
12. Goetz, E.T., & Sadoski, M. (1996). Imaginative processes in literary comprehension: Bringing the text to life. In R.J. Kreuz & M.S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to the study of literature and aesthetics (pp. 221-240). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Goetz, E.T., Sadoski, M., Stowe, M.L., Fetsco, T.G., & Kemp, S.G. (1993). Imagery and emotional response in reading literary text. Poetics, 22, 35-49.
14. Goetz, E.T., Schallert, D.L., Reynolds, R.E., & Radin, D.I. (1983). Reading in perspective: What real cops and pretend burglars look for in a story. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 500-510.
15. Guan, S. (1995). Cross-cultural communications. Beijing, China: Beijing University Press.
16. Haynes, M., & Carr, T.H. (1990). Writing system background and second language reading: A component skills analysis of English reading by native speaker-readers of Chinese. In T.H. Carr & B.A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development (pp. 375-421). New York: Academic Press.
17. Hinds, J. (1983). Contrastive rhetoric: Japanese and English. Text, 3, 183-195.
18. Hinds, J. (1987). Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In U. Connor & R.B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of 12 texts (pp. 141-152). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19. Hinds, J. (1990). Inductive, deductive, quasi-inductive: Expository writing in Japanese, Korean, Chinese, and Thai. In U. Connor & A.M. Johns (Eds.), Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 87-109). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
20. Holes, C. (1984). Textual approximation in the teaching of academic writing to Arab students: A contrastive approach. In J. Swales & H. Mustafa (Eds.), English for specific purposes in the Arab world (pp. 228-242). Birmingham, UK: Language Studies Unit, University of Aston.
21. Hu, S. (1992). Comparative studies in English and Chinese rhetoric. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Foreign Languages Education Press.
22. Infusino, D. (1992, March). Anthony Hopkins. Vis á Vis, 1, 38-40.
23. Kaplan, R. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1-20.
24. Kintsch, W., & Greene, E. (1978). The role of culture-specific schemata in the comprehension and recall of stories. Discourse Processes, 1, 1-13.
25. Koda, K. (1989). The effects of transferred vocabulary knowledge on the development of L2 reading proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 529-540.
26. Koda, K. (1990). The use of NL reading strategies in L2 reading: Effects of NL orthographic structures on L2 phonological receding strategies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 393-410.
27. Koda, K. (1992). The effects of lower-level processing skills on FL reading performance: Implications for instruction. Modern Language Journal, 76, 502-512.
28. Koda, K. (1994). Second language reading research: Problems and possibilities. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15, 1-28.
29. Matalene, C. (1985). Contrastive rhetoric: An American writing teacher in China. College English, 47, 789-808.
30. Mathewson, G.C. (1985).Toward a comprehensive model of affect in the reading process. In H. Singer & R.B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 841-856). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
31. Mathewson, G.C. (1994). Model of attitude influence upon reading and learning to read. In R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 1131-1161). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
32. Mohan, B.A, & Lo, W.A.-Y. (1985). Academic writing and Chinese students: Transfer and developmental factors. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 515-534.
33. Neubert, A., & Shreve, G.M. (1992). Translation as text. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
34. Nisbett, R.E., & Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
35. Paivio, A. (1979). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston. (Original work published in 1971)
36. Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
37. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255-287.
38. Paivio, A., & Desrochers, A. (1980). A dual-coding approach to bilingual memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 390-401.
39. Ponce, F. (1994). Mental imagery in second language reading. Unpublished master's thesis, Illinois State University,Normal, IL.
40. Reynolds, R.E., Taylor, M. A., Steffensen, M.S., Shirey, L.S., & Anderson, R.C. (1982). Cultural schemata and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 353-366.
41. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 192-223.
42. Rumelhart, D.E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce, & W.E. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. Rumelhart, D.E., & Ortony, R.E. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R.C. Anderson, R.J. Spiro, & W.E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 99-135). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Sadoski, M., & Goetz, E.T. (1985). Relationships between affect, imagery, and importance ratings for segments of a story. In J.A. Niles & R. Lalik (Eds.), Issues in literacy: A research perspective. Thirty-fourth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 180-185). Washington, DC: National Reading Conference.
45. Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (1994). A dual coding view of imagery and verbal processes in reading comprehension. In R.B. Rudell, M.R. Rudell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 582-601). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
46. Sadoski, M., Paivio, A., & Goetz, E.T. (1991). A critique of schema theory and a dual coding alternative. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 463-484.
47. Samuels, S.J. (1994). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading, revisited. In H. Singer & R.B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 816-837). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
48. Schallert, D.L. (1982). The significance of knowledge: A synthesis of research related to schema theory. In W. Otto & S. White (Eds.), Reading expository material (pp. 13-48). New York: Academic Press.
49. Soter, A. (1988). The second language learner and cultural transfer in narration. In A.C. Purves (Ed.), Writing across languages and cultures: Issues in contrastive rhetoric (pp. 177-205). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50. Steffensen, M.S., Joag-Dev, C., & Anderson, R.C. (1979). A cross-cultural perspective of reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 10-29.
51. Taylor, G., & Chen, T. (1991). Linguistic, cultural, and subcultural issues in contrastive discourse analysis: Anglo-American and Chinese scientific texts. Applied Linguistics, 12, 319-336.
52. Tzeng, O.J.L., & Wang, W.S.-Y. (1985). The first two r's. In H. Singer & R.B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, artificial intelligence, linguistics, and education (pp. 453-481). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Venuti, L. (1986). The translator's invisibility. Criticism, 28, 179-212.